OCR MEI AS Paper 2 2019 June — Question 8 10 marks

Exam BoardOCR MEI
ModuleAS Paper 2 (AS Paper 2)
Year2019
SessionJune
Marks10
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicHypothesis test of binomial distributions
TypeOne-tailed hypothesis test (upper tail, H₁: p > p₀)
DifficultyStandard +0.3 This is a straightforward one-tailed binomial hypothesis test with clearly stated hypotheses and significance level. Parts (a) and (b) provide scaffolding for the main test in (c), which follows a standard procedure: state hypotheses, find critical region or p-value, and conclude. The context is accessible and the calculations are routine for AS-level statistics, making it slightly easier than average.
Spec2.04b Binomial distribution: as model B(n,p)2.04c Calculate binomial probabilities2.05b Hypothesis test for binomial proportion2.05c Significance levels: one-tail and two-tail

8 According to the latest research there are 19.8 million male drivers and 16.2 million female drivers on the roads in the UK.
  1. A driver in the UK is selected at random. Find the probability that the driver is male.
  2. Calculate the probability that there are 7 female drivers in a random sample of 25 UK drivers. When driving in a built-up area, Rebecca exceeded the speed limit and was obliged to attend a speed awareness course. Her husband said "It's nearly always male drivers who are speeding." When Rebecca attends the course, she finds that there are 25 drivers, 7 of whom are female. You should assume that the drivers on the speed awareness course constitute a random sample of drivers caught speeding.
  3. In this question you must show detailed reasoning. Conduct a hypothesis test to determine whether there is any evidence at the \(5 \%\) level to suggest that male drivers are more likely to exceed the speed limit than female drivers.
  4. State a modelling assumption that is necessary in order to conduct the hypothesis test in part (c).

Question 8:
Part (a):
AnswerMarks Guidance
\(\left[\frac{19.8}{36} =\right] 0.55\)B1 or \(\frac{11}{20}\); must be decimal or simplified fraction; but condone 55%
Part (b):
AnswerMarks Guidance
\(0.0380\ (96943116\ldots)\) BCB1 Correct to at least 2 sf; allow truncated
Part (c):
AnswerMarks Guidance
\(H_0: p = 0.45\), \(H_1: p < 0.45\)B1 OR \(H_0: p = 0.55\), \(H_1: p > 0.55\); both hypotheses
\(p\) is the probability that a driver speeding/caught speeding/on speed awareness course is femaleB1\( Must not be inconsistent with \)H_1$
Use or sight of \(B(25, 0.45)\)M1* OR use or sight of \(B(25, 0.55)\); can be implied by \(P(X=7)\) (OR \(P(X=18)\)) \(= 0.038\ldots\)
\(P(X \leq 7) = 0.06385\ (0773831)\)A1 \(P(X \geq 18) = 1 - P(X \leq 17) = 1 - 0.936149 = 0.06385\)
\(0.06385 > 0.05\)*M1 FT their probability
Result is NOT significant or "accept \(H_0\)"B1 Dep on \(0.06385\); may be incorporated in conclusion
There is insufficient evidence (at the 5% level) to suggest that drivers speeding/caught speeding/on speed awareness course are more likely to be male oeE1 Dep all previous marks except B1$; not assertive
SC: Use of \(p = 0.5\) can score B1B1M1 (can be implied by \(0.0216\) or \(0.0143\)) A0M1B0E0
Part (d):
AnswerMarks Guidance
e.g. Each driver speeding/caught speeding has the same (constant) probability of being selected for the speed awareness courseE1 OR the probability of any particular driver caught speeding being selected for the speed awareness course is independent of any other driver caught speeding being selected
# Question 8:

## Part (a):
$\left[\frac{19.8}{36} =\right] 0.55$ | B1 | or $\frac{11}{20}$; must be decimal or simplified fraction; but condone 55%

## Part (b):
$0.0380\ (96943116\ldots)$ BC | B1 | Correct to at least 2 sf; allow truncated

## Part (c):
$H_0: p = 0.45$, $H_1: p < 0.45$ | B1 | OR $H_0: p = 0.55$, $H_1: p > 0.55$; both hypotheses
$p$ is the probability that a driver speeding/caught speeding/on speed awareness course is female | B1$ | Must not be inconsistent with $H_1$
Use or sight of $B(25, 0.45)$ | M1* | OR use or sight of $B(25, 0.55)$; can be implied by $P(X=7)$ (OR $P(X=18)$) $= 0.038\ldots$
$P(X \leq 7) = 0.06385\ (0773831)$ | A1 | $P(X \geq 18) = 1 - P(X \leq 17) = 1 - 0.936149 = 0.06385$
$0.06385 > 0.05$ | *M1 | FT their probability
Result is NOT significant or "accept $H_0$" | B1 | Dep on $0.06385$; may be incorporated in conclusion
There is insufficient evidence (at the 5% level) to suggest that drivers speeding/caught speeding/on speed awareness course are more likely to be male oe | E1 | Dep all previous marks except B1$; not assertive
| | SC: Use of $p = 0.5$ can score B1B1M1 (can be implied by $0.0216$ or $0.0143$) A0M1B0E0

## Part (d):
e.g. Each driver speeding/caught speeding has the same (constant) probability of being selected for the speed awareness course | E1 | OR the probability of any particular driver caught speeding being selected for the speed awareness course is independent of any other driver caught speeding being selected

---
8 According to the latest research there are 19.8 million male drivers and 16.2 million female drivers on the roads in the UK.
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item A driver in the UK is selected at random. Find the probability that the driver is male.
\item Calculate the probability that there are 7 female drivers in a random sample of 25 UK drivers.

When driving in a built-up area, Rebecca exceeded the speed limit and was obliged to attend a speed awareness course. Her husband said "It's nearly always male drivers who are speeding." When Rebecca attends the course, she finds that there are 25 drivers, 7 of whom are female. You should assume that the drivers on the speed awareness course constitute a random sample of drivers caught speeding.
\item In this question you must show detailed reasoning.

Conduct a hypothesis test to determine whether there is any evidence at the $5 \%$ level to suggest that male drivers are more likely to exceed the speed limit than female drivers.
\item State a modelling assumption that is necessary in order to conduct the hypothesis test in part (c).
\end{enumerate}

\hfill \mbox{\textit{OCR MEI AS Paper 2 2019 Q8 [10]}}