OCR MEI AS Paper 1 2023 June — Question 2 3 marks

Exam BoardOCR MEI
ModuleAS Paper 1 (AS Paper 1)
Year2023
SessionJune
Marks3
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicTrigonometric equations in context
TypeTrig equation from real-world model
DifficultyModerate -0.3 Part (a) is direct substitution into a given formula. Part (b) requires understanding that cos(6x) completes multiple periods over the domain 0≤x≤40, making it slightly more conceptual than pure calculation, but this is still a straightforward AS-level question testing basic understanding of periodic functions rather than solving equations.
Spec1.05f Trigonometric function graphs: symmetries and periodicities1.05g Exact trigonometric values: for standard angles

2 The height of the first part of a rollercoaster track is \(h \mathrm {~m}\) at a horizontal distance of \(x \mathrm {~m}\) from the start. A student models this using the equation \(h = 17 + 15 \cos 6 x\), for \(0 \leqslant x \leqslant 40\), using the values of \(h\) given when their calculator is set to work in degrees.
  1. Find the height that the student's model predicts when the horizontal distance from the start is 40 m .
  2. The student argues that the model predicts that the rollercoaster track will achieve a maximum height of 32 m more than once because the cosine function is periodic. Comment on the validity of the student's argument.

Question 2:
(a)
AnswerMarks Guidance
Substitute \(x = 40\), \(h = 17 + 15\cos240 = 9.5\) mB1 cao
(b)
AnswerMarks Guidance
Maximum when \(6x = 0\) or \(360\) so \(x = 0, 60\)M1 Must include reference to either 60 or 240 or a sketch illustrating the \(x\)-direction stretch. Allow if wrong conclusion reached. Do not allow argument based on mechanics principles alone.
But the model is only valid for \(0 \leq x \leq 40\), so Tom's argument is invalid.E1 Clear argument
## Question 2:

**(a)**

Substitute $x = 40$, $h = 17 + 15\cos240 = 9.5$ m | B1 | cao

**(b)**

Maximum when $6x = 0$ or $360$ so $x = 0, 60$ | M1 | Must include reference to either 60 or 240 or a sketch illustrating the $x$-direction stretch. Allow if wrong conclusion reached. Do not allow argument based on mechanics principles alone.

But the model is only valid for $0 \leq x \leq 40$, so Tom's argument is invalid. | E1 | Clear argument

---
2 The height of the first part of a rollercoaster track is $h \mathrm {~m}$ at a horizontal distance of $x \mathrm {~m}$ from the start. A student models this using the equation $h = 17 + 15 \cos 6 x$, for $0 \leqslant x \leqslant 40$, using the values of $h$ given when their calculator is set to work in degrees.
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item Find the height that the student's model predicts when the horizontal distance from the start is 40 m .
\item The student argues that the model predicts that the rollercoaster track will achieve a maximum height of 32 m more than once because the cosine function is periodic.

Comment on the validity of the student's argument.
\end{enumerate}

\hfill \mbox{\textit{OCR MEI AS Paper 1 2023 Q2 [3]}}