Numerical integration

263 questions · 14 question types identified

Sort by: Question count | Difficulty
Complete table then apply trapezium rule

A question is this type if and only if it provides a partially completed table of x and y values, asks the student to fill in missing values, and then apply the trapezium rule to estimate an integral or area.

61 Moderate -0.4
23.2% of questions
Show example »
The following is a table of values for \(y = \sqrt{1 + \sin x}\), where \(x\) is in radians.
\(x\)00.511.52
\(y\)11.216\(p\)1.413\(q\)
  1. Find the value of \(p\) and the value of \(q\). [2]
  2. Use the trapezium rule and all the values of \(y\) in the completed table to obtain an estimate of \(I\), where $$I = \int_0^2 \sqrt{1 + \sin x} \, dx.$$ [4]
View full question →
Easiest question Easy -1.2 »
  1. The table below shows corresponding values of \(x\) and \(y\) for \(y = \frac { 1 } { \sqrt { ( x + 1 ) } }\), with the values
    for \(y\) rounded to 3 decimal places where necessary.
\(x\)03691215
\(y\)10.50.3780.3160.277
  1. Complete the table by giving the value of \(y\) corresponding to \(x = 15\)
  2. Use the trapezium rule with all the values of \(y\) from the completed table to find an approximate value for $$\int _ { 0 } ^ { 15 } \frac { 1 } { \sqrt { ( x + 1 ) } } \mathrm { d } x$$ giving your answer to 2 decimal places.
View full question →
Hardest question Standard +0.3 »
9. \(y\) \begin{figure}[h]
\includegraphics[alt={},max width=\textwidth]{6f31b6f1-33b5-4bca-9030-cf93760b454d-13_895_1308_207_294} \captionsetup{labelformat=empty} \caption{Figure 2}
\end{figure} The finite region \(R\), as shown in Figure 2, is bounded by the \(x\)-axis and the curve with equation $$y = 27 - 2 x - 9 \sqrt { } x - \frac { 16 } { x ^ { 2 } } , \quad x > 0$$ The curve crosses the \(x\)-axis at the points \(( 1,0 )\) and \(( 4,0 )\).
  1. Complete the table below, by giving your values of \(y\) to 3 decimal places.
    \(x\)11.522.533.54
    \(y\)05.8665.2101.8560
  2. Use the trapezium rule with all the values in the completed table to find an approximate value for the area of \(R\), giving your answer to 2 decimal places.
  3. Use integration to find the exact value for the area of \(R\).
View full question →
Trapezium rule with stated number of strips

A question is this type if and only if it asks the student to apply the trapezium rule to a given function with a specified number of strips or intervals, without providing a table of values.

47 Moderate -0.5
17.9% of questions
Show example »
1 Use the trapezium rule, with 3 strips each of width 2 , to estimate the value of $$\int _ { 5 } ^ { 11 } \frac { 8 } { x } \mathrm {~d} x .$$
View full question →
Easiest question Easy -1.2 »
6. (a) Sketch the graph of \(y = 1 + \cos x , \quad 0 \leqslant x \leqslant 2 \pi\) Show on your sketch the coordinates of the points where your graph meets the coordinate axes.
(b) Use the trapezium rule, with 6 strips of equal width, to find an approximate value for $$\int _ { 0 } ^ { 2 \pi } ( 1 + \cos x ) d x$$
View full question →
Hardest question Challenging +1.2 »
A particle of mass 4 kg moves horizontally in a straight line. At time \(t\) seconds the velocity of the particle is \(v\) m s\(^{-1}\) The following horizontal forces act on the particle: • a constant driving force of magnitude 1.8 newtons • another driving force of magnitude \(30\sqrt{t}\) newtons • a resistive force of magnitude \(0.08v^2\) newtons When \(t = 70\), \(v = 54\) Use Euler's method with a step length of 0.5 to estimate the velocity of the particle after 71 seconds. Give your answer to four significant figures. [6 marks]
View full question →
Trapezium rule applied to real-world data

A question is this type if and only if it applies the trapezium rule to a practical context such as river cross-sections, speed-time graphs, building cross-sections, or other physical measurements given in a table.

