CAIE P3 2023 June — Question 11 9 marks

Exam BoardCAIE
ModuleP3 (Pure Mathematics 3)
Year2023
SessionJune
Marks9
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicVectors: Cross Product & Distances
TypeFind foot of perpendicular from point to line
DifficultyStandard +0.3 This is a standard vectors question requiring routine techniques: (a) showing lines don't intersect by checking if direction vectors are parallel or finding if a consistent parameter exists, and (b) finding foot of perpendicular using dot product condition. Both parts follow textbook methods with straightforward algebra, making it slightly easier than average for A-level Further Maths.
Spec1.10b Vectors in 3D: i,j,k notation4.04a Line equations: 2D and 3D, cartesian and vector forms4.04e Line intersections: parallel, skew, or intersecting

11 The points \(A\) and \(B\) have position vectors \(\mathbf { i } + 2 \mathbf { j } - 2 \mathbf { k }\) and \(2 \mathbf { i } - \mathbf { j } + \mathbf { k }\) respectively. The line \(l\) has equation \(\mathbf { r } = \mathbf { i } - \mathbf { j } + 3 \mathbf { k } + \mu ( 2 \mathbf { i } - 3 \mathbf { j } + 4 \mathbf { k } )\).
  1. Show that \(l\) does not intersect the line passing through \(A\) and \(B\).
  2. Find the position vector of the foot of the perpendicular from \(A\) to \(l\).
    If you use the following lined page to complete the answer(s) to any question(s), the question number(s) must be clearly shown.

Question 11(a):
AnswerMarks Guidance
AnswerMark Guidance
Carry out correct method for finding vector equation for \(AB\)M1
Obtain \([\mathbf{r} =]\, \mathbf{i} + 2\mathbf{j} - 2\mathbf{k} + \lambda(\mathbf{i} - 3\mathbf{j} + 3\mathbf{k})\)A1 OE e.g. \(\mathbf{r} = 2\mathbf{i} - \mathbf{j} + \mathbf{k} + \lambda(-\mathbf{i}+3\mathbf{j}-3\mathbf{k})\)
Equate two pairs of components of general points on their \(AB\) and \(l\) and evaluate \(\lambda\) or \(\mu\)M1 \(\begin{pmatrix}1+\lambda\\2-3\lambda\\-2+3\lambda\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}1+2\mu\\-1-3\mu\\3+4\mu\end{pmatrix}\)
Obtain correct answer for \(\lambda\) or \(\mu\), e.g. \(\lambda = -1\), \(\mu = -2\)A1 Correct value from two correct component equations
Verify that all three equations are not satisfied and lines fail to intersect (\(\neq\) is sufficient justification e.g. \(0 \neq -3\))A1 Conclusion needs to follow correct values. Hybrid versions possible using j and k to get one parameter then i for the other, or solving two pairs of simultaneous equations and showing results are not the same
Question 11(b):
AnswerMarks Guidance
AnswerMark Guidance
Find \(\overrightarrow{AP}\) for general point \(P\) on \(l\), e.g. \(-3\mathbf{j} + 5\mathbf{k} + \mu(2\mathbf{i} - 3\mathbf{j} + 4\mathbf{k})\)B1 Or equivalent e.g. \(\overrightarrow{PA} = -2\mu\mathbf{i} + (3\mu+3)\mathbf{j} - (4\mu+5)\mathbf{k}\)
Calculate scalar product of their \(\overrightarrow{AP}\) and direction vector of \(l\) and equate to zeroM1 e.g. \(4\mu + (9+9\mu) + (20+16\mu) = 0\). M0 if using \(\overrightarrow{OP}\). M0 if using parallel line through \(A\)
Obtain \(\mu = -1\)A1
Obtain answer \(-\mathbf{i} + 2\mathbf{j} - \mathbf{k}\)A1 Accept coordinates in place of position vector
Alternative Method for 11(b):
AnswerMarks Guidance
AnswerMark Guidance
Find \(\overrightarrow{AP}\) for general point \(P\) on \(l\), e.g. \(-3\mathbf{j} + 5\mathbf{k} + \mu(2\mathbf{i} - 3\mathbf{j} + 4\mathbf{k})\)B1 Or equivalent e.g. \(\overrightarrow{PA} = -2\mu\mathbf{i} + (3\mu+3)\mathbf{j} - (4\mu+5)\mathbf{k}\)
Use Pythagoras and differentiate w.r.t. \(\mu\) to obtain value of \(\mu\) corresponding to minimum distance (no need to prove minimum)M1 \(\frac{d}{d\mu}\left(4\mu^2 + 9(\mu+1)^2 + (4\mu+5)^2\right) = 0\)
Obtain \(\mu = -1\)A1
Obtain answer \(-\mathbf{i} + 2\mathbf{j} - \mathbf{k}\)A1 Accept coordinates in place of position vector
## Question 11(a):

