| Exam Board | Edexcel |
|---|---|
| Module | FM1 (Further Mechanics 1) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Session | June |
| Marks | 14 |
| Paper | Download PDF ↗ |
| Mark scheme | Download PDF ↗ |
| Topic | Oblique and successive collisions |
| Type | Ball between two walls, successive rebounds |
| Difficulty | Challenging +1.2 This is a standard Further Mechanics 1 collision question requiring systematic application of restitution laws and geometric relationships. Parts (a)-(b) involve routine resolution of velocities and applying e = (separation speed)/(approach speed) perpendicular to walls. Part (c) requires angle sum reasoning in triangle APQ. Part (d) is a straightforward deduction from the given result. While it's multi-part and requires careful bookkeeping, it follows predictable FM1 patterns without requiring novel insight—slightly above average difficulty due to the geometric coordination needed across multiple collisions. |
| Spec | 6.03k Newton's experimental law: direct impact6.03l Newton's law: oblique impacts |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer/Working | Mark | Guidance |
| \(V\sin\beta = e_1 U\sin\alpha\) | B1 | 3.4 – \(e_1 U\sin\alpha\) seen from a relevant equation or diagram |
| \(V\cos\beta = U\cos\alpha\) | B1 | 3.4 – \(U\cos\alpha\) seen in a relevant equation or diagram |
| Eliminate \(U\) and \(V\) from two equations | M1 | 1.1b – A clear method using two equations to eliminate \(U\) and \(V\) |
| \(\tan\beta = e_1\tan\alpha\) * | A1* | 2.2a – Given answer correctly obtained. Must include both equations showing how to reach both \(\tan\beta\) and \(e_1\tan\alpha\). Accept \(\tan\beta = e_1\tan\alpha\) or \(e_1\tan\alpha = \tan\beta\) |
| Total | (4) |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer/Working | Mark | Guidance |
| \(\tan\gamma = e_2\tan(90°-\beta)\), so \(\tan\gamma = e_2\cot\beta\), \(\cot\gamma = \dfrac{\tan\beta}{e_2}\) | B1 | 1.1b – Form correct expression for \(\tan\gamma\) or \(\cot\gamma\) in terms of \(e_2\) and \(\beta\) or \((90-\beta)\). May quote result from (a) or obtain again |
| \(\tan\gamma = e_2 \times \dfrac{1}{\tan\beta} = e_2 \times \dfrac{1}{e_1\tan\alpha}\) | M1 | 3.1b – Use result from (a) to eliminate \(\tan\beta\) and form equation in \(\alpha\), \(\gamma\), \(e_1\), \(e_2\) |
| \(e_1\tan\alpha = e_2\cot\gamma\) * | A1* | 2.2a – Given answer correctly obtained. Must include replacement of \(\tan\beta\) and rearrangement. Accept \(e_1\tan\alpha = e_2\cot\gamma\) or \(e_2\cot\gamma = e_1\tan\alpha\) |
| Total | (3) |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer/Working | Mark | Guidance |
| \((\text{angle } APQ + \text{angle } AQP) = (180°-\alpha-\beta)+\{180°-(90°-\beta)-\gamma\} = 270°-\alpha-\gamma\). Otherwise: angle \(PAQ = \alpha+\gamma-90°\) | M1 | 1.1b – Clear attempt to find angle sum (condone slips) or another relevant starting point e.g. expression for angle \(PAQ\) |
| To return to \(A\): angle \(APQ\) + angle \(AQP < 180°\) since \(APQ\) is a triangle. Otherwise: angle \(PAQ > 0\) | M1 | 3.1b – Clear statement to form inequality e.g. correct angle sum \(< 180°\) is acceptable, or angle \(PAQ > 0\) |
| \(270°-\alpha-\gamma < 180° \Rightarrow \alpha > 90°-\gamma\) | A1 | 1.1b – Correct simplified inequality in correct form |
| \(\tan\alpha > \tan(90°-\gamma)\) – correct method using addition formulae | M1 | 1.1b – Correct method to form inequality in tan or cot |
| \(\dfrac{e_2\cot\gamma}{e_1} > \cot\gamma\) | M1 | 1.1b – Using part (b) to eliminate the angles |
| \(e_2 > e_1\) * | A1* | 2.2a – Given answer correctly obtained |
