OCR MEI Further Numerical Methods 2022 June — Question 6 11 marks

Exam BoardOCR MEI
ModuleFurther Numerical Methods (Further Numerical Methods)
Year2022
SessionJune
Marks11
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicFixed Point Iteration
TypeApply iteration to find root (pure fixed point)
DifficultyStandard +0.8 This is a Further Maths numerical methods question requiring understanding of fixed point iteration convergence, error analysis from oscillating sequences, and relaxed iteration. Part (a) demands careful analysis of the oscillating convergence pattern to determine precision, while part (b) involves applying the relaxation formula. The topic is specialized (Further Maths) and requires more sophisticated numerical analysis than standard A-level, but the calculations themselves are straightforward once the concepts are understood.
Spec1.09c Simple iterative methods: x_{n+1} = g(x_n), cobweb and staircase diagrams

6 Charlie uses fixed point iteration to find a sequence of approximations to the root of the equation \(\sin ^ { - 1 } ( x ) - x ^ { 2 } + 1 = 0\). Charlie uses the iterative formula \(\mathrm { x } _ { \mathrm { n } + 1 } = \mathrm { g } \left( \mathrm { x } _ { \mathrm { n } } \right)\), where \(\mathrm { g } \left( \mathrm { x } _ { \mathrm { n } } \right) = \sin \left( \mathrm { x } _ { \mathrm { n } } ^ { 2 } - 1 \right)\).
Two sections of the associated spreadsheet output, showing \(x _ { 0 }\) to \(x _ { 6 }\) and \(x _ { 102 }\) to \(x _ { 108 }\), are shown in Fig. 6.1.
\(r\)\(\mathrm { x } _ { \mathrm { r } }\)differenceratio
00
1-0.841471-0.84147
2-0.2877980.553673-0.65798
3-0.793885-0.50609-0.91405
4-0.3613790.432507-0.85461
5-0.763945-0.40257-0.93078
6-0.4044590.359486-0.89299
\begin{table}[h]
102-0.5963020.004626-0.95886
103-0.600738-0.00444-0.95911
104-0.5964840.004254-0.95887
105-0.600564-0.00408-0.95910
106-0.5966520.003912-0.95888
107-0.600404-0.00375-0.95909
108-0.5968060.003598-0.95889
\captionsetup{labelformat=empty} \caption{Fig. 6.1}
\end{table}
  1. Use the information in Fig. 6.1 to find the value of the root as accurately as you can, justifying the precision quoted. The relaxed iteration \(\mathrm { x } _ { \mathrm { n } + 1 } = ( 1 - \lambda ) \mathrm { x } _ { \mathrm { n } } + \lambda \mathrm { g } \left( \mathrm { x } _ { \mathrm { n } } \right)\), with \(\lambda = 0.51\) and \(x _ { 0 } = 0\), is to be used to find the root of the equation \(\sin ^ { - 1 } ( x ) - x ^ { 2 } + 1 = 0\).
  2. Complete the copy of Fig. 6.2 in the Printed Answer Booklet, giving the values of \(\mathrm { x } _ { \mathrm { r } }\) correct to 7 decimal places and the values in the difference column and ratio column correct to 3 significant figures. \begin{table}[h]
    \(r\)\(\mathrm { x } _ { \mathrm { r } }\)differenceratio
    00
    1
    2
    3
    4-0.000192
    5\(- 1.99 \times 10 ^ { - 7 }\)0.00103
    6\(- 1.82 \times 10 ^ { - 10 }\)0.000914
    \captionsetup{labelformat=empty} \caption{Fig. 6.2}
    \end{table}
  3. Write down the value of the root correct to 7 decimal places.
  4. Explain why extrapolation could not be used in this case to find an improved approximation using this sequence of iterates. In this case the method of relaxation has been used to speed up the convergence of an iterative scheme.
  5. Name another application of the method of relaxation.

