| Exam Board | OCR MEI |
|---|---|
| Module | Further Numerical Methods (Further Numerical Methods) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Session | November |
| Marks | 10 |
| Paper | Download PDF ↗ |
| Mark scheme | Download PDF ↗ |
| Topic | Numerical integration |
| Type | Simpson's rule application |
| Difficulty | Challenging +1.2 This is a structured numerical methods question requiring trapezium rule calculation, understanding of Simpson's rule relationships, and Richardson extrapolation. While it involves multiple parts and the final extrapolation technique, each step is methodical and follows standard Further Maths numerical methods procedures without requiring novel insight. The spreadsheet context and systematic progression make it more accessible than typical proof-based Further Maths questions. |
| Spec | 1.09f Trapezium rule: numerical integration |
| A | B | C | ||
| 1 | \(n\) | \(T _ { n }\) | \(S _ { 2 n }\) | |
| 2 | 1 | 2.130135 | ||
| 3 | 2 | 2.149378 | ||
| 4 | 4 | 2.134751 | 2.129862 | |
| 5 | 8 | 2.131084 |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | (a) | oe soi |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| 2 | M1 |
| A1 | 1.1 |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | (b) | = (4*B5 โ B4)/3 |
| A1 | 1.1a | |
| 1.1 | use of |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | (c) | soi |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| 3 | M1 |
| A1 | 1.1 |
| 1.1 | or use of composite rule with h = |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | (d) | comparison of S and S |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| 2.1299 is secure or 2.12986 is probable | E1 |
| B1 | 3.1a |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | (e) | oe |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| 2.12986 is certain or 2.129861 is possible | M1 |
| A1 | 3.1a |
| 2.2b | allow M1 for |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| 4 | 1.49682562605 |
Question 4:
4 | (a) | oe soi
1
2.๏ฟฝ2โ0271+037๏ฟฝ cao
2 | M1
A1 | 1.1
1.1
[2]
4 | (b) | = (4*B5 โ B4)/3 | M1
A1 | 1.1a
1.1 | use of
4๐๐2๐๐ โ ๐๐๐๐
all correct
3
[2]
4 | (c) | soi
4ร2.134751 โ2.149378
2.129875 cao
3 | M1
A1 | 1.1
1.1 | or use of composite rule with h =
0.25
[2]
4 | (d) | comparison of S and S
4 8
2.1299 is secure or 2.12986 is probable | E1
B1 | 3.1a
2.2b
[2]
4 | (e) | oe
16 ร2.129862 โ๐ก๐กโ๐๐๐๐๐๐ 2.129875
15
2.12986 is certain or 2.129861 is possible | M1
A1 | 3.1a
2.2b | allow M1 for
2.129862 โ๐ก๐กโ๐๐๐๐๐๐ 2.129875
e g 2.129862+ 16
[2]
4 | 1.49682562605
4
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item Use the trapezium rule with 1 strip to calculate an estimate of $\int _ { 1 } ^ { 2 } \sqrt { 1 + x ^ { 3 } } \mathrm {~d} x$, giving your\\
answer correct to six decimal places.\\[0pt]
[2]\\
Fig. 4 shows some spreadsheet output containing further approximations to this integral using the trapezium rule, denoted by $T _ { n }$, and Simpson's rule, denoted by $S _ { 2 n }$.
\begin{table}[h]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{ | c | c | c | c | c | }
\hline
& A & B & C & \\
\hline
1 & $n$ & $T _ { n }$ & $S _ { 2 n }$ & \\
\hline
2 & 1 & & 2.130135 & \\
\hline
3 & 2 & 2.149378 & & \\
\hline
4 & 4 & 2.134751 & 2.129862 & \\
\hline
5 & 8 & 2.131084 & & \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\captionsetup{labelformat=empty}
\caption{Fig. 4}
\end{center}
\end{table}
\item Write down an efficient formula for cell C 4.
\item Find the value of $S _ { 4 }$, giving your answer correct to 6 decimal places.
\item Without doing any further calculation, state the value of $\int _ { 1 } ^ { 2 } \sqrt { 1 + x ^ { 3 } } \mathrm {~d} x$ as accurately as\\
possible, justifying the precision quoted.\\[0pt]
[2]
\item Use the fact that Simpson's rule is a fourth order method to obtain an improved approximation to the value of $\int _ { 1 } ^ { 2 } \sqrt { 1 + x ^ { 3 } } \mathrm {~d} x$, stating the value of this integral to a precision which seems justified.
\end{enumerate}
\hfill \mbox{\textit{OCR MEI Further Numerical Methods 2020 Q4 [10]}}