| Total | (6) |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer/Working | Mark | Guidance |
| From (b), \(\alpha = 90°-\gamma\), so it moves parallel to \(AP\), e.g. parallel to the initial velocity | B1 | 2.4 |
| Total | (1) |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer/Working | Mark | Guidance |
| (angle \(APQ\) + angle \(AQP\)) \(= (180° - \alpha - \beta) + \{180° - (90° - \beta) - \gamma\} = 270 - \alpha - \gamma\) | M1 | |
| To return to \(A\), (angle \(APQ\) + angle \(AQP\)) \(< 180°\), since \(APQ\) is a triangle | M1 | |
| \(\tan(\alpha + \gamma) = \dfrac{\tan\alpha + \tan\gamma}{1 - \tan\alpha\tan\gamma}\) and \(\tan\alpha = \dfrac{e_2\cot\gamma}{e_1}\) or \(\tan\alpha = \dfrac{e_2}{e_1\tan\gamma}\), leads to \(\tan(\alpha+\gamma) = \dfrac{e_2 + e_1\tan^2\gamma}{e_1\tan\gamma - e_2\tan\gamma}\) oe | A1 | |
| \(180 > (\alpha+\gamma) > 90 \Rightarrow \tan(\alpha+\gamma) < 0 \Rightarrow \dfrac{e_2 + e_1\tan^2\gamma}{e_1\tan\gamma - e_2\tan\gamma} < 0\) | M1 | Condone if '\(180 >\)' is not stated again |
| Since numerator \(> 0\), therefore \(e_1\tan\gamma - e_2\tan\gamma < 0\) | M1 | |
| \(e_2 > e_1\) * | A1 |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer/Working | Mark | Guidance |
| \(\alpha = 90° - \gamma\), so it moves parallel to \(AP\); or \(\alpha = 90° - \gamma\), so it moves parallel to the initial velocity | B1 | Use given information from (b) to make any equivalent statement with a correct reason and no incorrect statements. Do not accept 'it moves parallel to the initial speed' |
# Question 7(a):
| Answer/Working | Mark | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| $V\sin\beta = e_1 U\sin\alpha$ | B1 | 3.4 – $e_1 U\sin\alpha$ seen from a relevant equation or diagram |
| $V\cos\beta = U\cos\alpha$ | B1 | 3.4 – $U\cos\alpha$ seen in a relevant equation or diagram |
| Eliminate $U$ and $V$ from two equations | M1 | 1.1b – A clear method using **two equations** to eliminate $U$ and $V$ |
| $\tan\beta = e_1\tan\alpha$ * | A1* | 2.2a – Given answer correctly obtained. Must include both equations showing how to reach both $\tan\beta$ and $e_1\tan\alpha$. Accept $\tan\beta = e_1\tan\alpha$ or $e_1\tan\alpha = \tan\beta$ |
| **Total** | **(4)** | |
# Question 7(b):
| Answer/Working | Mark | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| $\tan\gamma = e_2\tan(90°-\beta)$, so $\tan\gamma = e_2\cot\beta$, $\cot\gamma = \dfrac{\tan\beta}{e_2}$ | B1 | 1.1b – Form correct expression for $\tan\gamma$ or $\cot\gamma$ in terms of $e_2$ and $\beta$ or $(90-\beta)$. May quote result from (a) or obtain again |
| $\tan\gamma = e_2 \times \dfrac{1}{\tan\beta} = e_2 \times \dfrac{1}{e_1\tan\alpha}$ | M1 | 3.1b – **Use result from (a)** to eliminate $\tan\beta$ and form equation in $\alpha$, $\gamma$, $e_1$, $e_2$ |
| $e_1\tan\alpha = e_2\cot\gamma$ * | A1* | 2.2a – Given answer correctly obtained. Must include replacement of $\tan\beta$ and rearrangement. Accept $e_1\tan\alpha = e_2\cot\gamma$ or $e_2\cot\gamma = e_1\tan\alpha$ |
| **Total** | **(3)** | |
# Question 7(c):
| Answer/Working | Mark | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| $(\text{angle } APQ + \text{angle } AQP) = (180°-\alpha-\beta)+\{180°-(90°-\beta)-\gamma\} = 270°-\alpha-\gamma$. Otherwise: angle $PAQ = \alpha+\gamma-90°$ | M1 | 1.1b – Clear attempt to find angle sum (condone slips) or another relevant starting point e.g. expression for angle $PAQ$ |
| To return to $A$: angle $APQ$ + angle $AQP < 180°$ since $APQ$ is a triangle. Otherwise: angle $PAQ > 0$ | M1 | 3.1b – Clear statement to form inequality e.g. correct angle sum $< 180°$ is acceptable, or angle $PAQ > 0$ |