45 Moderate -0.1
17.1% of questions
Show example »
1
  1. Solve the following simultaneous equations. $$\begin{aligned} & x + \quad y = 1 \\ & x + 0.99 y = 2 \end{aligned}$$
  2. The coefficient 0.99 is correct to two decimal places. All other coefficients in the equations are exact. With the aid of suitable calculations, explain why your answer to part (i) is unreliable.
View full question →
Easiest question Easy -1.2 »
2 Fig. 7 shows a curve and the coordinates of some points on it. \begin{figure}[h]
\includegraphics[alt={},max width=\textwidth]{e97df57f-3b69-4bec-bc58-9730873dea53-2_639_1037_294_517} \captionsetup{labelformat=empty} \caption{Fig. 7}
\end{figure} Use the trapezium rule with 6 strips to estimate the area of the region bounded by the curve and the positive \(x\) - and \(y\)-axes.
View full question →
Hardest question Challenging +1.2 »
7 Fig. 7.1 shows two values of \(x\) and the associated values of \(\mathrm { f } ( x )\). \begin{table}[h]
\(x\)33.5
\(\mathrm { f } ( x )\)6.0827634.596194
\captionsetup{labelformat=empty} \caption{Fig. 7.1}
\end{table}
  1. Use the forward difference method to calculate an estimate of the gradient of \(\mathrm { f } ( x )\) at \(x = 3\), giving your answer correct to 4 decimal places. Fig. 7.2 shows some spreadsheet output with additional values of \(x\) and the associated values of \(\mathrm { f } ( x )\). \begin{table}[h]
    \(x\)33.000013.00013.0013.013.1
    \(\mathrm { f } ( x )\)6.0827636.082746.0825416.080546.0604545.848846
    \captionsetup{labelformat=empty} \caption{Fig. 7.2}
    \end{table} These values have been used to produce a sequence of estimates of the gradient of \(\mathrm { f } ( x )\) at \(x = 3\), together with some further analysis. This is shown in the spreadsheet output in Fig. 7.3. \begin{table}[h]
    \(h\)0.10.010.0010.00010.00001
    estimate-2.339165-2.230883-2.220532-2.219501-2.219398
    difference0.10828150.0103520.00103070.000103
    ratio0.0956020.0995670.0999568
    \captionsetup{labelformat=empty} \caption{Fig. 7.3}
    \end{table} Tommy states that the differences between successive estimates is decreasing so rapidly that the order of convergence of this sequence of estimates is much faster than first order.
  2. Explain whether or not Tommy is correct.
  3. Use extrapolation to determine the value of the gradient of \(\mathrm { f } ( x )\) at \(x = 3\) as accurately as possible, justifying the precision quoted.
  4. Calculate an estimate of the absolute error when \(\mathrm { f } ( 3 )\) is used as an approximation to \(\mathrm { f } ( 3.02 )\).
View full question →
Simpson's rule application

A question is this type if and only if it explicitly asks the student to use Simpson's rule (rather than the trapezium rule) to estimate a definite integral.

24 Moderate -0.0
9.1% of questions
Show example »
  1. Use Simpson's rule with 4 intervals to estimate
$$\int _ { 0.4 } ^ { 2 } e ^ { x ^ { 2 } } d x$$
View full question →
Easiest question Moderate -0.8 »
4 The integral I is defined by $$I = \int _ { 0 } ^ { 13 } ( 2 x + 1 ) ^ { \frac { 1 } { 3 } } d x$$
  1. Use integration to find the exact value of I .
  2. Use Simpson's rule with two strips to find an approximate value for I. Give your answer correct to 3 significant figures.
View full question →
Hardest question Challenging +1.2 »
9 The trapezium rule is used to calculate 3 approximations to \(\int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } \sqrt [ 3 ] { \sinh ( x ) } \mathrm { d } x\) with 1,2 and 4 strips respectively. The results are shown in Table 9.1. \begin{table}[h]
\captionsetup{labelformat=empty} \caption{Table 9.1}
\(n\)\(\mathrm {~T} _ { n }\)
10.52764369
20.66617652
40.72534275
\end{table}
  1. Use these results to determine two approximations to \(\int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } \sqrt [ 3 ] { \sinh ( x ) } \mathrm { d } x\) using Simpson's rule.
  2. Use your answers to part (a) to state the value of \(\int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } \sqrt [ 3 ] { \sinh ( x ) } \mathrm { d } x\) as accurately as you can, justifying the precision quoted. Table 9.2 shows some further approximations found using the trapezium rule, together with some analysis of these approximations. \begin{table}[h]
    \captionsetup{labelformat=empty} \caption{Table 9.2}
    \(n\)\(\mathrm { T } _ { n }\)differenceratio
    10.5276437
    20.66617650.138533
    40.72534270.0591660.42709
    80.74988210.0245390.41475
    160.75988580.0100040.40766
    320.76392210.0040360.40348
    640.76554040.0016180.40095
    \end{table}
  3. Explain what can be deduced about the order of the method in this case.
  4. Use extrapolation to obtain the value of \(\int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } \sqrt [ 3 ] { \sinh ( x ) } \mathrm { d } x\) as accurately as you can, justifying the precision quoted.
View full question →
Rectangle bounds for definite integral

