| Exam Board | OCR |
|---|---|
| Module | Further Mechanics AS (Further Mechanics AS) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Session | June |
| Marks | 10 |
| Paper | Download PDF ↗ |
| Mark scheme | Download PDF ↗ |
| Topic | Dimensional Analysis |
| Type | Verify dimensional consistency |
| Difficulty | Moderate -0.8 This is a systematic dimensional analysis question with clear scaffolding through parts (a)-(d). While it requires understanding of dimensions [M], [L], [T] and setting up simultaneous equations, the method is entirely procedural with no novel insight required. Part (d)(iii) adds mild physical reasoning but overall this is easier than average A-level work—more routine than the standard calculus/algebra questions that define the 0.0 baseline. |
| Spec | 6.01a Dimensions: M, L, T notation6.01b Units vs dimensions: relationship6.01c Dimensional analysis: error checking |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
| \([P] = MLT^{-2}/L^2 = ML^{-1}T^{-2}\) | B1 | Penalise wrong dimensional symbols only once as accuracy mark. Penalise \(+\) instead of \(\times\) when combining dimensions only once as accuracy mark |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
| \([\frac{1}{2}mu^2]\) or \([\frac{1}{2}mv^2]\) or \([W] = ML^2T^{-2}\) | M1 | \(\frac{1}{2}\) not necessary |
| \([mP] = M^2L^{-1}T^{-2}\) so the equation is dimensionally inconsistent | A1 | Correct dimensions for \(mP\) and conclusion |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
| \([\text{RHS}] = [M^0 L^{\alpha+\beta} T^{-(\alpha+\beta)}]^\gamma\) | M1 | e.g. RHS has no M |
| while LHS has \(M^1\) so the equation must be dimensionally inconsistent | A1ft | or "some M" oe. Or "no M" compared to LHS. Ignore one minor slip in L or T. And \([W] = ML^2T^{-2}\) so comparing indices leads to a contradiction. Allow incorrect expression for \([W]\) from part (b), provided it includes an element of M |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
| Because there are 4 unknowns and DA can only give us a maximum of 3 equations | B1 | Must be specific comparison. Or 3 equations in 4 unknowns seen (condone one slip), with appropriate comment about the equations in L and T at least. Must show all 3 equations, not just the two that involve \(\alpha, \beta\) and \(\delta\) |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
| \(ML^2T^{-2} = L^3T^{-3}L^\beta T^{-2\beta}M^\gamma T^\delta\) | B1ft | Correct dimensional expansion of both sides with \(\alpha = 3\) substituted. \(M^\gamma L^{3+\beta}T^{\delta-3-2\beta}\). Award if seen in part (i) (with \(\alpha = 3\)) |
| M: \(1 = \gamma\), L: \(2 = 3 + \beta\), T: \(-2 = \delta - 3 - 2\beta\) | M1 | Correctly comparing indices for all three dimensions. Allow 1 slip. M0 if M does not appear on both sides of the dimensional equation |
| \(\beta = -1,\ \gamma = 1,\ \delta = -1\) | A1 |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
| The resultant formula is \(W = \frac{ku^3m}{at}\). This is unlikely to be correct since it suggests, for example, that the total work done becomes (very) small or negligible | B1 | Correct conclusion from their \(\delta \leq 0\). Condone "not correct/incorrect". Answers referring to \(t = 0\) are not valid for this question. Condone statements such as "…because work done decreases as time increases" oe, (which contradicts the expectation of a positive relationship between W and t) |
# Question 6:
## Part (a):
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|--------|-------|----------|
| $[P] = MLT^{-2}/L^2 = ML^{-1}T^{-2}$ | B1 | Penalise wrong dimensional symbols only once as accuracy mark. Penalise $+$ instead of $\times$ when combining dimensions only once as accuracy mark |
## Part (b):
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|--------|-------|----------|
| $[\frac{1}{2}mu^2]$ or $[\frac{1}{2}mv^2]$ or $[W] = ML^2T^{-2}$ | M1 | $\frac{1}{2}$ not necessary |
| $[mP] = M^2L^{-1}T^{-2}$ so the equation is dimensionally inconsistent | A1 | Correct dimensions for $mP$ and conclusion |