| $270°-\alpha-\gamma < 180° \Rightarrow \alpha > 90°-\gamma$ | A1 | 1.1b – Correct simplified inequality in correct form |
| $\tan\alpha > \tan(90°-\gamma)$ – correct method using addition formulae | M1 | 1.1b – Correct method to form inequality in tan or cot |
| $\dfrac{e_2\cot\gamma}{e_1} > \cot\gamma$ | M1 | 1.1b – Using part (b) to eliminate the angles |
| $e_2 > e_1$ * | A1* | 2.2a – Given answer correctly obtained |
| **Total** | **(6)** | |
# Question 7(d):
| Answer/Working | Mark | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| From (b), $\alpha = 90°-\gamma$, so it moves parallel to $AP$, e.g. parallel to the initial velocity | B1 | 2.4 |
| **Total** | **(1)** | |
## Question 7:
**Part (c) alt — Use of trig identity**
| Answer/Working | Mark | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| (angle $APQ$ + angle $AQP$) $= (180° - \alpha - \beta) + \{180° - (90° - \beta) - \gamma\} = 270 - \alpha - \gamma$ | M1 | |
| To return to $A$, (angle $APQ$ + angle $AQP$) $< 180°$, since $APQ$ is a triangle | M1 | |
| $\tan(\alpha + \gamma) = \dfrac{\tan\alpha + \tan\gamma}{1 - \tan\alpha\tan\gamma}$ and $\tan\alpha = \dfrac{e_2\cot\gamma}{e_1}$ or $\tan\alpha = \dfrac{e_2}{e_1\tan\gamma}$, leads to $\tan(\alpha+\gamma) = \dfrac{e_2 + e_1\tan^2\gamma}{e_1\tan\gamma - e_2\tan\gamma}$ oe | A1 | |
| $180 > (\alpha+\gamma) > 90 \Rightarrow \tan(\alpha+\gamma) < 0 \Rightarrow \dfrac{e_2 + e_1\tan^2\gamma}{e_1\tan\gamma - e_2\tan\gamma} < 0$ | M1 | Condone if '$180 >$' is not stated again |
| Since numerator $> 0$, therefore $e_1\tan\gamma - e_2\tan\gamma < 0$ | M1 | |
| $e_2 > e_1$ * | A1 | |
**Part (d)**
| Answer/Working | Mark | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| $\alpha = 90° - \gamma$, so it moves parallel to $AP$; or $\alpha = 90° - \gamma$, so it moves parallel to the initial velocity | B1 | Use given information from (b) to make any equivalent statement with a correct reason and no incorrect statements. Do not accept 'it moves parallel to the initial speed' |
7.
\begin{figure}[h]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[alt={},max width=\textwidth]{0da9cd5b-6f6f-4607-bd4f-c8ae164466ae-24_721_1367_280_349}
\captionsetup{labelformat=empty}
\caption{Figure 2}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
A small smooth snooker ball is projected from the corner $A$ of a horizontal rectangular snooker table $A B C D$.
The ball is projected so it first hits the side $D C$ at the point $P$, then hits the side $C B$ at the point $Q$ and then returns to $A$.
Angle $A P D = \alpha$, Angle $Q P C = \beta$, Angle $A Q B = \gamma$\\
The ball moves along $A P$ with speed $U$, along $P Q$ with speed $V$ and along $Q A$ with speed $W$, as shown in Figure 2.
The coefficient of restitution between the ball and side $D C$ is $e _ { 1 }$\\
The coefficient of restitution between the ball and side $C B$ is $e _ { 2 }$\\
The ball is modelled as a particle.
\section*{Use the model to answer all parts of this question.}
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item Show that $\tan \beta = e _ { 1 } \tan \alpha$
\item Hence show that $e _ { 1 } \tan \alpha = e _ { 2 } \cot \gamma$
\item By considering (angle $A P Q$ + angle $A Q P$ ) or otherwise, show that it would be possible for the ball to return to $A$ only if $e _ { 2 } > e _ { 1 }$
If instead $e _ { 1 } = e _ { 2 }$, the ball would not return to $A$.\\
Given that $e _ { 1 } = e _ { 2 }$
\item use the result from part (b) to describe the path of the ball after it hits $C B$ at $Q$, explaining your answer.
\end{enumerate}
\hfill \mbox{\textit{Edexcel FM1 2023 Q7 [14]}}