A question is this type if and only if it asks the student to use sets of rectangles (upper and/or lower) to establish upper and lower bounds for a definite integral, typically involving a diagram of n rectangles of equal width.

19 Standard +0.6
7.2% of questions
Show example »
3 \includegraphics[max width=\textwidth, alt={}, center]{15dd10f9-73d4-4107-bb45-7866f5470572-2_643_787_1621_680} The diagram shows the curve with equation \(y = \sqrt { 1 + x ^ { 3 } }\), for \(2 \leqslant x \leqslant 3\). The region under the curve between these limits has area \(A\).
  1. Explain why \(3 < A < \sqrt { 28 }\).
  2. The region is divided into 5 strips, each of width 0.2 . By using suitable rectangles, find improved lower and upper bounds between which \(A\) lies. Give your answers correct to 3 significant figures.
View full question →
Easiest question Moderate -0.8 »
6 Alex is investigating the area, \(A\), under the graph of \(y = x ^ { 2 }\) between \(x = 1\) and \(x = 1.5\). They draw the graph, together with rectangles of width \(\delta x = 0.1\), and varying heights \(y\). \includegraphics[max width=\textwidth, alt={}, center]{7298e7b9-ad52-480c-bc2b-8289aeab9ebb-06_531_714_356_251}
  1. Use the rectangles in the diagram to show that lower and upper bounds for the area \(A\) are 0.73 and 0.855 respectively.
  2. Alex finds lower and upper bounds for the area \(A\), using widths \(\delta x\) of decreasing size. The results are shown in the table. Where relevant, values are given correct to 3 significant figures.
    Width \(\delta x\)0.10.050.0250.0125
    Lower bound for area \(A\)0.730.7610.7760.784
    Upper bound for area \(A\)0.8550.8230.8070.799
    Use Alex's results to estimate the value of \(A\) correct to \(\mathbf { 2 }\) significant figures. Give a brief justification for your estimate.
  3. Write down an expression, in terms of \(y\) and \(\delta x\), for the exact value of the area \(A\).
View full question →
Hardest question Challenging +1.8 »
6 \includegraphics[max width=\textwidth, alt={}, center]{23b06b1c-997f-425d-ae3d-bd4cc1295605-10_771_1146_260_497} The diagram shows the curve with equation \(\mathrm { y } = \ln ( 1 + \mathrm { x } )\) for \(0 \leqslant x \leqslant 1\), together with a set of \(n\) rectangles each of width \(\frac { 1 } { n }\).
  1. By considering the sum of the areas of these rectangles, show that \(\int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } \ln ( 1 + x ) d x < U _ { n }\), where $$U _ { n } = \frac { 1 } { n } \ln \frac { ( 2 n ) ! } { n ! } - \ln n$$
  2. Use a similar method to find, in terms of \(n\), a lower bound \(\mathrm { L } _ { \mathrm { n } }\) for \(\int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } \ln ( 1 + x ) \mathrm { d } x\).
  3. By simplifying \(\mathrm { U } _ { \mathrm { n } } - \mathrm { L } _ { \mathrm { n } }\), show that \(\lim _ { \mathrm { n } \rightarrow \infty } \left( \mathrm { U } _ { \mathrm { n } } - \mathrm { L } _ { \mathrm { n } } \right) = 0\).
View full question →
Over/underestimate justification with graph

A question is this type if and only if it asks the student to state and justify whether a trapezium rule estimate is an overestimate or underestimate, requiring reference to the concavity or shape of the curve.

