OCR MEI Further Numerical Methods 2021 November — Question 7 15 marks

Exam BoardOCR MEI
ModuleFurther Numerical Methods (Further Numerical Methods)
Year2021
SessionNovember
Marks15
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicNumerical integration
TypeSimpson's rule application
DifficultyStandard +0.8 This Further Maths numerical methods question requires understanding trapezium rule mechanics (part a), error analysis and convergence theory (parts b-c), Simpson's rule formula derivation (part d), and Richardson extrapolation (part f). While individual parts are accessible, the combination of theoretical understanding of convergence orders, practical spreadsheet implementation, and multi-method comparison elevates this above standard A-level. The ratio analysis requiring knowledge that ~0.36 ≈ 1/4 indicates O(h²) convergence is non-trivial.
Spec1.09f Trapezium rule: numerical integration

7 Sarah uses the trapezium rule to find a sequence of approximations to \(\int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } \sqrt { \tanh ( x ) } \mathrm { d } x\).
Her spreadsheet output is shown in Fig. 7.1. \begin{table}[h]
\(n\)\(T _ { n }\)differenceratio
10.43634681
20.55806940.121723
40.601998430.0439290.36089
80.617870730.0158720.36132
160.623576010.0057050.35945
320.625617160.0020410.35777
\captionsetup{labelformat=empty} \caption{Fig. 7.1}
\end{table}
  1. Write down the value of \(h\) used to find the approximation 0.62357601 .
  2. Without doing any further calculation, state the value of \(\int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } \sqrt { \tanh ( x ) } \mathrm { d } x\) as accurately as you
    can, justifying the precision quoted.
  3. Explain what the values in the ratio column tell you about the order of convergence of this sequence of approximations. Sarah carries out further work using the midpoint rule and Simpson's rule. Her results are shown in Fig. 7.2. \begin{table}[h]
    MNOPQR
    1\(n\)\(T _ { n }\)\(M _ { n }\)\(S _ { 2 n }\)differenceratio
    210.436346810.6797920.5986436
    320.55806940.645927450.616641440.018
    440.601998430.633743040.62316150.006520.362269
    580.617870730.629281290.625477770.002320.355253
    6160.623576010.627658310.626297550.000820.35392
    7320.625617160.62707259
    \captionsetup{labelformat=empty} \caption{Fig. 7.2}
    \end{table}
  4. Write down an efficient spreadsheet formula for calculating \(S _ { 16 }\).
  5. Determine the missing values in row 7.
  6. Use extrapolation to determine the value of \(\int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } \sqrt { \tanh ( x ) } d x\) as accurately as you can, justifying
    the precision quoted.
    [0pt] [6]

