Edexcel S2 2020 October — Question 3 15 marks

Exam BoardEdexcel
ModuleS2 (Statistics 2)
Year2020
SessionOctober
Marks15
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicApproximating Binomial to Normal Distribution
TypeSmall sample binomial probability
DifficultyModerate -0.3 This is a straightforward S2 question testing standard binomial calculations and normal approximation. Part (a) requires basic binomial probability calculations with n=10; part (b) is a routine normal approximation with continuity correction to find critical values; part (c) is a standard one-tailed hypothesis test. All parts follow textbook procedures with no novel insight required, making it slightly easier than average for A-level.
Spec2.04b Binomial distribution: as model B(n,p)2.04c Calculate binomial probabilities2.04d Normal approximation to binomial2.05b Hypothesis test for binomial proportion2.05c Significance levels: one-tail and two-tail

3. A manufacturer produces plates. The proportion of plates that are flawed is \(45 \%\), with flawed plates occurring independently. A random sample of 10 of these plates is selected.
  1. Find the probability that the sample contains
    1. fewer than 2 flawed plates,
    2. at least 6 flawed plates.
      (4) George believes that the proportion of flawed plates is not \(45 \%\). To assess his belief George takes a random sample of 120 plates. The random variable \(F\) represents the number of flawed plates found in the sample.
  2. Using a normal approximation, find the maximum number of plates, \(c\), and the minimum number of plates, \(d\), such that $$\mathrm { P } ( F \leqslant c ) \leqslant 0.05 \text { and } \mathrm { P } ( F \geqslant d ) \leqslant 0.05$$ where \(F \sim \mathrm {~B} ( 120,0.45 )\) The manufacturer claims that, after a change to the production process, the proportion of flawed plates has decreased. A random sample of 30 plates, taken after the change to the production process, contains 8 flawed plates.
  3. Use a suitable hypothesis test, at the \(5 \%\) level of significance, to assess the manufacturer's claim. State your hypotheses clearly. \includegraphics[max width=\textwidth, alt={}, center]{3a781851-e2cc-4379-8b8c-abb3060a6019-11_2255_50_314_34}

Question 3:
Part (a)(i):
AnswerMarks Guidance
Answer/WorkingMark Guidance
\(X \sim B(10, 0.45)\)M1 Writing or using \(B(10, 0.45)\) in (i) or (ii) implied by correct answer
\(P(X \leq 1) = 0.0233\)A1 awrt 0.0233
Part (a)(ii):
AnswerMarks Guidance
Answer/WorkingMark Guidance
\(P(X \geq 6) = 1 - P(X \leq 5)\) or \(1 - 0.7384\)M1 For writing or using \(1 - P(X \leq 5)\) oe
\(= 0.2616...\)A1 awrt 0.262
Part (b):
AnswerMarks Guidance
Answer/WorkingMark Guidance
\(F \sim N(54, 29.7)\)M1A1 M1 for \(N(54,...)\), A1 for \(N(54, 29.7)\)
\(\frac{c + 0.5 - 54}{\sqrt{29.7}} \leq -1.6449\) or \(\frac{d - 0.5 - 54}{\sqrt{29.7}} \geq 1.6449\)M1M1B1 M1 standardising (allow \(\pm\)) using "54" and "29.7", \(1 <
\(c = 44\) and \(d = 64\)A1cso One correct inequality A1; both \(c\) and \(d\) correct integers A1cso
Part (c):
AnswerMarks Guidance
Answer/WorkingMark Guidance
\(H_0: p = 0.45\), \(H_1: p < 0.45\)B1 Both hypotheses correct in terms of \(p\) or \(\pi\), must be attached to \(H_0\) and \(H_1\)
\(Y \sim B(30, 0.45)\), \(P(Y \leq 8) = 0.03...\) or CR \(Y \leq 8\)B1 0.03 or better (0.03120...) or CR stated as \(Y \leq 8\)
8 is in the critical region or Reject \(H_0\)dM1 Dep on 2nd B1; correct statement, allow opposite conclusion if 2-tail hypotheses given
Therefore the data supports the manufacturer's claimA1 Correct conclusion for their \(H_1\); allow proportion/percentage/probability/number/amount of flawed plates has decreased/reduced/is not 0.45/has changed oe
# Question 3:

