CAIE S2 2017 June — Question 4 8 marks

Exam BoardCAIE
ModuleS2 (Statistics 2)
Year2017
SessionJune
Marks8
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicZ-tests (known variance)
TypeTwo-tail z-test
DifficultyModerate -0.3 This is a straightforward two-tail hypothesis test with standard calculations. Part (i) requires routine formulas for unbiased estimates (sample mean and variance with n-1 denominator). Part (ii) is a textbook z-test application with given significance level and clear hypotheses. The calculations are mechanical with no conceptual challenges or novel problem-solving required, making it slightly easier than average.
Spec5.05b Unbiased estimates: of population mean and variance5.05c Hypothesis test: normal distribution for population mean

4 Last year the mean level of a certain pollutant in a river was found to be 0.034 grams per millilitre. This year the levels of pollutant, \(X\) grams per millilitre, were measured at a random sample of 200 locations in the river. The results are summarised below. $$n = 200 \quad \Sigma x = 6.7 \quad \Sigma x ^ { 2 } = 0.2312$$
  1. Calculate unbiased estimates of the population mean and variance.
  2. Test, at the \(10 \%\) significance level, whether the mean level of pollutant has changed.

Question 4(i):
AnswerMarks Guidance
AnswerMarks Guidance
\(\bar{x} = 6.7/200\ (= 67/2000 = 0.0335)\)B1
\(s^2 = \frac{200}{199}\times\!\left(\frac{0.2312}{200} - \text{"0.0335"}^2\right)\)M1 \(s^2 = \frac{0.2312}{200} - 0.0335^2\) M0
\(= 0.0000339(2) = 27/796000\)A1 \(= 0.00003375\) A0
Question 4(ii):
AnswerMarks Guidance
AnswerMarks Guidance
\(H_0\): Pop mean level \(= 0.034\); \(H_1\): Pop mean level \(\neq 0.034\)B1 Not just "mean", but allow just "\(\mu\)"
\(\frac{\text{"0.30335"} - 0.034}{\frac{\sqrt{\text{"0.00003392"}}}{\sqrt{200}}}\)M1 Must have \(\sqrt{200}\); \(\frac{0.0335-0.034}{\frac{\sqrt{\text{"0.00003375"}}}{\sqrt{200}}}\) M1
\(= -1.21(4)\) (3 sfs) \((-1.22 \leftrightarrow -1.21)\)A1 \(= -1.217\) (3 sfs) A1
Compare with \(z = -1.645\) (or \(0.1124 > 0.05\))M1 \(0.112 > 0.05\); valid comparison \(z\) or areas
No evidence that (mean) pollutant level has changed, accept \(H_0\) (if correctly defined)A1FT Correct conclusion no contradictions. SR: One tail test: B0, M1A1 as normal, M1 (comparison with 1.282 consistent signs) A0
## Question 4(i):

| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|--------|-------|----------|
| $\bar{x} = 6.7/200\ (= 67/2000 = 0.0335)$ | B1 | |
| $s^2 = \frac{200}{199}\times\!\left(\frac{0.2312}{200} - \text{"0.0335"}^2\right)$ | M1 | $s^2 = \frac{0.2312}{200} - 0.0335^2$ **M0** |
| $= 0.0000339(2) = 27/796000$ | A1 | $= 0.00003375$ **A0** |

---

## Question 4(ii):

| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|--------|-------|----------|
| $H_0$: Pop mean level $= 0.034$; $H_1$: Pop mean level $\neq 0.034$ | B1 | Not just "mean", but allow just "$\mu$" |
| $\frac{\text{"0.30335"} - 0.034}{\frac{\sqrt{\text{"0.00003392"}}}{\sqrt{200}}}$ | M1 | Must have $\sqrt{200}$; $\frac{0.0335-0.034}{\frac{\sqrt{\text{"0.00003375"}}}{\sqrt{200}}}$ **M1** |
| $= -1.21(4)$ (3 sfs) $(-1.22 \leftrightarrow -1.21)$ | A1 | $= -1.217$ (3 sfs) **A1** |
| Compare with $z = -1.645$ (or $0.1124 > 0.05$) | M1 | $0.112 > 0.05$; valid comparison $z$ or areas |
| No evidence that (mean) pollutant level has changed, accept $H_0$ (if correctly defined) | A1FT | Correct conclusion no contradictions. SR: One tail test: **B0**, **M1A1** as normal, **M1** (comparison with 1.282 consistent signs) **A0** |

---
4 Last year the mean level of a certain pollutant in a river was found to be 0.034 grams per millilitre. This year the levels of pollutant, $X$ grams per millilitre, were measured at a random sample of 200 locations in the river. The results are summarised below.

$$n = 200 \quad \Sigma x = 6.7 \quad \Sigma x ^ { 2 } = 0.2312$$

(i) Calculate unbiased estimates of the population mean and variance.\\

(ii) Test, at the $10 \%$ significance level, whether the mean level of pollutant has changed.\\

\hfill \mbox{\textit{CAIE S2 2017 Q4 [8]}}