15 Moderate -0.2
5.7% of questions
Show example »
2
  1. Use the trapezium rule with 3 intervals to estimate the value of $$\int _ { \frac { 1 } { 6 } \pi } ^ { \frac { 2 } { 3 } \pi } \operatorname { cosec } x d x$$ giving your answer correct to 2 decimal places.
  2. Using a sketch of the graph of \(y = \operatorname { cosec } x\), explain whether the trapezium rule gives an overestimate or an underestimate of the true value of the integral in part (i).
View full question →
Easiest question Moderate -0.8 »
4 \begin{figure}[h]
\includegraphics[alt={},max width=\textwidth]{15b8f97b-c058-409f-907f-cb0a6102abc4-2_615_971_1457_539} \captionsetup{labelformat=empty} \caption{Fig. 4}
\end{figure} Fig. 4 shows a curve which passes through the points shown in the following table.
\(x\)11.522.533.54
\(y\)8.26.45.55.04.74.44.2
Use the trapezium rule with 6 strips to estimate the area of the region bounded by the curve, the lines \(x = 1\) and \(x = 4\), and the \(x\)-axis. State, with a reason, whether the trapezium rule gives an overestimate or an underestimate of the area of this region.
View full question →
Hardest question Challenging +1.2 »
6 The diagram below shows part of the graph of \(y = \mathrm { f } ( x )\) The line \(T P Q\) is a tangent to the graph of \(y = \mathrm { f } ( x )\) at the point \(P \left( \frac { a + b } { 2 } , \mathrm { f } \left( \frac { a + b } { 2 } \right) \right)\) The points \(S ( a , 0 )\) and \(T\) lie on the line \(x = a\) The points \(Q\) and \(R ( b , 0 )\) lie on the line \(x = b\) \includegraphics[max width=\textwidth, alt={}, center]{74b8239a-1f46-45e7-ad20-2dce7bf4baf6-05_748_696_669_671} Sharon uses the mid-ordinate rule with one strip to estimate the value of the integral \(\int _ { a } ^ { b } \mathrm { f } ( x ) \mathrm { d } x\) By considering the area of the trapezium QRST, state, giving reasons, whether you would expect Sharon's estimate to be an under-estimate or an over-estimate.
View full question →
Apply trapezium rule to given table

A question is this type if and only if it provides a fully completed table of values and asks only for the trapezium rule to be applied directly, with no missing values to calculate.

14 Moderate -0.8
5.3% of questions
Show example »
Fig. 7 shows a curve and the coordinates of some points on it. \includegraphics{figure_7} Use the trapezium rule with 6 strips to estimate the area of the region bounded by the curve and the positive \(x\)- and \(y\)-axes. [4]
View full question →
Easiest question Easy -1.3 »
6. (a) Sketch the graph of \(y = \left( \frac { 1 } { 2 } \right) ^ { x } , x \in \mathbb { R }\), showing the coordinates of the point at which the graph crosses the \(y\)-axis. The table below gives corresponding values of \(x\) and \(y\), for \(y = \left( \frac { 1 } { 2 } \right) ^ { x }\) The values of \(y\) are rounded to 3 decimal places.
\(x\)- 0.9- 0.8- 0.7- 0.6- 0.5
\(y\)1.8661.7411.6251.5161.414
(b) Use the trapezium rule with all the values of \(y\) from the table to find an approximate value for $$\int _ { - 0.9 } ^ { - 0.5 } \left( \frac { 1 } { 2 } \right) ^ { x } d x$$ II
View full question →
Hardest question Standard +0.3 »
13. \begin{figure}[h]
\includegraphics[alt={},max width=\textwidth]{a9870c94-0910-46ec-a54a-44a431cb324e-42_649_709_242_614} \captionsetup{labelformat=empty} \caption{Figure 4}
\end{figure} Figure 4 shows a sketch of the curve with equation \(y = 12 x ^ { 2 } \ln \left( 2 x ^ { 2 } \right) , x > 0\) The finite region \(R\), shown shaded in Figure 4, is bounded by the curve, the line with equation \(x = 1\), the \(x\)-axis and the line with equation \(x = 2\) The table below shows corresponding values of \(x\) and \(y\) for \(y = 12 x ^ { 2 } \ln \left( 2 x ^ { 2 } \right)\), with the values of \(y\) given to 3 significant figures.
\(x\)11.251.51.752
\(y\)8.3221.440.666.699.8
  1. Use the trapezium rule, with all the values of \(y\), to obtain an estimate for the area of \(R\), giving your answer to 2 significant figures.
  2. Use the substitution \(u = x ^ { 2 }\) to show that the area of \(R\) is given by $$\int _ { 1 } ^ { 4 } 6 u ^ { \frac { 1 } { 2 } } \ln ( 2 u ) \mathrm { d } u$$
  3. Hence, using calculus, find the exact area of \(R\), writing your answer in the form \(a + b \ln 2\), where \(a\) and \(b\) are constants to be found.
View full question →
Compare two trapezium rule estimates

A question is this type if and only if it asks whether using more strips in the trapezium rule would give a larger or smaller estimate than a previously computed one, requiring reasoning about curve shape without further calculation.