## Part (c):
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|--------|-------|----------|
| $[\text{RHS}] = [M^0 L^{\alpha+\beta} T^{-(\alpha+\beta)}]^\gamma$ | M1 | e.g. RHS has no M |
| while LHS has $M^1$ so the equation must be dimensionally inconsistent | A1ft | or "some M" oe. Or "no M" compared to LHS. Ignore one minor slip in L or T. And $[W] = ML^2T^{-2}$ so comparing indices leads to a contradiction. Allow incorrect expression for $[W]$ from part (b), provided it includes an element of M |
## Part (d)(i):
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|--------|-------|----------|
| Because there are 4 unknowns and DA can only give us a maximum of 3 equations | B1 | Must be specific comparison. Or 3 equations in 4 unknowns seen (condone one slip), with appropriate comment about the equations in L and T at least. Must show all 3 equations, not just the two that involve $\alpha, \beta$ and $\delta$ |
## Part (d)(ii):
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|--------|-------|----------|
| $ML^2T^{-2} = L^3T^{-3}L^\beta T^{-2\beta}M^\gamma T^\delta$ | B1ft | Correct dimensional expansion of both sides with $\alpha = 3$ substituted. $M^\gamma L^{3+\beta}T^{\delta-3-2\beta}$. Award if seen in part (i) (with $\alpha = 3$) |
| M: $1 = \gamma$, L: $2 = 3 + \beta$, T: $-2 = \delta - 3 - 2\beta$ | M1 | Correctly comparing indices for all three dimensions. Allow 1 slip. M0 if M does not appear on both sides of the dimensional equation |
| $\beta = -1,\ \gamma = 1,\ \delta = -1$ | A1 | |
## Part (d)(iii):
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|--------|-------|----------|
| The resultant formula is $W = \frac{ku^3m}{at}$. This is unlikely to be correct since it suggests, for example, that the total work done becomes (very) small or negligible | B1 | Correct conclusion from their $\delta \leq 0$. Condone "not correct/incorrect". Answers referring to $t = 0$ are not valid for this question. Condone statements such as "…because work done decreases as time increases" oe, (which contradicts the expectation of a positive relationship between W and t) |
---
6 The physical quantity pressure, denoted by $P$, can be calculated using the formula $P = \frac { F } { A }$ where $F$ is a force and $A$ is an area.
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item Find the dimensions of $P$.
An object of mass $m$ is moving on a smooth horizontal surface subject to a system of forces which begin to act at time $t = 0$. The initial velocity of the object is $u$ and its velocity and acceleration at time $t$ are denoted by $v$ and $a$ respectively. The object exerts a pressure $P$ on the surface. The total work done by the forces is denoted by $W$.
A Mathematics class suggests three formulae to model the quantity $W$.\\
The first suggested formula is $W = \frac { 1 } { 2 } m v ^ { 2 } - \frac { 1 } { 2 } m u ^ { 2 } + m P$.
\item Use dimensional analysis to show that this formula cannot be correct.
The second suggested formula is $W = k u ^ { \alpha } v ^ { \beta } t ^ { \gamma }$ where $k$ is a dimensionless constant.
\item Use dimensional analysis to show that this formula cannot be correct for any values of $\alpha , \beta$ and $\gamma$.
The third suggested formula is $W = k u ^ { \alpha } a ^ { \beta } m ^ { \gamma } t ^ { \delta }$ where $k$ is a dimensionless constant.
\item \begin{enumerate}[label=(\roman*)]
\item Explain why it is not possible to use dimensional analysis to determine the values of $\alpha$, $\beta , \gamma$ and $\delta$ for the third suggested formula.
\item Given that $\alpha = 3$, use dimensional analysis to determine the values of $\beta , \gamma$ and $\delta$ for the third suggested formula.
\item By considering what the formula predicts for large values of $t$, explain why the formula derived in part (d)(ii) is likely to be incorrect.
\end{enumerate}\end{enumerate}
\hfill \mbox{\textit{OCR Further Mechanics AS 2023 Q6 [10]}}