| Exam Board | Edexcel |
|---|---|
| Module | D2 (Decision Mathematics 2) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Session | June |
| Marks | 11 |
| Paper | Download PDF ↗ |
| Mark scheme | Download PDF ↗ |
| Topic | Matchings and Allocation |
| Type | Transportation problem: stepping-stone method |
| Difficulty | Moderate -0.5 This is a standard algorithmic application of the north-west corner method and stepping-stone method with clear instructions. While it requires careful bookkeeping across multiple iterations, it follows a mechanical procedure taught directly in D2 with no novel problem-solving or insight required—making it slightly easier than average for A-level. |
| Spec | 7.07a Simplex tableau: initial setup in standard format |
| A | B | C | D | Supply | |
| X | 28 | 20 | 19 | 16 | 53 |
| Y | 15 | 12 | 14 | 17 | 47 |
| Demand | 18 | 31 | 22 | 29 |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
| Initial basic feasible solution stated | 1B1 | cao |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
| 6 shadow costs and precisely 3 improvement indices stated | 1M1 | No extra zeros |
| Correct shadow costs and improvement indices | 1A1 | cao |
| Valid route chosen using negative II, only one empty square used, \(\theta\)'s balance | 2M1 | |
| Improved solution | 2A1ft | No extra zeros |
| 6 shadow costs and precisely 3 improvement indices stated | 3M1ft | No extra zeros |
| Correct values | 3A1 | cao |
| Valid route chosen using negative II, only one empty square used, \(\theta\)'s balance | 4M1ft | |
| Improved solution | 4A1ft | No extra zeros |
| 6 shadow costs and precisely 3 improvement indices (or 1 negative improvement index) stated | 5A1=5M1 | No extra zeros |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
| Conclusion that solution is optimal | 1B1ft = 1A1ft | cao; must follow from at least one negative II in a third 'set' of IIs |
# Question 3:
## Part (a)
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|--------|-------|----------|
| Initial basic feasible solution stated | 1B1 | cao |
## Part (b)
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|--------|-------|----------|
| 6 shadow costs and precisely 3 improvement indices stated | 1M1 | No extra zeros |
| Correct shadow costs and improvement indices | 1A1 | cao |
| Valid route chosen using negative II, only one empty square used, $\theta$'s balance | 2M1 | |
| Improved solution | 2A1ft | No extra zeros |
| 6 shadow costs and precisely 3 improvement indices stated | 3M1ft | No extra zeros |
| Correct values | 3A1 | cao |
| Valid route chosen using negative II, only one empty square used, $\theta$'s balance | 4M1ft | |
| Improved solution | 4A1ft | No extra zeros |
| 6 shadow costs and precisely 3 improvement indices (or 1 negative improvement index) stated | 5A1=5M1 | No extra zeros |
**Misread working (not choosing most negative):**
*Entering cell XD:*
- Route: $X$: $18, 31, 4-\theta, \theta$; $Y$: $18+\theta, 29-\theta$
- Exiting cell XC, $\theta=4$
- Improved solution: $X$: $18, 31, -, 4$; $Y$: $-, -, 22, 25$
- Shadow costs: $28, 20, 13, 16$; IIs: $XC=6$, $YA=-14$, $YB=-9$
*Or entering cell YB:*
- Route: $X$: $18, 31-\theta, 4+\theta$; $Y$: $\theta, 18-\theta, 29$
- Exiting cell YC, $\theta=18$
- Improved solution: $X$: $18, 13, 22$; $Y$: $18, -, 29$
- Shadow costs: $28, 20, 19, 25$; IIs: $XD=-9$, $YA=-5$, $YC=3$
Candidates can get: 2M1 2A1 for first route and improved solution; 3M1 3A0 for 6 shadow costs and 3 IIs; 4M1 for valid route, 4A1 if route leads to improved solution [A0 for 6 shadow costs and 3 IIs as CAO]
## Part (c)
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|--------|-------|----------|
| Conclusion that solution is optimal | 1B1ft = 1A1ft | cao; must follow from at least one negative II in a third 'set' of IIs |
---
3. The table below shows the cost of transporting one block of staging from each of two supply points, X and Y , to each of four concert venues, $\mathrm { A } , \mathrm { B } , \mathrm { C }$ and D . It also shows the number of blocks held at each supply point and the number of blocks required at each concert venue. A minimal cost solution is required.
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{ | c | c | c | c | c | c | }
\hline
& A & B & C & D & Supply \\
\hline
X & 28 & 20 & 19 & 16 & 53 \\
\hline
Y & 15 & 12 & 14 & 17 & 47 \\
\hline
Demand & 18 & 31 & 22 & 29 & \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item Use the north-west corner method to obtain a possible solution.\\
(1)
\item Taking the most negative improvement index to indicate the entering square, use the stepping stone method twice to obtain an improved solution. You must make your method clear by stating your shadow costs, improvement indices, routes, entering cells and exiting cells.
\item Is your current solution optimal? Give a reason for your answer.\\
(1)
\end{enumerate}
\hfill \mbox{\textit{Edexcel D2 2010 Q3 [11]}}