| Exam Board | Edexcel |
|---|---|
| Module | FD1 (Further Decision 1) |
| Session | Specimen |
| Marks | 11 |
| Paper | Download PDF ↗ |
| Mark scheme | Download PDF ↗ |
| Topic | Travelling Salesman |
| Type | Lower Bound by Vertex Deletion |
| Difficulty | Standard +0.3 This is a standard Further Maths D1 question testing routine application of the vertex deletion algorithm for TSP lower bounds, plus basic nearest neighbour algorithm. Part (a) is definitional recall, (b) follows a prescribed method with straightforward MST calculation, (c) requires working backwards from given information but is mechanical, and (d) is direct application of bounds. While it's a multi-part question worth several marks, each component uses standard algorithms without requiring problem-solving insight or novel approaches—slightly easier than average A-level difficulty. |
| Spec | 7.04c Travelling salesman upper bound: nearest neighbour method7.04d Travelling salesman lower bound: using minimum spanning tree |
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | |
| A | - | 17 | 24 | 16 | 21 | 18 | 41 |
| B | 17 | - | 35 | 25 | 30 | 31 | \(x\) |
| C | 24 | 35 | - | 28 | 20 | 35 | 32 |
| D | 16 | 25 | 28 | - | 29 | 19 | 45 |
| E | 21 | 30 | 20 | 29 | - | 22 | 35 |
| F | 18 | 31 | 35 | 19 | 22 | - | 37 |
| G | 41 | \(x\) | 32 | 45 | 35 | 37 | - |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer | Mark | Guidance |
| In the practical problem each vertex must be visited at least once; in the classical problem each vertex must be visited just once | B2,1,0 | Understands the difference is connected to number of times each vertex may be visited. Must attempt a difference referring to both problems explicitly. Technical language must be correct. Need not imply each/every/all vertices for first mark |
| Second B1: must imply each/every/all vertices are visited; e.g. 'the practical visits a vertex at least once while the classical visits a vertex only once' (B1B0 note that B0B1 is not possible) |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer | Mark | Guidance |
| Prim's algorithm on reduced network starting at A: AD, AF, AE, CE, CG | M1 | Correctly applying Prim's algorithm from node A for the first four arcs (or five nodes) |
| Lower bound \(= 107 + 17 + 25 = 149\) (km) | M1 | Candidates weight of their RMST \(+ 17 + 25\) (the two smallest arcs incident to B) |
| A1 | cao (condone lack of units) |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer | Mark | Guidance |
| NNA from A: \(A-D-F-E-C-G-B-A = 126+x\) | M1 | Either one route, must return to A |
| NNA from C: \(C-E-A-D-F-B-G-C = 139+x\) | A1 | One correct route with corresponding length correct (do not include if correct lengths seen but are then doubled) |
| A1 | Both routes correct and their corresponding lengths correct | |
| \((126+x)+(139+x) = 331 \Rightarrow x = 33\) | A1 | cao for \(x\) |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer | Mark | Guidance |
| \(149 < \text{optimal} \leqslant 159\) | M1 | Their numbers correctly used; accept any inequalities or any indication of interval from their 149 to their 159 (so \(149-159\) can score this mark). Dependent on two routes seen in (c); neither total needs to be correct. Note \(UB > LB\) for this mark |
| A1 | cao (no follow through on their values) including correct inequalities or equivalent set notation (but condone \(149 \leqslant \text{optimal} \leqslant 159\)) |
# Question 3:
## Part (a)
| Answer | Mark | Guidance |
|--------|------|----------|
| In the practical problem each vertex must be visited at least once; in the classical problem each vertex must be visited just once | B2,1,0 | Understands the difference is connected to number of times each vertex may be visited. Must attempt a difference referring to both problems explicitly. Technical language must be correct. Need not imply each/every/all vertices for first mark |
| | | Second B1: must imply each/every/all vertices are visited; e.g. 'the practical visits a vertex at least once while the classical visits a vertex only once' (B1B0 note that B0B1 is not possible) |
## Part (b)
| Answer | Mark | Guidance |
|--------|------|----------|
| Prim's algorithm on reduced network starting at A: AD, AF, AE, CE, CG | M1 | Correctly applying Prim's algorithm from node A for the first four arcs (or five nodes) |
| Lower bound $= 107 + 17 + 25 = 149$ (km) | M1 | Candidates weight of their RMST $+ 17 + 25$ (the two smallest arcs incident to B) |
| | A1 | cao (condone lack of units) |
## Part (c)
| Answer | Mark | Guidance |
|--------|------|----------|
| NNA from A: $A-D-F-E-C-G-B-A = 126+x$ | M1 | Either one route, must return to A |
| NNA from C: $C-E-A-D-F-B-G-C = 139+x$ | A1 | One correct route with corresponding length correct (do not include if correct lengths seen but are then doubled) |
| | A1 | Both routes correct and their corresponding lengths correct |
| $(126+x)+(139+x) = 331 \Rightarrow x = 33$ | A1 | cao for $x$ |
## Part (d)
| Answer | Mark | Guidance |
|--------|------|----------|
| $149 < \text{optimal} \leqslant 159$ | M1 | Their numbers correctly used; accept any inequalities or any indication of interval from their 149 to their 159 (so $149-159$ can score this mark). Dependent on two routes seen in (c); neither total needs to be correct. Note $UB > LB$ for this mark |
| | A1 | cao (no follow through on their values) including correct inequalities or equivalent set notation (but condone $149 \leqslant \text{optimal} \leqslant 159$) |
---
3. (a) Explain clearly the difference between the classical travelling salesperson problem and the practical travelling salesperson problem.
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|}
\hline
& A & B & C & D & E & F & G \\
\hline
A & - & 17 & 24 & 16 & 21 & 18 & 41 \\
\hline
B & 17 & - & 35 & 25 & 30 & 31 & $x$ \\
\hline
C & 24 & 35 & - & 28 & 20 & 35 & 32 \\
\hline
D & 16 & 25 & 28 & - & 29 & 19 & 45 \\
\hline
E & 21 & 30 & 20 & 29 & - & 22 & 35 \\
\hline
F & 18 & 31 & 35 & 19 & 22 & - & 37 \\
\hline
G & 41 & $x$ & 32 & 45 & 35 & 37 & - \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
The table shows the least distances, in km, by road between seven towns, A, B, C, D, E, F and G . The least distance between B and G is $x \mathrm {~km}$, where $x > 25$
Preety needs to visit each town at least once, starting and finishing at A. She wishes to minimise the total distance she travels.\\
(b) Starting by deleting B and all of its arcs, find a lower bound for Preety's route.
Preety found the nearest neighbour routes from each of A and C . Given that the sum of the lengths of these routes is 331 km ,\\
(c) find $x$, making your method clear.\\
(d) Write down the smallest interval that you can be confident contains the optimal length of Preety's route. Give your answer as an inequality.\\
\hfill \mbox{\textit{Edexcel FD1 Q3 [11]}}