AQA Paper 2 2024 June — Question 11 6 marks

Exam BoardAQA
ModulePaper 2 (Paper 2)
Year2024
SessionJune
Marks6
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicProof
TypeExistence of greatest/smallest element
DifficultyModerate -0.8 This question tests understanding of open intervals and proof by contradiction at a basic level. Part (a) requires only recognizing that 3 is not in the open interval (1 mark, trivial). Part (b)(i) asks students to explain a given contradiction (1 mark, straightforward). Part (b)(ii) requires adapting the given proof structure to show no largest value exists (4 marks), but the template is provided and the adaptation is mechanical—students just need to construct y=(x+4)/2 and show x<y<4. While proof by contradiction appears sophisticated, the question scaffolds heavily and requires minimal independent reasoning or problem-solving beyond pattern recognition.
Spec1.01a Proof: structure of mathematical proof and logical steps1.01d Proof by contradiction

  1. A student states that 3 is the smallest value of \(k\) in the interval \(3 < k < 4\) Explain the error in the student's statement. [1 mark]
  2. The student's teacher says there is no smallest value of \(k\) in the interval \(3 < k < 4\) The teacher gives the following correct proof: Step 1: Assume there is a smallest number in the interval \(3 < k < 4\) and let this smallest number be \(x\) Step 2: let \(y = \frac{3 + x}{2}\) Step 3: \(3 < y < x\) which is a contradiction. Step 4: Therefore, there is no smallest number in interval \(3 < k < 4\)
    1. Explain the contradiction stated in Step 3 [1 mark]
    2. Prove that there is no largest value of \(k\) in the interval \(3 < k < 4\) [4 marks]

Question 11:

AnswerMarks Guidance
11(a)Explains that 3 is not in 3 < k < 4
OE2.4 E1
Subtotal1
QMarking instructions AO

AnswerMarks
11(b)(i)Explains that 3 < y < x which
contradicts the definition of x as
AnswerMarks Guidance
the smallest value OE2.4 E1
the definition of x as the smallest
value in (3, 4)
AnswerMarks Guidance
Subtotal1
QMarking instructions AO

AnswerMarks
11(b)(ii)Assumes there is a largest value
in (3, 4)
AnswerMarks Guidance
OE2.1 B1
number in the interval 3 < k < 4 and
let this largest number be x
x+4
Step 2: let y =
2
Step 3: x < y < 4 which is a
contradiction.
Step 4: Therefore, there is no largest
value in 3 < k < 4
Constructs a value “y” in (3, 4)
which is greater than their “x”
Must have referenced their “x”
AnswerMarks Guidance
before this step2.2a B1
States that x < y < 4 which is a
contradiction
AnswerMarks Guidance
OE2.4 E1
Concludes that there is no
largest value in (3, 4)
OE
AnswerMarks Guidance
CSO2.1 R1
Subtotal4
Question 11 Total6
QMarking instructions AO
Question 11:
--- 11(a) ---
11(a) | Explains that 3 is not in 3 < k < 4
OE | 2.4 | E1 | 3 is not in the interval
Subtotal | 1
Q | Marking instructions | AO | Marks | Typical solution
--- 11(b)(i) ---
11(b)(i) | Explains that 3 < y < x which
contradicts the definition of x as
the smallest value OE | 2.4 | E1 | y is between 3 and x which contradicts
the definition of x as the smallest
value in (3, 4)
Subtotal | 1
Q | Marking instructions | AO | Marks | Typical solution
--- 11(b)(ii) ---
11(b)(ii) | Assumes there is a largest value
in (3, 4)
OE | 2.1 | B1 | Step 1: Assume there is a largest
number in the interval 3 < k < 4 and
let this largest number be x
x+4
Step 2: let y =
2
Step 3: x < y < 4 which is a
contradiction.
Step 4: Therefore, there is no largest
value in 3 < k < 4
Constructs a value “y” in (3, 4)
which is greater than their “x”
Must have referenced their “x”
before this step | 2.2a | B1
States that x < y < 4 which is a
contradiction
OE | 2.4 | E1
Concludes that there is no
largest value in (3, 4)
OE
CSO | 2.1 | R1
Subtotal | 4
Question 11 Total | 6
Q | Marking instructions | AO | Marks | Typical solution
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item A student states that 3 is the smallest value of $k$ in the interval $3 < k < 4$

Explain the error in the student's statement.
[1 mark]

\item The student's teacher says there is no smallest value of $k$ in the interval $3 < k < 4$

The teacher gives the following correct proof:

Step 1: Assume there is a smallest number in the interval $3 < k < 4$ and let this smallest number be $x$

Step 2: let $y = \frac{3 + x}{2}$

Step 3: $3 < y < x$ which is a contradiction.

Step 4: Therefore, there is no smallest number in interval $3 < k < 4$

\begin{enumerate}[label=(\roman*)]
\item Explain the contradiction stated in Step 3
[1 mark]

\item Prove that there is no largest value of $k$ in the interval $3 < k < 4$
[4 marks]
\end{enumerate}
\end{enumerate}

\hfill \mbox{\textit{AQA Paper 2 2024 Q11 [6]}}