10 Moderate -0.3
3.8% of questions
Show example »
6 The graph shows part of the curve \(y = \frac { 1 } { 1 + x ^ { 2 } }\). \includegraphics[max width=\textwidth, alt={}, center]{62dbc58e-f498-483f-a9aa-05cb5aa44881-3_474_961_406_479} Use the trapezium rule to estimate the area between the curve, the \(x\)-axis and the lines \(x = 1\) and \(x = 2\) using
  1. 2 strips,
  2. 4 strips. What can you conclude about the true value of the area?
View full question →
Easiest question Moderate -0.8 »
2 Fig. 2 shows part of the curve \(y = \sqrt { 1 + x ^ { 3 } }\). \begin{figure}[h]
\includegraphics[alt={},max width=\textwidth]{5dcd4f44-4c61-4384-be1b-a8d63cb6b5aa-2_540_648_662_712} \captionsetup{labelformat=empty} \caption{Fig. 2}
\end{figure}
  1. Use the trapezium rule with 4 strips to estimate \(\int _ { 0 } ^ { 2 } \sqrt { 1 + x ^ { 3 } } \mathrm {~d} x\), giving your answer correct to 3 significant figures.
  2. Chris and Dave each estimate the value of this integral using the trapezium rule with 8 strips. Chris gets a result of 3.25, and Dave gets 3.30. One of these results is correct. Without performing the calculation, state with a reason which is correct.
    [0pt] [2]
View full question →
Hardest question Challenging +1.2 »
7 Fig. 7 shows the graph of \(y = \mathrm { f } ( x )\) for values of \(x\) from 0 to 1 . \begin{figure}[h]
\includegraphics[alt={},max width=\textwidth]{662c2d48-228a-4b94-a4b4-cdd31634ef21-6_693_673_390_696} \captionsetup{labelformat=empty} \caption{Fig. 7}
\end{figure} The following spreadsheet printout shows estimates of \(\int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } f ( x ) d x\) found using the midpoint and trapezium rules for different values of \(h\), the strip width.
AABC
1\(h\)MidpointTrapezium
211.998517421.751283839
30.51.96385911.874900631
40.251.951352591.919379864
50.1251.946821021.935366229
  1. Without doing any further calculation, write down the smallest possible interval which contains the value of the integral. Justify your answer.
  2. (A) - Calculate the ratio of differences, \(r\), for the sequence of estimates calculated using the trapezium rule.
    Using a similar approach with the sequence of estimates calculated using the midpoint rule, the approximation to the integral from extrapolation was found to be 1.94427 correct to 5 decimal places.
  3. Andrea uses the extrapolated midpoint rule value and the value found in part (ii) ( \(B\) ) to write down an interval which contains the value of the integral. Comment on the validity of Andrea's method.
  4. Use the values from the spreadsheet output to calculate an approximation to the integral using Simpson's rule with \(h = 0.125\). Give your answer to 5 decimal places. Approximations to the integral using Simpson's rule are given in the spreadsheet output below. The number of applications of Simpson's rule is given in column N.
    NOPQ
    \(n\)Simpsondifferencesratio
    11.916106230.018100050.3584931
    21.934206280.006488740.3556525
    41.940695020.002307740.3544828
    81.943002750.000818050.3539885
    161.943820810.000289580.3537638
    321.944110390.000102440.3536568
    641.94421283\(3.623 \mathrm { E } - 05\)
    1281.94424906
  5. Use the spreadsheet output to find the value of the integral as accurately as possible. Justify the precision quoted. \section*{END OF QUESTION PAPER} }{www.ocr.org.uk}) after the live examination series. If OCR has unwittingly failed to correctly acknowledge or clear any third-party content in this assessment material, OCR will be happy to correct its mistake at the earliest possible opportunity. For queries or further information please contact the Copyright Team, First Floor, 9 Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 1GE.
    OCR is part of the }\section*{}
View full question →
Trapezium rule then exact integration comparison

A question is this type if and only if it asks for both a trapezium rule estimate and the exact value via calculus, often to find a percentage error or compare the two results.

