CAIE P2 2011 November — Question 3 6 marks

Exam BoardCAIE
ModuleP2 (Pure Mathematics 2)
Year2011
SessionNovember
Marks6
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicNumerical integration
TypeOver/underestimate justification with graph
DifficultyStandard +0.3 This is a straightforward multi-part question combining basic calculus techniques. Part (i) requires simple differentiation and solving dy/dx=0. Part (ii) is a standard trapezium rule application with clear intervals. Part (iii) tests understanding of concavity, requiring the second derivative test. All techniques are routine for P2/C3 level with no novel problem-solving required, making it slightly easier than average.
Spec1.07l Derivative of ln(x): and related functions1.07n Stationary points: find maxima, minima using derivatives1.09f Trapezium rule: numerical integration

3 \includegraphics[max width=\textwidth, alt={}, center]{322eb555-d40a-460c-8c71-5780f5772bcd-2_535_1041_573_552} The diagram shows the curve \(y = x - 2 \ln x\) and its minimum point \(M\).
  1. Find the \(x\)-coordinate of \(M\).
  2. Use the trapezium rule with three intervals to estimate the value of $$\int _ { 2 } ^ { 5 } ( x - 2 \ln x ) \mathrm { d } x$$ giving your answer correct to 2 decimal places.
  3. State, with a reason, whether the trapezium rule gives an under-estimate or an over-estimate of the true value of the integral in part (ii).

AnswerMarks Guidance
(i) Obtain correct derivativeB1
Obtain \(x = 2\) onlyB1 [2]
(ii) State or imply correct ordinates \(0.61370..., 0.80277..., 1.22741..., 1.78112...\)B1
Use correct formula, or equivalent, correctly with \(h = 1\) and four ordinatesM1
Obtain answer \(3.23\) with no errors seenA1 [3]
(iii) Justify statement that the trapezium rule gives an over-estimateB1 [1]
**(i)** Obtain correct derivative | B1 |
Obtain $x = 2$ only | B1 | [2] |

**(ii)** State or imply correct ordinates $0.61370..., 0.80277..., 1.22741..., 1.78112...$ | B1 |
Use correct formula, or equivalent, correctly with $h = 1$ and four ordinates | M1 |
Obtain answer $3.23$ with no errors seen | A1 | [3] |

**(iii)** Justify statement that the trapezium rule gives an over-estimate | B1 | [1] |
3\\
\includegraphics[max width=\textwidth, alt={}, center]{322eb555-d40a-460c-8c71-5780f5772bcd-2_535_1041_573_552}

The diagram shows the curve $y = x - 2 \ln x$ and its minimum point $M$.\\
(i) Find the $x$-coordinate of $M$.\\
(ii) Use the trapezium rule with three intervals to estimate the value of

$$\int _ { 2 } ^ { 5 } ( x - 2 \ln x ) \mathrm { d } x$$

giving your answer correct to 2 decimal places.\\
(iii) State, with a reason, whether the trapezium rule gives an under-estimate or an over-estimate of the true value of the integral in part (ii).

\hfill \mbox{\textit{CAIE P2 2011 Q3 [6]}}