CAIE P3 2023 June — Question 6 7 marks

Exam BoardCAIE
ModuleP3 (Pure Mathematics 3)
Year2023
SessionJune
Marks7
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicFixed Point Iteration
TypeShow convergence to specific root
DifficultyStandard +0.8 This is a multi-part fixed point iteration question requiring: (a) interval verification using cotangent evaluation, (b) algebraic proof that the iteration formula converges to the root by rearranging cot(x/2)=3x into the given form, and (c) numerical iteration to 2dp. The rearrangement in part (b) involves non-trivial manipulation of inverse trigonometric functions and the half-angle relationship, making it more challenging than standard iteration questions that simply verify g'(α)<1.
Spec1.05i Inverse trig functions: arcsin, arccos, arctan domains and graphs1.09a Sign change methods: locate roots1.09c Simple iterative methods: x_{n+1} = g(x_n), cobweb and staircase diagrams

6 The equation \(\cot \frac { 1 } { 2 } x = 3 x\) has one root in the interval \(0 < x < \pi\), denoted by \(\alpha\).
  1. Show by calculation that \(\alpha\) lies between 0.5 and 1 .
  2. Show that, if a sequence of positive values given by the iterative formula $$x _ { n + 1 } = \frac { 1 } { 3 } \left( x _ { n } + 4 \tan ^ { - 1 } \left( \frac { 1 } { 3 x _ { n } } \right) \right)$$ converges, then it converges to \(\alpha\).
  3. Use this iterative formula to calculate \(\alpha\) correct to 2 decimal places. Give the result of each iteration to 4 decimal places.

Question 6(a):
AnswerMarks Guidance
AnswerMark Guidance
Calculate the values of a relevant expression or pair of expressions at \(x = 0.5\) and \(x = 1\)M1 Need to evaluate at both points, but M1 still available if one value incorrect. Use of degrees is M0. Correct use of a smaller interval is M1. If using \(g(x) - f(x)\), there needs to be a clear indication of the comparison being made e.g. by listing values in a table. Embedded values 0.5 and 1 are not sufficient. 3.92 and 1.83 alone are not sufficient
Complete the argument correctly with conclusion about change of sign or change of inequalities and with correct calculated values. Can all be in symbols – explanation in words is not requiredA1 e.g. \(3.92 > 1.5\), \(1.83 < 3\) or \(2.42 > 0\), \(-1.17 < 0\)
Total: 2
Question 6(b):
AnswerMarks Guidance
AnswerMark Guidance
State \(x = \frac{1}{3}\left(x + 4\tan^{-1}\frac{1}{3x}\right)\)M1 Or rearrange \(\cot\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) = 3x\) as far as \(2x = 4\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{3x}\right)\)
Rearrange to the given equation \(\cot\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) = 3x\)A1 Or continue rearrangement to \(x = \frac{1}{3}\left(x + 4\tan^{-1}\frac{1}{3x}\right)\) and state iterative formula of \(x_{n+1} = \frac{1}{3}\left(x_n + 4\tan^{-1}\frac{1}{3x_n}\right)\). AG
Need intermediate step between \(\frac{x}{2} = \tan^{-1}\frac{1}{3x}\) and \(\cot\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) = 3x\)
Total: 2
Question 6(c):
AnswerMarks Guidance
AnswerMark Guidance
Use the iterative process correctly at least onceM1 Obtain one value and substitute back to obtain a second value. Working in degrees is M0.
Obtain final answer \(0.79\)A1 Must be to 2 d.p.
Show sufficient iterations to at least 4 d.p. to justify \(0.79\) to 2 d.p. or show there is a sign change in the interval \((0.785, 0.795)\)A1 e.g. \(1, 0.7623, 0.8037, 0.7921, 0.7951, 0.7943, 0.7945\) or \(0.5, 0.9506, 0.7665, 0.8024, 0.7924, 0.7950, 0.7944, 0.7945\) or \(0.75, 0.8076, 0.7911, 0.7954, 0.7943, 0.7946, 0.7945\). Condone truncation. Allow recovery. Condone minor differences in final d.p.
3If they do the iteration in (b) but restate the conclusion here, no marks in (b) but could score 3/3 for (c).
## Question 6(a):

| Answer | Mark | Guidance |
|--------|------|----------|
| Calculate the values of a relevant expression or pair of expressions at $x = 0.5$ and $x = 1$ | M1 | Need to evaluate at both points, but M1 still available if one value incorrect. Use of degrees is M0. Correct use of a smaller interval is M1. If using $g(x) - f(x)$, there needs to be a clear indication of the comparison being made e.g. by listing values in a table. Embedded values 0.5 and 1 are not sufficient. 3.92 and 1.83 alone are not sufficient |
| Complete the argument correctly with conclusion about change of sign or change of inequalities and with correct calculated values. Can all be in symbols – explanation in words is not required | A1 | e.g. $3.92 > 1.5$, $1.83 < 3$ or $2.42 > 0$, $-1.17 < 0$ |
| **Total: 2** | | |

---

## Question 6(b):

| Answer | Mark | Guidance |
|--------|------|----------|
| State $x = \frac{1}{3}\left(x + 4\tan^{-1}\frac{1}{3x}\right)$ | M1 | Or rearrange $\cot\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) = 3x$ as far as $2x = 4\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{3x}\right)$ |
| Rearrange to the given equation $\cot\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) = 3x$ | A1 | Or continue rearrangement to $x = \frac{1}{3}\left(x + 4\tan^{-1}\frac{1}{3x}\right)$ and state iterative formula of $x_{n+1} = \frac{1}{3}\left(x_n + 4\tan^{-1}\frac{1}{3x_n}\right)$. **AG** |
| Need intermediate step between $\frac{x}{2} = \tan^{-1}\frac{1}{3x}$ and $\cot\left(\frac{x}{2}\right) = 3x$ | | |
| **Total: 2** | | |

## Question 6(c):

| Answer | Mark | Guidance |
|--------|------|----------|
| Use the iterative process correctly at least once | M1 | Obtain one value and substitute back to obtain a second value. Working in degrees is M0. |
| Obtain final answer $0.79$ | A1 | Must be to 2 d.p. |
| Show sufficient iterations to at least 4 d.p. to justify $0.79$ to 2 d.p. or show there is a sign change in the interval $(0.785, 0.795)$ | A1 | e.g. $1, 0.7623, 0.8037, 0.7921, 0.7951, 0.7943, 0.7945$ or $0.5, 0.9506, 0.7665, 0.8024, 0.7924, 0.7950, 0.7944, 0.7945$ or $0.75, 0.8076, 0.7911, 0.7954, 0.7943, 0.7946, 0.7945$. Condone truncation. Allow recovery. Condone minor differences in final d.p. |
| | 3 | If they do the iteration in (b) but restate the conclusion here, no marks in (b) but could score 3/3 for (c). |

---
6 The equation $\cot \frac { 1 } { 2 } x = 3 x$ has one root in the interval $0 < x < \pi$, denoted by $\alpha$.
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item Show by calculation that $\alpha$ lies between 0.5 and 1 .
\item Show that, if a sequence of positive values given by the iterative formula

$$x _ { n + 1 } = \frac { 1 } { 3 } \left( x _ { n } + 4 \tan ^ { - 1 } \left( \frac { 1 } { 3 x _ { n } } \right) \right)$$

converges, then it converges to $\alpha$.
\item Use this iterative formula to calculate $\alpha$ correct to 2 decimal places. Give the result of each iteration to 4 decimal places.
\end{enumerate}

\hfill \mbox{\textit{CAIE P3 2023 Q6 [7]}}