OCR C2 2012 January — Question 2 5 marks

Exam BoardOCR
ModuleC2 (Core Mathematics 2)
Year2012
SessionJanuary
Marks5
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicNumerical integration
TypeOver/underestimate justification with graph
DifficultyModerate -0.3 This is a straightforward application of the trapezium rule with clearly specified parameters (4 strips, width 1.5), requiring only substitution into the standard formula. Part (ii) tests understanding of concavity but is a standard conceptual question. Slightly easier than average due to the routine nature and clear structure, though the logarithm function and reasoning component prevent it from being trivial.
Spec1.09f Trapezium rule: numerical integration

2 \includegraphics[max width=\textwidth, alt={}, center]{ad3083ae-caa6-42d8-a1f2-e984150cb104-2_536_917_1016_577} The diagram shows the curve \(y = \log _ { 10 } ( 2 x + 1 )\).
  1. Use the trapezium rule with 4 strips each of width 1.5 to find an approximation to the area of the region bounded by the curve, the \(x\)-axis and the lines \(x = 4\) and \(x = 10\). Give your answer correct to 3 significant figures.
  2. Explain why this approximation is an under-estimate.

Question 2:
Part (i)
AnswerMarks Guidance
AnswerMarks Guidance
State, or use, \(y\)-values of \(\lg 9\), \(\lg 12\), \(\lg 15\), \(\lg 18\) and \(\lg 21\)B1 B0 if other \(y\)-values also found (unless not used in trap rule). Allow decimal equivs (0.95, 1.08, 1.18, 1.26, 1.32 or better)
Attempt correct trapezium rule, any \(h\), to find area between \(x=4\) and \(x=10\)M1 Correct structure required, including correct placing of \(y\)-values. The 'big brackets' must be seen, or implied by later working. Could be implied by stating general rule in terms of \(y_0\) etc. Could use other than 4 strips as long as of equal width. Using \(x\)-values is M0. Can give M1 even if error in \(y\)-values eg using 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 or using incorrect function eg \(\log(2x)+1\). Allow BoD if first or last \(y\)-value incorrect, unless clearly from an incorrect \(x\)-value
Use correct \(h\) in recognisable attempt at trap ruleM1 Must be in attempt at trap rule, not Simpson's rule. Allow if muddle over placing \(y\)-values (but M0 for \(x\)-values). Allow if \(\frac{1}{2}\) missing. Allow other than 4 strips as long as \(h\) is consistent. Allow slips which result in \(x\)-values not equally spaced
\(0.5 \times 1.5 \times \{\lg 9 + 2(\lg 12 + \lg 15 + \lg 18) + \lg 21\} = 6.97\); Obtain 6.97, or betterA1 Allow answers in range [6.970, 6.975] if \(>3\)sf. Answer only is 0/4. Using trap rule on result of integration attempt is 0/4. Using 4 separate trapezia can get full marks — if other than 4 trapezia then mark as above. However, using only one trapezium is 0/4
[4]
Part (ii)
AnswerMarks Guidance
AnswerMarks Guidance
tops of trapezia are below curveB1 B0 for 'the trapezium is below the curve' (ie 'top' not used). Sketch with explanation is fine, even if just arrow and 'gap'. Sketching rectangles/triangles is B0, as is a trapezium that doesn't have both top vertices intended to be on curve. Concave/convex is B0, as is comparing to exact area. B1 for reference to decreasing gradient
[1]
## Question 2:

### Part (i)
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|--------|-------|----------|
| State, or use, $y$-values of $\lg 9$, $\lg 12$, $\lg 15$, $\lg 18$ and $\lg 21$ | B1 | B0 if other $y$-values also found (unless not used in trap rule). Allow decimal equivs (0.95, 1.08, 1.18, 1.26, 1.32 or better) |
| Attempt correct trapezium rule, any $h$, to find area between $x=4$ and $x=10$ | M1 | Correct structure required, including correct placing of $y$-values. The 'big brackets' must be seen, or implied by later working. Could be implied by stating general rule in terms of $y_0$ etc. Could use other than 4 strips as long as of equal width. Using $x$-values is M0. Can give M1 even if error in $y$-values eg using 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 or using incorrect function eg $\log(2x)+1$. Allow BoD if first or last $y$-value incorrect, unless clearly from an incorrect $x$-value |
| Use correct $h$ in recognisable attempt at trap rule | M1 | Must be in attempt at trap rule, not Simpson's rule. Allow if muddle over placing $y$-values (but M0 for $x$-values). Allow if $\frac{1}{2}$ missing. Allow other than 4 strips as long as $h$ is consistent. Allow slips which result in $x$-values not equally spaced |
| $0.5 \times 1.5 \times \{\lg 9 + 2(\lg 12 + \lg 15 + \lg 18) + \lg 21\} = 6.97$; Obtain 6.97, or better | A1 | Allow answers in range [6.970, 6.975] if $>3$sf. Answer only is 0/4. Using trap rule on result of integration attempt is 0/4. Using 4 separate trapezia can get full marks — if other than 4 trapezia then mark as above. However, using only one trapezium is 0/4 |
| **[4]** | | |

### Part (ii)
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|--------|-------|----------|
| tops of trapezia are below curve | B1 | B0 for 'the trapezium is below the curve' (ie 'top' not used). Sketch with explanation is fine, even if just arrow and 'gap'. Sketching rectangles/triangles is B0, as is a trapezium that doesn't have both top vertices intended to be on curve. Concave/convex is B0, as is comparing to exact area. B1 for reference to decreasing gradient |
| **[1]** | | |

---
2\\
\includegraphics[max width=\textwidth, alt={}, center]{ad3083ae-caa6-42d8-a1f2-e984150cb104-2_536_917_1016_577}

The diagram shows the curve $y = \log _ { 10 } ( 2 x + 1 )$.\\
(i) Use the trapezium rule with 4 strips each of width 1.5 to find an approximation to the area of the region bounded by the curve, the $x$-axis and the lines $x = 4$ and $x = 10$. Give your answer correct to 3 significant figures.\\
(ii) Explain why this approximation is an under-estimate.

\hfill \mbox{\textit{OCR C2 2012 Q2 [5]}}