| Exam Board | OCR MEI |
|---|---|
| Module | Further Numerical Methods (Further Numerical Methods) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Session | June |
| Marks | 6 |
| Paper | Download PDF ↗ |
| Mark scheme | Download PDF ↗ |
| Topic | Numerical integration |
| Type | Trapezium rule applied to real-world data |
| Difficulty | Standard +0.3 This is a straightforward application of standard numerical methods formulas. Part (a) uses basic linear approximation (error ≈ h × f'(x)), and part (b) requires recognizing quadratic convergence from ratio patterns in Newton-Raphson output—both are textbook exercises requiring recall and direct application rather than problem-solving or insight. |
| Spec | 1.09d Newton-Raphson method |
| \(x\) | \(\mathrm { f } ( x )\) | \(\frac { \mathrm { dy } } { \mathrm { dx } }\) |
| 2 | 6 | - 2.8 |
| A | B | C | D | |
| 1 | r | Xr | difference | ratio |
| 2 | 0 | 12 | ||
| 3 | 1 | -13.1165572 | -25.1165572 | |
| 4 | 2 | 1.76283279 | 14.87939004 | -0.5924136 |
| 5 | 3 | 2.18052157 | 0.41768878 | 0.02807163 |
| 6 | 4 | 2.182419024 | 0.001897454 | 0.00454275 |
| 7 | 5 | 2.182419066 | \(4.13985 \mathrm { E } - 08\) | \(2.1818 \mathrm { E } - 05\) |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | (a) | use of soi |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| (error ≈) ‒0.084 cao | M1 |
| A1 | 1.2 |
| 1.1 | may see eg |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | (b) | (i) |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| higher than first order | B1 |
| B1 | 2.2a |
| 2.2b | ignore superfluous comments |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | (b) | (ii) |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| generally second order | B1 |
| B1 | 2.2b |
| 2.4 | allow 2.18241907 or 2.1824191 |
Question 7:
7 | (a) | use of soi
f(2+0.03) ≈ f(2)+0.03f′(2)
(error ≈) ‒0.084 cao | M1
A1 | 1.2
1.1 | may see eg
may be implied by 5.916
±2.8×0.03
mark the final answer
allow SC1 for correct final answer unsupported
[2]
7 | (b) | (i) | ratio of differences is decreasing
(which suggests) convergence is faster than
first order;
allow (which suggests) convergence is
higher than first order | B1
B1 | 2.2a
2.2b | ignore superfluous comments
do not allow if spoiled by incorrect reasoning;
do not allow (which suggests) second order convergence
do not allow greater than first order convergence
if B0B0 allow SC1 for ratio of differences not converging to a
constant so convergence not first order
[2]
7 | (b) | (ii) | 2.182419066
since convergence is faster than first order /
generally second order | B1
B1 | 2.2b
2.4 | allow 2.18241907 or 2.1824191
or allow B1 for 2.182419 and B1 for eg since agree
to this precision oe; allow last two estimates or values in B6
𝑥𝑥4 and 𝑥𝑥5
and B7
[2]
7 The value of a function, $\mathrm { y } = \mathrm { f } ( \mathrm { x } )$, and its gradient function, $\frac { \mathrm { dy } } { \mathrm { dx } }$, when $x = 2$, is given in Table 7.1.
\begin{table}[h]
\begin{center}
\captionsetup{labelformat=empty}
\caption{Table 7.1}
\begin{tabular}{ | c | c | c | }
\hline
$x$ & $\mathrm { f } ( x )$ & $\frac { \mathrm { dy } } { \mathrm { dx } }$ \\
\hline
2 & 6 & - 2.8 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\end{table}
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item Determine the approximate value of the error when $f ( 2 )$ is used to estimate $f ( 2.03 )$.
The Newton-Raphson method is used to find a sequence of approximations to a root, $\alpha$, of the equation $\mathrm { f } ( x ) = 0$. The spreadsheet output showing the iterates, together with some further analysis, is shown in Table 7.2.
\begin{table}[h]
\begin{center}
\captionsetup{labelformat=empty}
\caption{Table 7.2}
\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|}
\hline
& A & B & C & D \\
\hline
1 & r & Xr & difference & ratio \\
\hline
2 & 0 & 12 & & \\
\hline
3 & 1 & -13.1165572 & -25.1165572 & \\
\hline
4 & 2 & 1.76283279 & 14.87939004 & -0.5924136 \\
\hline
5 & 3 & 2.18052157 & 0.41768878 & 0.02807163 \\
\hline
6 & 4 & 2.182419024 & 0.001897454 & 0.00454275 \\
\hline
7 & 5 & 2.182419066 & $4.13985 \mathrm { E } - 08$ & $2.1818 \mathrm { E } - 05$ \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\end{table}
\item \begin{enumerate}[label=(\roman*)]
\item Explain what the values in column D tell you about the order of convergence of this sequence of approximations.
\item Without doing any further calculation, state the value of $\alpha$ as accurately as you can, justifying the precision quoted.
\end{enumerate}\end{enumerate}
\hfill \mbox{\textit{OCR MEI Further Numerical Methods 2023 Q7 [6]}}