Standard +0.3 This is a straightforward two-tailed binomial hypothesis test with clearly stated hypotheses (p=0.1 vs p≠0.1), requiring calculation of P(X≥19) under H₀, doubling for two-tailed test, and comparing to 5% significance level. All steps are standard procedure with no conceptual challenges, making it slightly easier than average.
12 A survey conducted in 2021 showed that 10\% of British adults were vegetarians.
A dietitian believes that the proportion of British adults who are vegetarians may have changed, so decides to conduct a hypothesis test at the \(5 \%\) level of significance.
In a random sample of 112 adults, the dietitian finds that there are 19 vegetarians.
Carry out the hypothesis test to determine whether there is any evidence to support the dietitian's belief.
\(p\) is the probability that a (British) adult (selected at random) is a vegetarian
B1
AO 2.5
\(P(X \geq k)\) found using \(B(112, 0.1)\), where \(k = 18, 19\) or \(20\)
M1*
AO 3.3
\([P(X \geq 19) =] 0.015 - 0.015331\)
A1
AO 1.1
their \(0.015\) correctly compared with \(0.025\) or their \(0.985\) correctly compared with \(0.975\)
M1dep*
AO 3.4
do not accept \(H_0\) or reject \(H_0\) or accept \(H_1\) or significant
A1FT
AO 1.1
sufficient evidence at the 5% level to suggest that the probability that an adult is vegetarian is not \(0.10\) oe
A1
AO 3.5a
*Alternatively, using critical region:*
Answer
Marks
Guidance
critical region is \(X \leq k \cup X \geq l\), \(X \geq k\) found from calculation of probability; allow \(k = 4\) or \(5\), \(l = 18, 19\) or \(20\)
M1*
[critical region is \(X] \geq 19\ \cup\ [X] \leq 4\)
A1
\(19\) correctly compared with their critical value
M1dep*
AO 3.4
do not accept \(H_0\) or reject \(H_0\) or accept \(H_1\) or significant
A1FT
AO 1.1
sufficient evidence at the 5% level to suggest that the probability that an adult is vegetarian is not \(0.10\) oe
A1
AO 3.5a
*Alternatively, using Normal approximation:*
Answer
Marks
Guidance
\(P(X \geq 18.5)\) or \(P(X \geq 19.5)\) found using \(N(11.2, 10.08)\)
M1*
or \(P(X \geq 19.5) = 0.00447(1)\)
Answer
Marks
Guidance
\([P(X \geq 18.5) =] 0.0107 - 0.011\)
A1
their \(0.0107\) correctly compared with \(0.025\) or their \(0.989\) correctly compared with \(0.975\)
M1dep*
do not accept \(H_0\) or reject \(H_0\) or accept \(H_1\) or significant
A1FT
sufficient evidence at the 5% level to suggest that the probability that an adult is vegetarian is not \(0.10\) oe
A1
AO 3.5a
## Question 12:
$H_0: p = 0.1$, $H_1: p \neq 0.1$ | B1 | AO 1.1 | allow equivalent in words; do not allow percentages; allow other variable only if correctly defined
$p$ is the probability that a (British) adult (selected at random) is a vegetarian | B1 | AO 2.5 | or $p$ is the proportion of adults that are vegetarian; **B1B1** if other symbol instead of $p$ used if correctly defined
$P(X \geq k)$ found using $B(112, 0.1)$, where $k = 18, 19$ or $20$ | M1* | AO 3.3 | may be implied by $P(X \geq 18) = 0.0295 - 0.030$ or $P(X \geq 19) = 0.015 - 0.015331$ or $P(X \geq 20) = 0.0075 - 0.00754$; **NB M0** for $P(X=19) = 0.00779$
$[P(X \geq 19) =] 0.015 - 0.015331$ | A1 | AO 1.1 | or $[P(X \leq 18) =] 0.984669 - 0.985$ or $0.98$
their $0.015$ correctly compared with $0.025$ **or** their $0.985$ correctly compared with $0.975$ | M1dep* | AO 3.4 |
do not accept $H_0$ **or** reject $H_0$ **or** accept $H_1$ **or** significant | A1FT | AO 1.1 | **A0** if their $0.015 > 0.025$ or their $0.985 < 0.975$
**sufficient evidence** at the 5% level to **suggest** that the **probability** that an adult is vegetarian **is not** $0.10$ **oe** | A1 | AO 3.5a | dependent on award of all other marks apart from second B1; do not allow e.g. conclude/prove/indicate or other assertive statement instead of suggest
---
*Alternatively, using critical region:*
critical region is $X \leq k \cup X \geq l$, $X \geq k$ found from calculation of probability; allow $k = 4$ or $5$, $l = 18, 19$ or $20$ | M1* | | allow calculation of upper tail only for M1
[critical region is $X] \geq 19\ \cup\ [X] \leq 4$ | A1 | | from $P(X \geq 19) = 0.015 - 0.015331$ and $P(X \leq 4) = 0.010$; must see both tails for A1
$19$ correctly compared with their critical value | M1dep* | AO 3.4 |
do not accept $H_0$ **or** reject $H_0$ **or** accept $H_1$ **or** significant | A1FT | AO 1.1 | **A0** if $19 <$ their critical value
**sufficient evidence** at the 5% level to **suggest** that the **probability** that an adult is vegetarian **is not** $0.10$ **oe** | A1 | AO 3.5a |
---
*Alternatively, using Normal approximation:*
$P(X \geq 18.5)$ or $P(X \geq 19.5)$ found using $N(11.2, 10.08)$ | M1* | | **NB M0** for $P(X=19) = 0.006145$
**or** $P(X \geq 19.5) = 0.00447(1)$
$[P(X \geq 18.5) =] 0.0107 - 0.011$ | A1 |
their $0.0107$ correctly compared with $0.025$ **or** their $0.989$ correctly compared with $0.975$ | M1dep* |
do not accept $H_0$ **or** reject $H_0$ **or** accept $H_1$ **or** significant | A1FT | | **A0** if their $0.0107 > 0.025$ or their $0.989 < 0.975$
**sufficient evidence** at the 5% level to **suggest** that the **probability** that an adult is vegetarian **is not** $0.10$ **oe** | A1 | AO 3.5a |
---
12 A survey conducted in 2021 showed that 10\% of British adults were vegetarians.
A dietitian believes that the proportion of British adults who are vegetarians may have changed, so decides to conduct a hypothesis test at the $5 \%$ level of significance.
In a random sample of 112 adults, the dietitian finds that there are 19 vegetarians.
Carry out the hypothesis test to determine whether there is any evidence to support the dietitian's belief.
\hfill \mbox{\textit{OCR MEI Paper 2 2024 Q12 [7]}}