Question 6:
AnswerMarks Guidance
6(a) π‘Ÿ
π‘₯ +𝑑 Γ— or π‘₯ +𝑑 Γ—π‘Ÿ
1βˆ’π‘Ÿ
π‘₯ = βˆ’0.596806,𝑑 = 0.003598,
π‘Ÿ = βˆ’0.95889 π‘œπ‘Ÿβˆ’0.9589 π‘œπ‘Ÿβˆ’
0.959 π‘œπ‘Ÿβˆ’0.96
awrt βˆ’0.598567 to awrtβˆ’0.598568
βˆ’0.5986 or βˆ’0.599 is possible due to
AnswerMarks
increased accuracy from extrapolation oeM1
A1
A1
A1
AnswerMarks
[4]3.1a
2.1
1.1
AnswerMarks
2.2bat least two values from information in table; allow sign errors
allowβˆ’0.60 is certain by comparison with π‘₯ oe
108
the final mark is only available if all other marks earned
if M0 allow SC1 for βˆ’0.60 is certain by comparison of
π‘₯ and π‘₯ and confirmation by correct change of sign test
108 107
AnswerMarks Guidance
6(b) r
rdifference ratio
A1
A1
A1
AnswerMarks
[4]1.1
1.1
1.1
AnswerMarks
1.1two iterates seen to 3 or more dp
iterates
differences
ratios
allow M1A1A1A0 for correct values to greater precision
AnswerMarks Guidance
00
1β€’0.4291502 β€’0.429
2β€’0.5817139 β€’0.153
3β€’0.5983772 β€’0.0167
4β€’0.5985695 β€’0.000192
5β€’0.5985697 β€’1.99Γ—10-7
6β€’0.5985697 β€’1.82Γ—10β€’10
6(c) β€’0.5985697 cao
[1]2.2a
6(d) ratio of differences is not constant
[1]2.4
6(e) to adapt an iterative scheme which does not
converge into one which will converge oeB1
[1]1.2
Question 6:
6 | (a) | π‘Ÿ
π‘₯ +𝑑 Γ— or π‘₯ +𝑑 Γ—π‘Ÿ
1βˆ’π‘Ÿ
π‘₯ = βˆ’0.596806,𝑑 = 0.003598,
π‘Ÿ = βˆ’0.95889 π‘œπ‘Ÿβˆ’0.9589 π‘œπ‘Ÿβˆ’
0.959 π‘œπ‘Ÿβˆ’0.96
awrt βˆ’0.598567 to awrtβˆ’0.598568
βˆ’0.5986 or βˆ’0.599 is possible due to
increased accuracy from extrapolation oe | M1
A1
A1
A1
[4] | 3.1a
2.1
1.1
2.2b | at least two values from information in table; allow sign errors
allowβˆ’0.60 is certain by comparison with π‘₯ oe
108
the final mark is only available if all other marks earned
if M0 allow SC1 for βˆ’0.60 is certain by comparison of
π‘₯ and π‘₯ and confirmation by correct change of sign test
108 107
6 | (b) | r | x
r | difference | ratio | M1
A1
A1
A1
[4] | 1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1 | two iterates seen to 3 or more dp
iterates
differences
ratios
allow M1A1A1A0 for correct values to greater precision
0 | 0
1 | β€’0.4291502 | β€’0.429
2 | β€’0.5817139 | β€’0.153 | 0.356
3 | β€’0.5983772 | β€’0.0167 | 0.109
4 | β€’0.5985695 | β€’0.000192 | 0.0115
5 | β€’0.5985697 | β€’1.99Γ—10-7 | 0.00103
6 | β€’0.5985697 | β€’1.82Γ—10β€’10 | 0.000914
6 | (c) | β€’0.5985697 cao | B1
[1] | 2.2a
6 | (d) | ratio of differences is not constant | B1
[1] | 2.4
6 | (e) | to adapt an iterative scheme which does not
converge into one which will converge oe | B1
[1] | 1.2
6 Charlie uses fixed point iteration to find a sequence of approximations to the root of the equation $\sin ^ { - 1 } ( x ) - x ^ { 2 } + 1 = 0$.