7 Moderate -0.1
2.7% of questions
Show example »
8. The finite region \(R\) is bounded by the curve \(y = 1 + 3 \sqrt { x }\), the \(x\)-axis and the lines \(x = 2\) and \(x = 8\).
  1. Use the trapezium rule with three intervals, each of width 2 , to estimate to 3 significant figures the area of \(R\).
  2. Use integration to find the exact area of \(R\) in the form \(a + b \sqrt { 2 }\).
  3. Find the percentage error in the estimate made in part (a).
View full question →
Trapezium rule accuracy improvement explanation

A question is this type if and only if it asks the student to explain how the trapezium rule could be used to obtain a more accurate estimate, without requiring any further numerical calculation.

7 Moderate -0.5
2.7% of questions
Show example »
2
  1. Use the trapezium rule, with 4 strips each of width 1.5, to estimate the value of $$\int _ { 4 } ^ { 10 } \sqrt { 2 x - 1 } \mathrm {~d} x ,$$ giving your answer correct to 3 significant figures.
  2. Explain how the trapezium rule could be used to obtain a more accurate estimate.
View full question →
Rectangle bounds for infinite series

A question is this type if and only if it asks the student to use rectangle areas under a curve to establish upper or lower bounds for an infinite or finite sum of the form sum(f(r)).

5 Challenging +1.3
1.9% of questions
Show example »
\includegraphics{figure_4} The diagram shows the curve with equation \(y = \ln x\) for \(x \geqslant 1\), together with a set of \((N-1)\) rectangles of unit width.
  1. By considering the sum of the areas of these rectangles, show that $$\ln N! > N \ln N - N + 1.$$ [5]
  2. Use a similar method to find, in terms of \(N\), an upper bound for \(\ln N!\). [3]
View full question →
Show trapezium rule gives specific value

A question is this type if and only if it asks the student to show that applying the trapezium rule produces a particular given expression or numerical value, rather than simply finding an approximation.

5 Moderate -0.5
1.9% of questions
Show example »
4
  1. Use the trapezium rule with three intervals to show that the value of \(\int _ { 1 } ^ { 4 } \ln x \mathrm {~d} x\) is approximately \(\ln 12\).
  2. Use a graph of \(y = \ln x\) to show that \(\ln 12\) is an under-estimate of the true value of \(\int _ { 1 } ^ { 4 } \ln x \mathrm {~d} x\).
View full question →
Limit of rectangle sum equals integral

A question is this type if and only if it asks the student to show that the limit as n tends to infinity of a rectangle sum equals a definite integral, or to use this connection to evaluate a limit or series.

2 Standard +0.8
0.8% of questions
Show example »
4.(a)Use the trapezium rule with 4 strips to find an approximate value for $$\int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } 16 ^ { x } d x$$ (b)Use the trapezium rule with \(n\) strips to write down an expression that would give an approximate value for $$\int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } 16 ^ { x } d x$$ (c)Hence show that $$\int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } 16 ^ { x } \mathrm {~d} x = \lim _ { n \rightarrow \infty } \left( \frac { 1 } { n } \left( 1 + 16 ^ { \frac { 1 } { n } } + \ldots + 16 ^ { \frac { n - 1 } { n } } \right) \right)$$ (d)Use integration to determine the exact value of $$\int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } 16 ^ { x } d x$$ Given that the limit exists,
(e)use part(c)and the answer to part(d)to determine the exact value of $$\lim _ { x \rightarrow 0 } \frac { 16 ^ { x } - 1 } { x }$$
View full question →
Trapezium rule symmetry argument

A question is this type if and only if it involves a function that is symmetric or nearly symmetric over the interval of integration, and asks the student to explain why the trapezium rule gives a good approximation based on this symmetry.

2 Moderate -0.6
0.8% of questions
Show example »
2 \includegraphics[max width=\textwidth, alt={}, center]{208eab3e-a78c-43b4-918f-a9efc9b4f47a-2_508_586_450_776} The diagram shows a sketch of the curve \(y = \frac { 1 } { 1 + x ^ { 3 } }\) for values of \(x\) from - 0.6 to 0.6 .
  1. Use the trapezium rule, with two intervals, to estimate the value of $$\int _ { - 0.6 } ^ { 0.6 } \frac { 1 } { 1 + x ^ { 3 } } \mathrm {~d} x$$ giving your answer correct to 2 decimal places.
  2. Explain, with reference to the diagram, why the trapezium rule may be expected to give a good approximation to the true value of the integral in this case.
View full question →