A question is this type if and only if the data form a 3-row by 3-column contingency table requiring a chi-squared test of independence with 4 degrees of freedom, with no need to combine cells.
14 questions · Standard +0.4
| \multirow{2}{*}{} | Bus company | ||||
| \(A\) | \(B\) | \(C\) | Total | ||
| \multirow{3}{*}{Arrival} | Early | 22 | 22 | 10 | 54 |
| On time | 30 | 52 | 42 | 124 | |
| Late | 28 | 26 | 18 | 72 | |
| Total | 80 | 100 | 70 | 250 | |
| \multirow{2}{*}{} | Region | ||||
| A | B | C | Total | ||
| \multirow{3}{*}{Performance} | Above target | 62 | 41 | 44 | 147 |
| On target | 102 | 94 | 95 | 291 | |
| Below target | 56 | 45 | 61 | 162 | |
| Total | 220 | 180 | 200 | 600 | |
| Paint A | Paint B | Paint C | Paint D | Paint E |
| 64 | 66 | 59 | 65 | 64 |
| 58 | 68 | 56 | 78 | 52 |
| 73 | 76 | 69 | 69 | 56 |
| 60 | 70 | 60 | 72 | 61 |
| 67 | 71 | 63 | 71 | 58 |
| Fertiliser A | Fertiliser B | Fertiliser C | Fertiliser D | Fertiliser E |
| 23.6 | 26.0 | 18.8 | 29.0 | 17.7 |
| 18.2 | 35.3 | 16.7 | 37.2 | 16.5 |
| 32.4 | 30.5 | 23.0 | 32.6 | 12.8 |
| 20.8 | 31.4 | 28.3 | 31.4 | 20.4 |
| Contractor A | Contractor B | Contractor C | Contractor D |
| 41 | 54 | 56 | 41 |
| 49 | 45 | 45 | 36 |
| 50 | 50 | 54 | 46 |
| 44 | 50 | 50 | 38 |
| 56 | 47 | 49 | 35 |
| Variety | |||
| A | B | C | D |
| 12.3 | 14.2 | 14.1 | 13.6 |
| 11.9 | 13.1 | 13.2 | 12.8 |
| 12.8 | 13.1 | 14.6 | 13.3 |
| 12.2 | 12.5 | 13.7 | 14.3 |
| 13.5 | 12.7 | 13.4 | 13.8 |
| \multirow{2}{*}{} | Growth | \multirow[t]{2}{*}{Row totals} | |||
| Good | Average | Poor | |||
| \multirow{3}{*}{Type of plant} | Coriander | 12 | 28 | 15 | 55 |
| Aster | 7 | 18 | 23 | 48 | |
| Fennel | 14 | 22 | 11 | 47 | |
| Column totals | 33 | 68 | 49 | 150 | |
| Site | \multirow{2}{*}{
| ||||||
| \cline { 3 - 6 } \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{} | A | B | C | ||||
\multirow{3}{*}{
| Large | 15 | 12 | 10 | 37 | ||
| \cline { 2 - 6 } | Medium | 28 | 17 | 45 | 90 | ||
| \cline { 2 - 6 } | Small | 47 | 33 | 36 | 116 | ||
| Column totals | 90 | 62 | 91 | 243 | |||
| \cline { 2 - 5 } | In favour | Neutral | Against | |
| \cline { 2 - 5 } | Democrat | 58 | 16 | 16 |
| \cline { 2 - 5 } Party | Independent | 25 | 4 | 11 |
| \cline { 2 - 5 } | Republican | 17 | 20 | 33 |
| \cline { 2 - 5 } | ||||
| \cline { 2 - 5 } |
| \cline { 3 - 5 } \multicolumn{2}{c|}{} | Colour of car | |||
| \cline { 3 - 5 } \multicolumn{2}{c|}{} | Silver | Blue | Red | |
| \multirow{3}{*}{Type of car} | Hatchback | 53 | 36 | 41 |
| \cline { 2 - 5 } | Saloon | 29 | 40 | 31 |
| \cline { 2 - 5 } | Estate | 28 | 24 | 18 |
| ITV | Channel 4 | Channel 5 | |
| Family Saloon | 69 | 35 | 28 |
| Sports Car | 20 | 28 | 18 |
| Off-road Vehicle | 12 | 22 | 8 |
| \backslashbox{2nd colour}{1st colour} | Red | Blue | Yellow | Total |
| Red | 31 | 11 | 18 | 60 |
| Blue | 8 | 10 | 9 | 27 |
| Yellow | 21 | 9 | 33 | 63 |
| Total | 60 | 30 | 60 | 150 |
| Question | Solution | Marks | AOs | Guidance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | (a) | -0.954 BC | B2 [2] | 1.1 1.1 | SC: If B0, give B1 if two of 7.04, 29.0[4], -13.6[4] (or 35.2, 145[.2], -68.2) seen | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | (b) | Points lie close to a straight line Line has negative gradient | B1 B1 [2] | 2.2b 1.1 | Must refer to line, not just "negative correlation" | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | (c) | No, it will be the same as \(x \rightarrow a\) is a linear transformation | B1 [1] | 2.2a | OE. Either "same" with correct reason, or "disagree" with correct reason. Allow any clear valid technical term | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | (a) | Neither | B1 [1] | 1.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | (b) | \(q = 1.13 + 0.620 p\) | B1B1 B1 [3] | 1.1,1.1 1.1 | 0.62(0) correct; both numbers correct Fully correct answer including letters | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | (c) | (i) | 2.68 | B1ft [1] | 1.1 | awrt 2.68, ft on their (b) if letters correct | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | (c) | (ii) | 2.5 is within data range, and points (here) are close to line/well correlated | B1 B1 [2] | 2.2b 2.2b | At least one reason, allow "no because points not close to line" Full argument, two reasons needed | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | (d) |
| M1 A1 [2] | 2.3 1.1 | Reason for not very reliable (not "extrapolation") Full argument and conclusion, not too assertive (not wholly unreliable!) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | (a) | Expected frequency for Middle/25 to 60 is 4.4 which is < 5 so must combine cells | B1*ft depB1 [2] | 2.4 3.5b | Correctly obtain this \(F _ { E }\), ft on addition errors " < 5" explicit and correct deduction | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | (b) |
| B1 | 1.1 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Question | Solution | Marks | AOs | Guidance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | (c) |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | (d) | The two biggest contributions to \(\chi ^ { 2 }\) are both for the late session ... ... when the proportion of younger people is higher, and of older people is lower, than the null hypothesis would suggest. |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| \multirow[t]{2}{*}{4} | \multirow{2}{*}{} | \multirow{2}{*}{OR:} |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| \(\frac { 2 m ( 2 m - 1 ) \times m \times 3 ! } { 3 m ( 3 m - 1 ) ( 3 m - 2 ) \times 2 }\) then as above |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||