Charlie uses the iterative formula $\mathrm { x } _ { \mathrm { n } + 1 } = \mathrm { g } \left( \mathrm { x } _ { \mathrm { n } } \right)$, where $\mathrm { g } \left( \mathrm { x } _ { \mathrm { n } } \right) = \sin \left( \mathrm { x } _ { \mathrm { n } } ^ { 2 } - 1 \right)$.\\
Two sections of the associated spreadsheet output, showing $x _ { 0 }$ to $x _ { 6 }$ and $x _ { 102 }$ to $x _ { 108 }$, are shown in Fig. 6.1.

\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}
\hline
$r$ & $\mathrm { x } _ { \mathrm { r } }$ & difference & ratio \\
\hline
0 & 0 &  &  \\
\hline
1 & -0.841471 & -0.84147 &  \\
\hline
2 & -0.287798 & 0.553673 & -0.65798 \\
\hline
3 & -0.793885 & -0.50609 & -0.91405 \\
\hline
4 & -0.361379 & 0.432507 & -0.85461 \\
\hline
5 & -0.763945 & -0.40257 & -0.93078 \\
\hline
6 & -0.404459 & 0.359486 & -0.89299 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}

\begin{table}[h]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}
\hline
102 & -0.596302 & 0.004626 & -0.95886 \\
\hline
103 & -0.600738 & -0.00444 & -0.95911 \\
\hline
104 & -0.596484 & 0.004254 & -0.95887 \\
\hline
105 & -0.600564 & -0.00408 & -0.95910 \\
\hline
106 & -0.596652 & 0.003912 & -0.95888 \\
\hline
107 & -0.600404 & -0.00375 & -0.95909 \\
\hline
108 & -0.596806 & 0.003598 & -0.95889 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\captionsetup{labelformat=empty}
\caption{Fig. 6.1}
\end{center}
\end{table}
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item Use the information in Fig. 6.1 to find the value of the root as accurately as you can, justifying the precision quoted.

The relaxed iteration $\mathrm { x } _ { \mathrm { n } + 1 } = ( 1 - \lambda ) \mathrm { x } _ { \mathrm { n } } + \lambda \mathrm { g } \left( \mathrm { x } _ { \mathrm { n } } \right)$, with $\lambda = 0.51$ and $x _ { 0 } = 0$, is to be used to find the root of the equation $\sin ^ { - 1 } ( x ) - x ^ { 2 } + 1 = 0$.
\item Complete the copy of Fig. 6.2 in the Printed Answer Booklet, giving the values of $\mathrm { x } _ { \mathrm { r } }$ correct to 7 decimal places and the values in the difference column and ratio column correct to 3 significant figures.

\begin{table}[h]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}
\hline
$r$ & $\mathrm { x } _ { \mathrm { r } }$ & difference & ratio \\
\hline
0 & 0 &  &  \\
\hline
1 &  &  &  \\
\hline
2 &  &  &  \\
\hline
3 &  &  &  \\
\hline
4 &  & -0.000192 &  \\
\hline
5 &  & $- 1.99 \times 10 ^ { - 7 }$ & 0.00103 \\
\hline
6 &  & $- 1.82 \times 10 ^ { - 10 }$ & 0.000914 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\captionsetup{labelformat=empty}
\caption{Fig. 6.2}
\end{center}
\end{table}
\item Write down the value of the root correct to 7 decimal places.
\item Explain why extrapolation could not be used in this case to find an improved approximation using this sequence of iterates.

In this case the method of relaxation has been used to speed up the convergence of an iterative scheme.
\item Name another application of the method of relaxation.
\end{enumerate}

\hfill \mbox{\textit{OCR MEI Further Numerical Methods 2022 Q6 [11]}}