## Part (a)(i):
| Answer/Working | Mark | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| $X \sim B(10, 0.45)$ | M1 | Writing or using $B(10, 0.45)$ in (i) or (ii) implied by correct answer |
| $P(X \leq 1) = 0.0233$ | A1 | awrt 0.0233 |

## Part (a)(ii):
| Answer/Working | Mark | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| $P(X \geq 6) = 1 - P(X \leq 5)$ or $1 - 0.7384$ | M1 | For writing or using $1 - P(X \leq 5)$ oe |
| $= 0.2616...$ | A1 | awrt 0.262 |

## Part (b):
| Answer/Working | Mark | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| $F \sim N(54, 29.7)$ | M1A1 | M1 for $N(54,...)$, A1 for $N(54, 29.7)$ |
| $\frac{c + 0.5 - 54}{\sqrt{29.7}} \leq -1.6449$ **or** $\frac{d - 0.5 - 54}{\sqrt{29.7}} \geq 1.6449$ | M1M1B1 | M1 standardising (allow $\pm$) using "54" and "29.7", $1 < |z| < 2$, condone missing $\pm 0.5$; M1 for continuity correction $\pm 0.5$; B1 for 1.6449 or better |
| $c = 44$ and $d = 64$ | A1cso | One correct inequality A1; both $c$ and $d$ correct integers A1cso |

## Part (c):
| Answer/Working | Mark | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| $H_0: p = 0.45$, $H_1: p < 0.45$ | B1 | Both hypotheses correct in terms of $p$ or $\pi$, must be attached to $H_0$ and $H_1$ |
| $Y \sim B(30, 0.45)$, $P(Y \leq 8) = 0.03...$ or CR $Y \leq 8$ | B1 | 0.03 or better (0.03120...) or CR stated as $Y \leq 8$ |
| 8 is in the critical region or Reject $H_0$ | dM1 | Dep on 2nd B1; correct statement, allow opposite conclusion if 2-tail hypotheses given |
| Therefore the data supports the **manufacturer's claim** | A1 | Correct conclusion for their $H_1$; allow **proportion/percentage/probability/number/amount** of flawed **plates** has **decreased/reduced/is not 0.45/has changed** oe |

---
3. A manufacturer produces plates. The proportion of plates that are flawed is $45 \%$, with flawed plates occurring independently.

A random sample of 10 of these plates is selected.
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item Find the probability that the sample contains
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\roman*)]
\item fewer than 2 flawed plates,
\item at least 6 flawed plates.\\
(4)

George believes that the proportion of flawed plates is not $45 \%$. To assess his belief George takes a random sample of 120 plates. The random variable $F$ represents the number of flawed plates found in the sample.
\end{enumerate}\item Using a normal approximation, find the maximum number of plates, $c$, and the minimum number of plates, $d$, such that

$$\mathrm { P } ( F \leqslant c ) \leqslant 0.05 \text { and } \mathrm { P } ( F \geqslant d ) \leqslant 0.05$$

where $F \sim \mathrm {~B} ( 120,0.45 )$

The manufacturer claims that, after a change to the production process, the proportion of flawed plates has decreased. A random sample of 30 plates, taken after the change to the production process, contains 8 flawed plates.
\item Use a suitable hypothesis test, at the $5 \%$ level of significance, to assess the manufacturer's claim. State your hypotheses clearly.

\includegraphics[max width=\textwidth, alt={}, center]{3a781851-e2cc-4379-8b8c-abb3060a6019-11_2255_50_314_34}
\end{enumerate}

\hfill \mbox{\textit{Edexcel S2 2020 Q3 [15]}}