OCR S3 2012 January — Question 1 6 marks

Exam BoardOCR
ModuleS3 (Statistics 3)
Year2012
SessionJanuary
Marks6
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicChi-squared test of independence
TypeTest statistic given, complete the test
DifficultyModerate -0.8 This is a straightforward chi-squared test question requiring only standard recall and routine application. Part (i) asks for standard hypotheses (independence vs association), part (ii) tests textbook knowledge of Yates' correction (subtract 0.5 from |O-E|, decreases χ²), and part (iii) is a simple comparison with critical value at 1 d.f. No problem-solving, calculation, or conceptual insight required—pure recall and standard procedure.
Spec5.06a Chi-squared: contingency tables

In a test of association of two factors, \(A\) and \(B\), a \(2 \times 2\) contingency table yielded \(5.63\) for the value of \(\chi^2\) with Yates' correction.
  1. State the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis for the test. [1]
  2. State how Yates' correction is applied, and whether it increases or decreases the value of \(\chi^2\). [2]
  3. Carry out the test at the \(2\frac{1}{2}\%\) significance level. [3]

(i)
AnswerMarks Guidance
\(H_0: A \text{ and } B \text{ are not associated}\)\(B1\) For both. Allow indpt., not indpt.
\(H_1: A \text{ and } B \text{ are associated}\)\([1]\)
(ii)
AnswerMarks Guidance
Yates \(\chi^2 = \sum\frac{(O - E - 0.5)^2}{E}\)
which decreases the value\(B1\)
\([2]\)
(iii)
AnswerMarks Guidance
CV 5.024 seen\(B1\) Ft their CV
\(5.63 > \text{CV}\) and reject \(H_0\)\(M1\) Allow B1 if correct conclusion, but comparison not shown. CWO (ie from 5.024)
There is evidence at the \(2\frac{1}{2}\%\) SL of an association between \(A\) and \(B\)\(A1\)
\([3]\)
### (i)
$H_0: A \text{ and } B \text{ are not associated}$ | $B1$ | For both. Allow indpt., not indpt.
$H_1: A \text{ and } B \text{ are associated}$ | $[1]$ |

### (ii)
Yates $\chi^2 = \sum\frac{(|O - E| - 0.5)^2}{E}$ | $B1$ | Dep '-0.5' seen.
which decreases the value | $B1$ | 
| $[2]$ |

### (iii)
CV 5.024 seen | $B1$ | Ft their CV
$5.63 > \text{CV}$ and reject $H_0$ | $M1$ | Allow B1 if correct conclusion, but comparison not shown. CWO (ie from 5.024)
There is evidence at the $2\frac{1}{2}\%$ SL of an association between $A$ and $B$ | $A1$ |
| $[3]$ |
In a test of association of two factors, $A$ and $B$, a $2 \times 2$ contingency table yielded $5.63$ for the value of $\chi^2$ with Yates' correction.

\begin{enumerate}[label=(\roman*)]
\item State the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis for the test. [1]

\item State how Yates' correction is applied, and whether it increases or decreases the value of $\chi^2$. [2]

\item Carry out the test at the $2\frac{1}{2}\%$ significance level. [3]
\end{enumerate}

\hfill \mbox{\textit{OCR S3 2012 Q1 [6]}}