Edexcel D2 (Decision Mathematics 2) 2009 June

Question 1
View details
  1. A company, Kleenitquick, has developed a new stain remover. To promote sales, three salespersons, Jess, Matt and Rachel, will be assigned to three of four department stores \(1,2,3\) and 4 , to demonstrate the stain remover. Each salesperson can only be assigned to one department store.
The table below shows the cost, in pounds, of assigning each salesperson to each department store.
\(\mathbf { 1 }\)\(\mathbf { 2 }\)\(\mathbf { 3 }\)\(\mathbf { 4 }\)
Jess15111412
Matt1381713
Rachel1491315
  1. Explain why a dummy row needs to be added to the table.
  2. Complete Table 1 in the answer book.
  3. Reducing rows first, use the Hungarian algorithm to obtain an allocation that minimises the cost of assigning salespersons to department stores. You must make your method clear and show the table after each iteration.
  4. Find the minimum cost.
Question 2
View details
2. (a) Explain the difference between the classical and the practical travelling salesperson problems. The table below shows the distances, in km, between six data collection points, \(\mathrm { A } , \mathrm { B } , \mathrm { C } , \mathrm { D } , \mathrm { E }\), and F .
ABCDEF
A-7734566721
B77-58583674
C3458-737042
D565873-6838
E67367068-71
F2174423871-
Rachel must visit each collection point. She will start and finish at A and wishes to minimise the total distance travelled.
(b) Starting at A, use the nearest neighbour algorithm to obtain an upper bound. Make your method clear. Starting at B, a second upper bound of 293 km was found.
(c) State the better upper bound of these two, giving a reason for your answer. By deleting A, a lower bound was found to be 245 km .
(d) By deleting B, find a second lower bound. Make your method clear.
(e) State the better lower bound of these two, giving a reason for your answer.
(f) Taking your answers to (c) and (e), use inequalities to write down an interval that must contain the length of Rachel's optimal route.
Question 3
View details
3. A two-person zero-sum game is represented by the following pay-off matrix for player A.
B plays 1B plays 2B plays 3
A plays 1- 56- 3
A plays 21- 413
A plays 3- 23- 1
  1. Verify that there is no stable solution to this game.
  2. Reduce the game so that player B has a choice of only two actions.
  3. Write down the reduced pay-off matrix for player B.
  4. Find the best strategy for player B and the value of the game to player B.
Question 4
View details
4. \begin{figure}[h]
\includegraphics[alt={},max width=\textwidth]{4002eb3f-9d7e-40a1-8fd4-5a271d14c8e7-5_888_1607_248_228} \captionsetup{labelformat=empty} \caption{Figure 1}
\end{figure} Figure 1 shows a capacitated network. The capacity of each arc is shown on the arc. The numbers in circles represent an initial flow from S to T . Two cuts \(\mathrm { C } _ { 1 }\) and \(\mathrm { C } _ { 2 }\) are shown in Figure 1.
  1. Find the capacity of each of the two cuts.
    (2)
  2. Find the maximum flow through the network. You must list each flow-augmenting route you use together with its flow.
    (3)
Question 5
View details
5. While solving a maximising linear programming problem, the following tableau was obtained.
Basic Variablexyzrstvalue
z\(\frac { 1 } { 4 }\)\(- \frac { 1 } { 4 }\)1\(\frac { 1 } { 4 }\)002
s\(\frac { 5 } { 4 }\)\(\frac { 7 } { 4 }\)0\(- \frac { 3 } { 4 }\)104
t3\(\frac { 5 } { 2 }\)0\(- \frac { 1 } { 2 }\)012
P-2-40\(\frac { 5 } { 4 }\)0010
  1. Write down the values of \(\mathrm { x } , \mathrm { y }\) and z as indicated by this tableau.
  2. Write down the profit equation from the tableau.
Question 6
View details
6. The table below shows the cost, in pounds, of transporting one unit of stock from each of three supply points, \(\mathrm { X } , \mathrm { Y }\) and Z to three demand points, \(\mathrm { A } , \mathrm { B }\) and C . It also shows the stock held at each supply point and the stock required at each demand point.
\(\mathbf { A }\)\(\mathbf { B }\)\(\mathbf { C }\)Supply
\(\mathbf { X }\)178722
\(\mathbf { Y }\)16121517
\(\mathbf { Z }\)610915
Demand161523
  1. This is a balanced problem. Explain what this means.
  2. Use the north west corner method to obtain a possible solution.
  3. Taking ZA as the entering cell, use the stepping-stone method to find an improved solution. Make your route clear and state your exiting cell.
  4. Perform one more iteration of the stepping-stone method to find a further improved solution. You must make your shadow costs, improvement indices, entering cell, exiting cell and route clear.
  5. State the cost of the solution you found in part (d).
Question 7
View details
7. Minty has \(\pounds 250000\) to allocate to three investment schemes. She will allocate the money to these schemes in units of \(\pounds 50000\). The net income generated by each scheme, in \(\pounds 1000\) s, is given in the table below.
\(\mathbf { \pounds 0 }\)\(\mathbf { \pounds 5 0 0 0 0 }\)\(\mathbf { \pounds 1 0 0 0 0 0 }\)\(\mathbf { \pounds 1 5 0 0 0 0 }\)\(\mathbf { \pounds 2 0 0 0 0 0 }\)\(\mathbf { \pounds 2 5 0 0 0 0 }\)
Scheme1060120180240300
Scheme 2065125190235280
Scheme 3055110170230300
Minty wishes to maximise the net income. She decides to use dynamic programming to determine the optimal allocation, and starts the table shown in your answer book.
  1. Complete the table in the answer book to determine the amount Minty should allocate to each scheme in order to maximise the income. State the maximum income and the amount that should be allocated to each scheme.
  2. For this problem give the meaning of the table headings
    1. Stage,
    2. State,
    3. Action.
Question 8
View details
8. Laura (L) and Sam (S) play a two-person zero-sum game which is represented by the following pay-off matrix for Laura.
S plays 1S plays 2S plays 3
L plays 1- 28- 1
L plays 274- 3
L plays 31- 54
Formulate the game as a linear programming problem for Laura, writing the constraints as inequalities. Define your variables clearly.