OCR Further Mechanics AS 2023 June — Question 6 10 marks

Exam BoardOCR
ModuleFurther Mechanics AS (Further Mechanics AS)
Year2023
SessionJune
Marks10
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicDimensional Analysis
TypeVerify dimensional consistency
DifficultyModerate -0.8 This is a systematic dimensional analysis question with clear scaffolding through parts (a)-(d). While it requires understanding of dimensions [M], [L], [T] and setting up simultaneous equations, the method is entirely procedural with no novel insight required. Part (d)(iii) adds mild physical reasoning but overall this is easier than average A-level work—more routine than the standard calculus/algebra questions that define the 0.0 baseline.
Spec6.01a Dimensions: M, L, T notation6.01b Units vs dimensions: relationship6.01c Dimensional analysis: error checking

6 The physical quantity pressure, denoted by \(P\), can be calculated using the formula \(P = \frac { F } { A }\) where \(F\) is a force and \(A\) is an area.
  1. Find the dimensions of \(P\). An object of mass \(m\) is moving on a smooth horizontal surface subject to a system of forces which begin to act at time \(t = 0\). The initial velocity of the object is \(u\) and its velocity and acceleration at time \(t\) are denoted by \(v\) and \(a\) respectively. The object exerts a pressure \(P\) on the surface. The total work done by the forces is denoted by \(W\). A Mathematics class suggests three formulae to model the quantity \(W\).
    The first suggested formula is \(W = \frac { 1 } { 2 } m v ^ { 2 } - \frac { 1 } { 2 } m u ^ { 2 } + m P\).
  2. Use dimensional analysis to show that this formula cannot be correct. The second suggested formula is \(W = k u ^ { \alpha } v ^ { \beta } t ^ { \gamma }\) where \(k\) is a dimensionless constant.
  3. Use dimensional analysis to show that this formula cannot be correct for any values of \(\alpha , \beta\) and \(\gamma\). The third suggested formula is \(W = k u ^ { \alpha } a ^ { \beta } m ^ { \gamma } t ^ { \delta }\) where \(k\) is a dimensionless constant.
    1. Explain why it is not possible to use dimensional analysis to determine the values of \(\alpha\), \(\beta , \gamma\) and \(\delta\) for the third suggested formula.
    2. Given that \(\alpha = 3\), use dimensional analysis to determine the values of \(\beta , \gamma\) and \(\delta\) for the third suggested formula.
    3. By considering what the formula predicts for large values of \(t\), explain why the formula derived in part (d)(ii) is likely to be incorrect.

Question 6:
Part (a):
AnswerMarks Guidance
AnswerMarks Guidance
\([P] = MLT^{-2}/L^2 = ML^{-1}T^{-2}\)B1 Penalise wrong dimensional symbols only once as accuracy mark. Penalise \(+\) instead of \(\times\) when combining dimensions only once as accuracy mark
Part (b):
AnswerMarks Guidance
AnswerMarks Guidance
\([\frac{1}{2}mu^2]\) or \([\frac{1}{2}mv^2]\) or \([W] = ML^2T^{-2}\)M1 \(\frac{1}{2}\) not necessary
\([mP] = M^2L^{-1}T^{-2}\) so the equation is dimensionally inconsistentA1 Correct dimensions for \(mP\) and conclusion
Part (c):
AnswerMarks Guidance
AnswerMarks Guidance
\([\text{RHS}] = [M^0 L^{\alpha+\beta} T^{-(\alpha+\beta)}]^\gamma\)M1 e.g. RHS has no M
while LHS has \(M^1\) so the equation must be dimensionally inconsistentA1ft or "some M" oe. Or "no M" compared to LHS. Ignore one minor slip in L or T. And \([W] = ML^2T^{-2}\) so comparing indices leads to a contradiction. Allow incorrect expression for \([W]\) from part (b), provided it includes an element of M
Part (d)(i):
AnswerMarks Guidance
AnswerMarks Guidance
Because there are 4 unknowns and DA can only give us a maximum of 3 equationsB1 Must be specific comparison. Or 3 equations in 4 unknowns seen (condone one slip), with appropriate comment about the equations in L and T at least. Must show all 3 equations, not just the two that involve \(\alpha, \beta\) and \(\delta\)
Part (d)(ii):
AnswerMarks Guidance
AnswerMarks Guidance
\(ML^2T^{-2} = L^3T^{-3}L^\beta T^{-2\beta}M^\gamma T^\delta\)B1ft Correct dimensional expansion of both sides with \(\alpha = 3\) substituted. \(M^\gamma L^{3+\beta}T^{\delta-3-2\beta}\). Award if seen in part (i) (with \(\alpha = 3\))
M: \(1 = \gamma\), L: \(2 = 3 + \beta\), T: \(-2 = \delta - 3 - 2\beta\)M1 Correctly comparing indices for all three dimensions. Allow 1 slip. M0 if M does not appear on both sides of the dimensional equation
\(\beta = -1,\ \gamma = 1,\ \delta = -1\)A1
Part (d)(iii):
AnswerMarks Guidance
AnswerMarks Guidance
The resultant formula is \(W = \frac{ku^3m}{at}\). This is unlikely to be correct since it suggests, for example, that the total work done becomes (very) small or negligibleB1 Correct conclusion from their \(\delta \leq 0\). Condone "not correct/incorrect". Answers referring to \(t = 0\) are not valid for this question. Condone statements such as "…because work done decreases as time increases" oe, (which contradicts the expectation of a positive relationship between W and t)
# Question 6:

## Part (a):
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|--------|-------|----------|
| $[P] = MLT^{-2}/L^2 = ML^{-1}T^{-2}$ | B1 | Penalise wrong dimensional symbols only once as accuracy mark. Penalise $+$ instead of $\times$ when combining dimensions only once as accuracy mark |

## Part (b):
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|--------|-------|----------|
| $[\frac{1}{2}mu^2]$ or $[\frac{1}{2}mv^2]$ or $[W] = ML^2T^{-2}$ | M1 | $\frac{1}{2}$ not necessary |
| $[mP] = M^2L^{-1}T^{-2}$ so the equation is dimensionally inconsistent | A1 | Correct dimensions for $mP$ and conclusion |

## Part (c):
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|--------|-------|----------|
| $[\text{RHS}] = [M^0 L^{\alpha+\beta} T^{-(\alpha+\beta)}]^\gamma$ | M1 | e.g. RHS has no M |
| while LHS has $M^1$ so the equation must be dimensionally inconsistent | A1ft | or "some M" oe. Or "no M" compared to LHS. Ignore one minor slip in L or T. And $[W] = ML^2T^{-2}$ so comparing indices leads to a contradiction. Allow incorrect expression for $[W]$ from part (b), provided it includes an element of M |

## Part (d)(i):
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|--------|-------|----------|
| Because there are 4 unknowns and DA can only give us a maximum of 3 equations | B1 | Must be specific comparison. Or 3 equations in 4 unknowns seen (condone one slip), with appropriate comment about the equations in L and T at least. Must show all 3 equations, not just the two that involve $\alpha, \beta$ and $\delta$ |

## Part (d)(ii):
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|--------|-------|----------|
| $ML^2T^{-2} = L^3T^{-3}L^\beta T^{-2\beta}M^\gamma T^\delta$ | B1ft | Correct dimensional expansion of both sides with $\alpha = 3$ substituted. $M^\gamma L^{3+\beta}T^{\delta-3-2\beta}$. Award if seen in part (i) (with $\alpha = 3$) |
| M: $1 = \gamma$, L: $2 = 3 + \beta$, T: $-2 = \delta - 3 - 2\beta$ | M1 | Correctly comparing indices for all three dimensions. Allow 1 slip. M0 if M does not appear on both sides of the dimensional equation |
| $\beta = -1,\ \gamma = 1,\ \delta = -1$ | A1 | |

## Part (d)(iii):
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|--------|-------|----------|
| The resultant formula is $W = \frac{ku^3m}{at}$. This is unlikely to be correct since it suggests, for example, that the total work done becomes (very) small or negligible | B1 | Correct conclusion from their $\delta \leq 0$. Condone "not correct/incorrect". Answers referring to $t = 0$ are not valid for this question. Condone statements such as "…because work done decreases as time increases" oe, (which contradicts the expectation of a positive relationship between W and t) |

---
6 The physical quantity pressure, denoted by $P$, can be calculated using the formula $P = \frac { F } { A }$ where $F$ is a force and $A$ is an area.
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item Find the dimensions of $P$.

An object of mass $m$ is moving on a smooth horizontal surface subject to a system of forces which begin to act at time $t = 0$. The initial velocity of the object is $u$ and its velocity and acceleration at time $t$ are denoted by $v$ and $a$ respectively. The object exerts a pressure $P$ on the surface. The total work done by the forces is denoted by $W$.

A Mathematics class suggests three formulae to model the quantity $W$.\\
The first suggested formula is $W = \frac { 1 } { 2 } m v ^ { 2 } - \frac { 1 } { 2 } m u ^ { 2 } + m P$.
\item Use dimensional analysis to show that this formula cannot be correct.

The second suggested formula is $W = k u ^ { \alpha } v ^ { \beta } t ^ { \gamma }$ where $k$ is a dimensionless constant.
\item Use dimensional analysis to show that this formula cannot be correct for any values of $\alpha , \beta$ and $\gamma$.

The third suggested formula is $W = k u ^ { \alpha } a ^ { \beta } m ^ { \gamma } t ^ { \delta }$ where $k$ is a dimensionless constant.
\item \begin{enumerate}[label=(\roman*)]
\item Explain why it is not possible to use dimensional analysis to determine the values of $\alpha$, $\beta , \gamma$ and $\delta$ for the third suggested formula.
\item Given that $\alpha = 3$, use dimensional analysis to determine the values of $\beta , \gamma$ and $\delta$ for the third suggested formula.
\item By considering what the formula predicts for large values of $t$, explain why the formula derived in part (d)(ii) is likely to be incorrect.
\end{enumerate}\end{enumerate}

\hfill \mbox{\textit{OCR Further Mechanics AS 2023 Q6 [10]}}