Question 7:
AnswerMarks Guidance
7(a) isw or 0.0625 isw
1
AnswerMarks Guidance
16B1 2.2a
[1]
AnswerMarks Guidance
7(b) by comparison of T and T
16 32
AnswerMarks Guidance
0.6 is certain or 0.63 is probableB1 2.2b
[1]
0.5
0.4764669
0.4528879
0.4293074
0.4057756
0.3823498
0.1116318
0.1111278
0.1110835
0.1110821
0.1110821
AnswerMarks Guidance
7(c) r appears to be between 0.25 and 0.5
so order of convergence is between 1st and 2nd
AnswerMarks
orderB1
B12.2b
2.2b
Alternative
AnswerMarks
r > 0.25 so convergence slower than 2nd orderB1
r < 0.5 so convergence faster than 1st orderB1
[2]
AnswerMarks Guidance
7(d) or soi
2𝑀𝑀𝑛𝑛+𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛 4𝑇𝑇2𝑛𝑛−𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛
3 3
AnswerMarks
= (2*O5 + N5)/3 or =(4*N6 ‒ N5)/3M1
A11.1
1.1must see =
[2]
AnswerMarks Guidance
7(e) awrt 0.62658745
awrt 0.00029
AnswerMarks
awrt 0.354B1
B1
AnswerMarks
B11.1
1.1
1.1
[3]
AnswerMarks Guidance
7(f) S and difference from table used in
2n
extrapolation
awrt 0.62658745 and awrt 0.00029 used
𝑟𝑟
0 .62658745+ 0.00029 ×1−𝑟𝑟
awrt 0.62674355 to awrt 0.62675058
comparison with their S
64
AnswerMarks
0.6267 is secureM1
A1
A1
A1
M1
AnswerMarks
A13.1a
1.1
1.1
1.1
3.2a
AnswerMarks
2.2beg their 0.62658745 and their 0.00029
may see more dp for difference
0.35 ≤ r ≤ 0.36
or 0.62675 is possible; allow 0.626746
the last two A marks are only available
if answers obtained from extrapolation
to infinity from S
AnswerMarks
64If M0 allow SC2 for
awrt 0.626607 obtained
from
16×0.62658745−0.62629755
15
then SC1 for 0.627
obtained from comparison
with S
64
[6]
PMT
OCR (Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations)
The Triangle Building
Shaftesbury Road
Cambridge
CB2 8EA
OCR Customer Contact Centre
Education and Learning
Telephone: 01223 553998
Facsimile: 01223 552627
Email: general.qualifications@ocr.org.uk
www.ocr.org.uk
For staff training purposes and as part of our quality assurance programme your call may be
recorded or monitored
Question 7:
7 | (a) | isw or 0.0625 isw
1
16 | B1 | 2.2a
[1]
7 | (b) | by comparison of T and T
16 32
0.6 is certain or 0.63 is probable | B1 | 2.2b
[1]
0.5
0.4764669
0.4528879
0.4293074
0.4057756
0.3823498
0.1116318
0.1111278
0.1110835
0.1110821
0.1110821
7 | (c) | r appears to be between 0.25 and 0.5
so order of convergence is between 1st and 2nd
order | B1
B1 | 2.2b
2.2b
Alternative
r > 0.25 so convergence slower than 2nd order | B1
r < 0.5 so convergence faster than 1st order | B1
[2]
7 | (d) | or soi
2𝑀𝑀𝑛𝑛+𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛 4𝑇𝑇2𝑛𝑛−𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛
3 3
= (2*O5 + N5)/3 or =(4*N6 ‒ N5)/3 | M1
A1 | 1.1
1.1 | must see =
[2]
7 | (e) | awrt 0.62658745
awrt 0.00029
awrt 0.354 | B1
B1
B1 | 1.1
1.1
1.1
[3]
7 | (f) | S and difference from table used in
2n
extrapolation
awrt 0.62658745 and awrt 0.00029 used
𝑟𝑟
0 .62658745+ 0.00029 ×1−𝑟𝑟
awrt 0.62674355 to awrt 0.62675058
comparison with their S
64
0.6267 is secure | M1
A1
A1
A1
M1
A1 | 3.1a
1.1
1.1
1.1
3.2a
2.2b | eg their 0.62658745 and their 0.00029
may see more dp for difference
0.35 ≤ r ≤ 0.36
or 0.62675 is possible; allow 0.626746
the last two A marks are only available
if answers obtained from extrapolation
to infinity from S
64 | If M0 allow SC2 for
awrt 0.626607 obtained
from
16×0.62658745−0.62629755
15
then SC1 for 0.627
obtained from comparison
with S
64
[6]
PMT
OCR (Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations)
The Triangle Building
Shaftesbury Road
Cambridge
CB2 8EA
OCR Customer Contact Centre
Education and Learning
Telephone: 01223 553998
Facsimile: 01223 552627
Email: general.qualifications@ocr.org.uk
www.ocr.org.uk
For staff training purposes and as part of our quality assurance programme your call may be
recorded or monitored
7 Sarah uses the trapezium rule to find a sequence of approximations to $\int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } \sqrt { \tanh ( x ) } \mathrm { d } x$.\\
Her spreadsheet output is shown in Fig. 7.1.

\begin{table}[h]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{ | l | l | l | c | }
\hline
$n$ & \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{$T _ { n }$} & difference & ratio \\
\hline
1 & 0.43634681 &  &  \\
\hline
2 & 0.5580694 & 0.121723 &  \\
\hline
4 & 0.60199843 & 0.043929 & 0.36089 \\
\hline
8 & 0.61787073 & 0.015872 & 0.36132 \\
\hline
16 & 0.62357601 & 0.005705 & 0.35945 \\
\hline
32 & 0.62561716 & 0.002041 & 0.35777 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\captionsetup{labelformat=empty}
\caption{Fig. 7.1}
\end{center}
\end{table}
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item Write down the value of $h$ used to find the approximation 0.62357601 .
\item Without doing any further calculation, state the value of $\int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } \sqrt { \tanh ( x ) } \mathrm { d } x$ as accurately as you\\
can, justifying the precision quoted.
\item Explain what the values in the ratio column tell you about the order of convergence of this sequence of approximations.

Sarah carries out further work using the midpoint rule and Simpson's rule. Her results are shown in Fig. 7.2.

\begin{table}[h]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|}
\hline
 & M & N & O & P & Q & R \\
\hline
1 & $n$ & $T _ { n }$ & $M _ { n }$ & $S _ { 2 n }$ & difference & ratio \\
\hline
2 & 1 & 0.43634681 & 0.679792 & 0.5986436 &  &  \\
\hline
3 & 2 & 0.5580694 & 0.64592745 & 0.61664144 & 0.018 &  \\
\hline
4 & 4 & 0.60199843 & 0.63374304 & 0.6231615 & 0.00652 & 0.362269 \\
\hline
5 & 8 & 0.61787073 & 0.62928129 & 0.62547777 & 0.00232 & 0.355253 \\
\hline
6 & 16 & 0.62357601 & 0.62765831 & 0.62629755 & 0.00082 & 0.35392 \\
\hline
7 & 32 & 0.62561716 & 0.62707259 &  &  &  \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\captionsetup{labelformat=empty}
\caption{Fig. 7.2}
\end{center}
\end{table}
\item Write down an efficient spreadsheet formula for calculating $S _ { 16 }$.
\item Determine the missing values in row 7.
\item Use extrapolation to determine the value of $\int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } \sqrt { \tanh ( x ) } d x$ as accurately as you can, justifying\\
the precision quoted.\\[0pt]
[6]
\end{enumerate}

\hfill \mbox{\textit{OCR MEI Further Numerical Methods 2021 Q7 [15]}}