CAIE S2 2008 June — Question 5 8 marks

Exam BoardCAIE
ModuleS2 (Statistics 2)
Year2008
SessionJune
Marks8
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicHypothesis test of a Poisson distribution
TypeOne-tailed test (increase or decrease)
DifficultyStandard +0.3 This is a straightforward application of Poisson hypothesis testing with standard procedures: calculating a mean, finding a critical region from tables, identifying Type I error probability, and making a conclusion. The calculations are routine and the concepts are core S2 material, making it slightly easier than average A-level difficulty.
Spec2.05a Hypothesis testing language: null, alternative, p-value, significance2.05b Hypothesis test for binomial proportion5.02i Poisson distribution: random events model5.02j Poisson formula: P(X=x) = e^(-lambda)*lambda^x/x!

5 When a guitar is played regularly, a string breaks on average once every 15 months. Broken strings occur at random times and independently of each other.
  1. Show that the mean number of broken strings in a 5 -year period is 4 . A guitar is fitted with a new type of string which, it is claimed, breaks less frequently. The number of broken strings of the new type was noted after a period of 5 years.
  2. The mean number of broken strings of the new type in a 5 -year period is denoted by \(\lambda\). Find the rejection region for a test at the \(10 \%\) significance level when the null hypothesis \(\lambda = 4\) is tested against the alternative hypothesis \(\lambda < 4\).
  3. Hence calculate the probability of making a Type I error. The number of broken guitar strings of the new type, in a 5 -year period, was in fact 1 .
  4. State, with a reason, whether there is evidence at the \(10 \%\) significance level that guitar strings of the new type break less frequently.

AnswerMarks Guidance
(i)1 in 15 months is equivalent to 4 in 60 months B1 [1]
(ii)\(P(0) = e^{-4} = 0.01831\) M1*
\(P(1) = e^{-4} \times 4 = 0.07326\)M1* Comparing sum with 0.10
\(P(2) = e^{-4} \times 4^2/2 = 0.147\) too bigM1 Considering and rejecting P(2)
\(P(0) + P(1) = 0.0916\)A1*dep [4] Correct answer. No errors seen.
Rejection region at 10% level is 0 or 1.
(iii)\(P(\text{Type I error}) = 0.0916\) B1 [1]
(iv)1 is in rejection region B1
There is evidence that the new guitar string lasts longerB1ft [2] Correct conclusion ft their rejection region
(i) | 1 in 15 months is equivalent to 4 in 60 months | B1 [1] | Or equivalent

(ii) | $P(0) = e^{-4} = 0.01831$ | M1* | Attempt to find P(0) and / or P(1)

$P(1) = e^{-4} \times 4 = 0.07326$ | M1* | Comparing sum with 0.10

$P(2) = e^{-4} \times 4^2/2 = 0.147$ too big | M1 | Considering and rejecting P(2)

$P(0) + P(1) = 0.0916$ | A1*dep [4] | Correct answer. No errors seen.

Rejection region at 10% level is 0 or 1. |

(iii) | $P(\text{Type I error}) = 0.0916$ | B1 [1] | Correct answer

(iv) | 1 is in rejection region | B1 | Identifying where 1 is

There is evidence that the new guitar string lasts longer | B1ft [2] | Correct conclusion ft their rejection region

---
5 When a guitar is played regularly, a string breaks on average once every 15 months. Broken strings occur at random times and independently of each other.\\
(i) Show that the mean number of broken strings in a 5 -year period is 4 .

A guitar is fitted with a new type of string which, it is claimed, breaks less frequently. The number of broken strings of the new type was noted after a period of 5 years.\\
(ii) The mean number of broken strings of the new type in a 5 -year period is denoted by $\lambda$. Find the rejection region for a test at the $10 \%$ significance level when the null hypothesis $\lambda = 4$ is tested against the alternative hypothesis $\lambda < 4$.\\
(iii) Hence calculate the probability of making a Type I error.

The number of broken guitar strings of the new type, in a 5 -year period, was in fact 1 .\\
(iv) State, with a reason, whether there is evidence at the $10 \%$ significance level that guitar strings of the new type break less frequently.

\hfill \mbox{\textit{CAIE S2 2008 Q5 [8]}}