OCR Further Additional Pure 2020 November — Question 1 5 marks

Exam BoardOCR
ModuleFurther Additional Pure (Further Additional Pure)
Year2020
SessionNovember
Marks5
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicGroups
TypeComplete or analyse Cayley table
DifficultyStandard +0.8 This is a Further Maths group theory question requiring completion of a Cayley table using the Latin square property and identifying why the structure fails to be a group. While the Latin square completion is systematic, it requires careful logical deduction across multiple entries, and recognizing the specific group axiom failure (likely lack of identity or associativity) demands solid understanding of abstract algebra concepts that are beyond standard A-level.
Spec8.03b Cayley tables: construct for finite sets under binary operation8.03c Group definition: recall and use, show structure is/isn't a group

1 The following Cayley table is for a set \(\{ a , b , c , d \}\) under a suitable binary operation.
\(a\)\(b\)\(c\)\(d\)
\(a\)\(b\)\(a\)
\(b\)
\(c\)\(c\)
\(d\)\(d\)\(a\)
  1. Given that the Latin square property holds for this Cayley table, complete it using the table supplied in the Printed Answer Booklet.
  2. Using your completed Cayley table, explain why the set does not form a group under the binary operation.

Question 1:
AnswerMarks Guidance
1(a) a b c d
a b d a c Column 1
b c a d b Column 3
c a b c d Any 3rd R or C
AnswerMarks
d d c b a All correctB1
B1
B1
B1
AnswerMarks
[4]3.1a
1.1
2.2a
1.1
AnswerMarks
(b)No – since c is the “left identity” but there is no “right identity”
Or there is no identity column
AnswerMarks Guidance
Or (ad)b = cb = b but a(db) = ac = a so op. not associativeB1
[1]2.4 Any valid reason (vague or unsupported claims
are not acceptable)
Question 1:
1 | (a) | a b c d
a b d a c Column 1
b c a d b Column 3
c a b c d Any 3rd R or C
d d c b a All correct | B1
B1
B1
B1
[4] | 3.1a
1.1
2.2a
1.1
(b) | No – since c is the “left identity” but there is no “right identity”
Or there is no identity column
Or (ad)b = cb = b but a(db) = ac = a so op. not associative | B1
[1] | 2.4 | Any valid reason (vague or unsupported claims
are not acceptable)
1 The following Cayley table is for a set $\{ a , b , c , d \}$ under a suitable binary operation.

\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{ | c | c | c | c | c | }
\hline
 & $a$ & $b$ & $c$ & $d$ \\
\hline
$a$ & $b$ &  & $a$ &  \\
\hline
$b$ &  &  &  &  \\
\hline
$c$ &  &  & $c$ &  \\
\hline
$d$ & $d$ &  &  & $a$ \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item Given that the Latin square property holds for this Cayley table, complete it using the table supplied in the Printed Answer Booklet.
\item Using your completed Cayley table, explain why the set does not form a group under the binary operation.
\end{enumerate}

\hfill \mbox{\textit{OCR Further Additional Pure 2020 Q1 [5]}}