CAIE S2 2016 June — Question 4 7 marks

Exam BoardCAIE
ModuleS2 (Statistics 2)
Year2016
SessionJune
Marks7
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicHypothesis test of a Poisson distribution
TypeFind critical region
DifficultyStandard +0.3 This is a straightforward hypothesis testing question requiring standard Poisson distribution calculations. Students need to find a critical region (routine procedure), compare the test statistic, and recall definitions of Type I and Type II errors. While it involves multiple parts, each step follows textbook procedures with no novel insight required, making it slightly easier than average.
Spec2.05a Hypothesis testing language: null, alternative, p-value, significance5.05b Unbiased estimates: of population mean and variance

The number of sightings of a golden eagle at a certain location has a Poisson distribution with mean 2.5 per week. Drilling for oil is started nearby. A naturalist wishes to test at the 5\% significance level whether there are fewer sightings since the drilling began. He notes that during the following 3 weeks there are 2 sightings.
  1. Find the critical region for the test and carry out the test. [5]
  2. State the probability of a Type I error. [1]
  3. State why the naturalist could not have made a Type II error. [1]

The number of sightings of a golden eagle at a certain location has a Poisson distribution with mean 2.5 per week. Drilling for oil is started nearby. A naturalist wishes to test at the 5\% significance level whether there are fewer sightings since the drilling began. He notes that during the following 3 weeks there are 2 sightings.

\begin{enumerate}[label=(\roman*)]
\item Find the critical region for the test and carry out the test. [5]

\item State the probability of a Type I error. [1]

\item State why the naturalist could not have made a Type II error. [1]
\end{enumerate}

\hfill \mbox{\textit{CAIE S2 2016 Q4 [7]}}