| Answer | Mark | Guidance |
|--------|------|----------|
| Carry out correct method for finding vector equation for $AB$ | M1 | |
| Obtain $[\mathbf{r} =]\, \mathbf{i} + 2\mathbf{j} - 2\mathbf{k} + \lambda(\mathbf{i} - 3\mathbf{j} + 3\mathbf{k})$ | A1 | OE e.g. $\mathbf{r} = 2\mathbf{i} - \mathbf{j} + \mathbf{k} + \lambda(-\mathbf{i}+3\mathbf{j}-3\mathbf{k})$ |
| Equate two pairs of components of general points on their $AB$ and $l$ and evaluate $\lambda$ or $\mu$ | M1 | $\begin{pmatrix}1+\lambda\\2-3\lambda\\-2+3\lambda\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}1+2\mu\\-1-3\mu\\3+4\mu\end{pmatrix}$ |
| Obtain correct answer for $\lambda$ or $\mu$, e.g. $\lambda = -1$, $\mu = -2$ | A1 | Correct value from two correct component equations |
| Verify that all three equations are not satisfied and lines fail to intersect ($\neq$ is sufficient justification e.g. $0 \neq -3$) | A1 | Conclusion needs to follow correct values. Hybrid versions possible using **j** and **k** to get one parameter then **i** for the other, or solving two pairs of simultaneous equations and showing results are not the same |

---

## Question 11(b):

| Answer | Mark | Guidance |
|--------|------|----------|
| Find $\overrightarrow{AP}$ for general point $P$ on $l$, e.g. $-3\mathbf{j} + 5\mathbf{k} + \mu(2\mathbf{i} - 3\mathbf{j} + 4\mathbf{k})$ | B1 | Or equivalent e.g. $\overrightarrow{PA} = -2\mu\mathbf{i} + (3\mu+3)\mathbf{j} - (4\mu+5)\mathbf{k}$ |
| Calculate scalar product of their $\overrightarrow{AP}$ and direction vector of $l$ and equate to zero | M1 | e.g. $4\mu + (9+9\mu) + (20+16\mu) = 0$. M0 if using $\overrightarrow{OP}$. M0 if using parallel line through $A$ |
| Obtain $\mu = -1$ | A1 | |
| Obtain answer $-\mathbf{i} + 2\mathbf{j} - \mathbf{k}$ | A1 | Accept coordinates in place of position vector |

**Alternative Method for 11(b):**

| Answer | Mark | Guidance |
|--------|------|----------|
| Find $\overrightarrow{AP}$ for general point $P$ on $l$, e.g. $-3\mathbf{j} + 5\mathbf{k} + \mu(2\mathbf{i} - 3\mathbf{j} + 4\mathbf{k})$ | B1 | Or equivalent e.g. $\overrightarrow{PA} = -2\mu\mathbf{i} + (3\mu+3)\mathbf{j} - (4\mu+5)\mathbf{k}$ |
| Use Pythagoras and differentiate w.r.t. $\mu$ to obtain value of $\mu$ corresponding to minimum distance (no need to prove minimum) | M1 | $\frac{d}{d\mu}\left(4\mu^2 + 9(\mu+1)^2 + (4\mu+5)^2\right) = 0$ |
| Obtain $\mu = -1$ | A1 | |
| Obtain answer $-\mathbf{i} + 2\mathbf{j} - \mathbf{k}$ | A1 | Accept coordinates in place of position vector |
11 The points $A$ and $B$ have position vectors $\mathbf { i } + 2 \mathbf { j } - 2 \mathbf { k }$ and $2 \mathbf { i } - \mathbf { j } + \mathbf { k }$ respectively. The line $l$ has equation $\mathbf { r } = \mathbf { i } - \mathbf { j } + 3 \mathbf { k } + \mu ( 2 \mathbf { i } - 3 \mathbf { j } + 4 \mathbf { k } )$.
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item Show that $l$ does not intersect the line passing through $A$ and $B$.
\item Find the position vector of the foot of the perpendicular from $A$ to $l$.\\

If you use the following lined page to complete the answer(s) to any question(s), the question number(s) must be clearly shown.
\end{enumerate}

\hfill \mbox{\textit{CAIE P3 2023 Q11 [9]}}