CAIE S2 2016 November — Question 7 11 marks

Exam BoardCAIE
ModuleS2 (Statistics 2)
Year2016
SessionNovember
Marks11
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicType I/II errors and power of test
TypeState meaning of Type II error
DifficultyStandard +0.3 This is a straightforward hypothesis testing question covering standard S2 content: one-tailed z-test with known variance, calculating Type II error probability using normal distribution, and stating a definition. All parts follow routine procedures with no novel problem-solving required, making it slightly easier than average.
Spec2.05a Hypothesis testing language: null, alternative, p-value, significance5.05c Hypothesis test: normal distribution for population mean

7 In the past the time, in minutes, taken for a particular rail journey has been found to have mean 20.5 and standard deviation 1.2. Some new railway signals are installed. In order to test whether the mean time has decreased, a random sample of 100 times for this journey are noted. The sample mean is found to be 20.3 minutes. You should assume that the standard deviation is unchanged.
  1. Carry out a significance test, at the \(4 \%\) level, of whether the population mean time has decreased. Later another significance test of the same hypotheses, using another random sample of size 100 , is carried out at the \(4 \%\) level.
  2. Given that the population mean is now 20.1, find the probability of a Type II error.
  3. State what is meant by a Type II error in this context.

Question 7:
Part (i):
AnswerMarks Guidance
Answer/WorkingMarks Guidance
\(H_0\): Pop mean time (or \(\mu\)) \(= 20.5\)
\(H_1\): Pop mean time (or \(\mu\)) \(< 20.5\)B1 Not just "mean"
\(\frac{20.3 - 20.5}{1.2 \div \sqrt{100}}\)M1 Allow without \(\sqrt{}\) sign (accept \(\pm 1.667/1.67\))
\(= -1.667\) or \(0.0478/0.952\) if areas comparedA1
\(1.667 < 1.751\) (or \(-1.667 > -1.751\))M1 Correct comparison of their \(z_\text{calc}\) with \(1.751/1.75\) oe valid comparison of areas \((0.0478 > 0.04)\)
No evidence that (pop) mean time has decreasedA1ft [5] No contradictions (ft their \(z\))
Part (ii):
AnswerMarks Guidance
Answer/WorkingMarks Guidance
\(\frac{cv - 20.5}{1.2 \div \sqrt{100}} = -1.751\)M1*
\(cv = 20.29\) or \(20.3\)A1
\(\frac{20.29 - 20.1}{1.2 \div \sqrt{100}}\) \((= 1.583\) or \(1.582)\)DM1 Allow \(\frac{20.3 - 20.1}{1.2 \div \sqrt{100}}\) \((= 1.667)\) — M1
\(1 - \Phi(1.583)\)M1 \(1 - \Phi(1.667)\) — M1
\(= 0.0567 - 0.0569\) (3 sf)A1 [5] \(= 0.0478\) (3 sf) — A1
Part (iii):
AnswerMarks Guidance
Answer/WorkingMarks Guidance
Concluding (mean) time not decreased when in fact it has.B1 [1] Must be in context, oe
## Question 7:

### Part (i):
| Answer/Working | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| $H_0$: Pop mean time (or $\mu$) $= 20.5$ | | |
| $H_1$: Pop mean time (or $\mu$) $< 20.5$ | B1 | Not just "mean" |
| $\frac{20.3 - 20.5}{1.2 \div \sqrt{100}}$ | M1 | Allow without $\sqrt{}$ sign (accept $\pm 1.667/1.67$) |
| $= -1.667$ or $0.0478/0.952$ if areas compared | A1 | |
| $1.667 < 1.751$ (or $-1.667 > -1.751$) | M1 | Correct comparison of their $z_\text{calc}$ with $1.751/1.75$ oe valid comparison of areas $(0.0478 > 0.04)$ |
| No evidence that (pop) mean time has decreased | A1ft [5] | No contradictions (ft their $z$) |

### Part (ii):
| Answer/Working | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| $\frac{cv - 20.5}{1.2 \div \sqrt{100}} = -1.751$ | M1* | |
| $cv = 20.29$ or $20.3$ | A1 | |
| $\frac{20.29 - 20.1}{1.2 \div \sqrt{100}}$ $(= 1.583$ or $1.582)$ | DM1 | Allow $\frac{20.3 - 20.1}{1.2 \div \sqrt{100}}$ $(= 1.667)$ — M1 |
| $1 - \Phi(1.583)$ | M1 | $1 - \Phi(1.667)$ — M1 |
| $= 0.0567 - 0.0569$ (3 sf) | A1 [5] | $= 0.0478$ (3 sf) — A1 |

### Part (iii):
| Answer/Working | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Concluding (mean) time not decreased when in fact it has. | B1 [1] | Must be in context, oe |
7 In the past the time, in minutes, taken for a particular rail journey has been found to have mean 20.5 and standard deviation 1.2. Some new railway signals are installed. In order to test whether the mean time has decreased, a random sample of 100 times for this journey are noted. The sample mean is found to be 20.3 minutes. You should assume that the standard deviation is unchanged.\\
(i) Carry out a significance test, at the $4 \%$ level, of whether the population mean time has decreased.

Later another significance test of the same hypotheses, using another random sample of size 100 , is carried out at the $4 \%$ level.\\
(ii) Given that the population mean is now 20.1, find the probability of a Type II error.\\
(iii) State what is meant by a Type II error in this context.

\hfill \mbox{\textit{CAIE S2 2016 Q7 [11]}}