Standard +0.8 This is a two-sample t-test with unequal sample sizes requiring calculation of pooled variance, manual computation of summary statistics from raw data, and proper hypothesis test execution. While methodical, it demands careful arithmetic, understanding of pooled variance formula, and correct application of t-distribution critical values—more demanding than standard single-sample tests but follows established procedures without requiring novel insight.
6 A company manufactures copper pipes. The pipes are produced by two different machines, \(A\) and \(B\). An inspector claims that the mean diameter of the pipes produced by machine \(A\) is greater than the mean diameter of the pipes produced by machine \(B\). He takes a random sample of 12 pipes produced by machine \(A\) and measures their diameters, \(x \mathrm {~cm}\). His results are summarised as follows.
$$\sum x = 6.24 \quad \sum x ^ { 2 } = 3.26$$
He also takes a random sample of 10 pipes produced by machine \(B\) and measures their diameters in cm. His results are as follows.
$$\begin{array} { l l l l l l l l l l }
0.48 & 0.53 & 0.47 & 0.54 & 0.54 & 0.55 & 0.46 & 0.55 & 0.50 & 0.48
\end{array}$$
The diameters of the pipes produced by each machine are assumed to be normally distributed with equal population variances.
Test at the \(2.5 \%\) significance level whether the data supports the inspector's claim.
If you use the following page to complete the answer to any question, the question number must be clearly shown.
6 A company manufactures copper pipes. The pipes are produced by two different machines, $A$ and $B$. An inspector claims that the mean diameter of the pipes produced by machine $A$ is greater than the mean diameter of the pipes produced by machine $B$. He takes a random sample of 12 pipes produced by machine $A$ and measures their diameters, $x \mathrm {~cm}$. His results are summarised as follows.
$$\sum x = 6.24 \quad \sum x ^ { 2 } = 3.26$$
He also takes a random sample of 10 pipes produced by machine $B$ and measures their diameters in cm. His results are as follows.
$$\begin{array} { l l l l l l l l l l }
0.48 & 0.53 & 0.47 & 0.54 & 0.54 & 0.55 & 0.46 & 0.55 & 0.50 & 0.48
\end{array}$$
The diameters of the pipes produced by each machine are assumed to be normally distributed with equal population variances.
Test at the $2.5 \%$ significance level whether the data supports the inspector's claim.\\
If you use the following page to complete the answer to any question, the question number must be clearly shown.\\
\hfill \mbox{\textit{CAIE Further Paper 4 2022 Q6 [9]}}