OCR MEI Paper 2 2024 June — Question 12 7 marks

Exam BoardOCR MEI
ModulePaper 2 (Paper 2)
Year2024
SessionJune
Marks7
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicHypothesis test of binomial distributions
TypeTwo-tailed test critical region
DifficultyStandard +0.3 This is a straightforward two-tailed binomial hypothesis test with clearly stated hypotheses (p=0.1 vs p≠0.1), requiring calculation of P(X≥19) under H₀, doubling for two-tailed test, and comparing to 5% significance level. All steps are standard procedure with no conceptual challenges, making it slightly easier than average.
Spec2.05b Hypothesis test for binomial proportion2.05c Significance levels: one-tail and two-tail

12 A survey conducted in 2021 showed that 10\% of British adults were vegetarians. A dietitian believes that the proportion of British adults who are vegetarians may have changed, so decides to conduct a hypothesis test at the \(5 \%\) level of significance. In a random sample of 112 adults, the dietitian finds that there are 19 vegetarians. Carry out the hypothesis test to determine whether there is any evidence to support the dietitian's belief.

Question 12:
AnswerMarks Guidance
\(H_0: p = 0.1\), \(H_1: p \neq 0.1\)B1 AO 1.1
\(p\) is the probability that a (British) adult (selected at random) is a vegetarianB1 AO 2.5
\(P(X \geq k)\) found using \(B(112, 0.1)\), where \(k = 18, 19\) or \(20\)M1* AO 3.3
\([P(X \geq 19) =] 0.015 - 0.015331\)A1 AO 1.1
their \(0.015\) correctly compared with \(0.025\) or their \(0.985\) correctly compared with \(0.975\)M1dep* AO 3.4
do not accept \(H_0\) or reject \(H_0\) or accept \(H_1\) or significantA1FT AO 1.1
sufficient evidence at the 5% level to suggest that the probability that an adult is vegetarian is not \(0.10\) oeA1 AO 3.5a
*Alternatively, using critical region:*
AnswerMarks Guidance
critical region is \(X \leq k \cup X \geq l\), \(X \geq k\) found from calculation of probability; allow \(k = 4\) or \(5\), \(l = 18, 19\) or \(20\)M1*
[critical region is \(X] \geq 19\ \cup\ [X] \leq 4\)A1
\(19\) correctly compared with their critical valueM1dep* AO 3.4
do not accept \(H_0\) or reject \(H_0\) or accept \(H_1\) or significantA1FT AO 1.1
sufficient evidence at the 5% level to suggest that the probability that an adult is vegetarian is not \(0.10\) oeA1 AO 3.5a
*Alternatively, using Normal approximation:*
AnswerMarks Guidance
\(P(X \geq 18.5)\) or \(P(X \geq 19.5)\) found using \(N(11.2, 10.08)\)M1*
or \(P(X \geq 19.5) = 0.00447(1)\)
AnswerMarks Guidance
\([P(X \geq 18.5) =] 0.0107 - 0.011\)A1
their \(0.0107\) correctly compared with \(0.025\) or their \(0.989\) correctly compared with \(0.975\)M1dep*
do not accept \(H_0\) or reject \(H_0\) or accept \(H_1\) or significantA1FT
sufficient evidence at the 5% level to suggest that the probability that an adult is vegetarian is not \(0.10\) oeA1 AO 3.5a
## Question 12:

$H_0: p = 0.1$, $H_1: p \neq 0.1$ | B1 | AO 1.1 | allow equivalent in words; do not allow percentages; allow other variable only if correctly defined

$p$ is the probability that a (British) adult (selected at random) is a vegetarian | B1 | AO 2.5 | or $p$ is the proportion of adults that are vegetarian; **B1B1** if other symbol instead of $p$ used if correctly defined

$P(X \geq k)$ found using $B(112, 0.1)$, where $k = 18, 19$ or $20$ | M1* | AO 3.3 | may be implied by $P(X \geq 18) = 0.0295 - 0.030$ or $P(X \geq 19) = 0.015 - 0.015331$ or $P(X \geq 20) = 0.0075 - 0.00754$; **NB M0** for $P(X=19) = 0.00779$

$[P(X \geq 19) =] 0.015 - 0.015331$ | A1 | AO 1.1 | or $[P(X \leq 18) =] 0.984669 - 0.985$ or $0.98$

their $0.015$ correctly compared with $0.025$ **or** their $0.985$ correctly compared with $0.975$ | M1dep* | AO 3.4 |

do not accept $H_0$ **or** reject $H_0$ **or** accept $H_1$ **or** significant | A1FT | AO 1.1 | **A0** if their $0.015 > 0.025$ or their $0.985 < 0.975$

**sufficient evidence** at the 5% level to **suggest** that the **probability** that an adult is vegetarian **is not** $0.10$ **oe** | A1 | AO 3.5a | dependent on award of all other marks apart from second B1; do not allow e.g. conclude/prove/indicate or other assertive statement instead of suggest

---

*Alternatively, using critical region:*

critical region is $X \leq k \cup X \geq l$, $X \geq k$ found from calculation of probability; allow $k = 4$ or $5$, $l = 18, 19$ or $20$ | M1* | | allow calculation of upper tail only for M1

[critical region is $X] \geq 19\ \cup\ [X] \leq 4$ | A1 | | from $P(X \geq 19) = 0.015 - 0.015331$ and $P(X \leq 4) = 0.010$; must see both tails for A1

$19$ correctly compared with their critical value | M1dep* | AO 3.4 |

do not accept $H_0$ **or** reject $H_0$ **or** accept $H_1$ **or** significant | A1FT | AO 1.1 | **A0** if $19 <$ their critical value

**sufficient evidence** at the 5% level to **suggest** that the **probability** that an adult is vegetarian **is not** $0.10$ **oe** | A1 | AO 3.5a |

---

*Alternatively, using Normal approximation:*

$P(X \geq 18.5)$ or $P(X \geq 19.5)$ found using $N(11.2, 10.08)$ | M1* | | **NB M0** for $P(X=19) = 0.006145$

**or** $P(X \geq 19.5) = 0.00447(1)$

$[P(X \geq 18.5) =] 0.0107 - 0.011$ | A1 |

their $0.0107$ correctly compared with $0.025$ **or** their $0.989$ correctly compared with $0.975$ | M1dep* |

do not accept $H_0$ **or** reject $H_0$ **or** accept $H_1$ **or** significant | A1FT | | **A0** if their $0.0107 > 0.025$ or their $0.989 < 0.975$

**sufficient evidence** at the 5% level to **suggest** that the **probability** that an adult is vegetarian **is not** $0.10$ **oe** | A1 | AO 3.5a |

---
12 A survey conducted in 2021 showed that 10\% of British adults were vegetarians.

A dietitian believes that the proportion of British adults who are vegetarians may have changed, so decides to conduct a hypothesis test at the $5 \%$ level of significance.

In a random sample of 112 adults, the dietitian finds that there are 19 vegetarians.

Carry out the hypothesis test to determine whether there is any evidence to support the dietitian's belief.

\hfill \mbox{\textit{OCR MEI Paper 2 2024 Q12 [7]}}