Edexcel S4 2006 June — Question 2 12 marks

Exam BoardEdexcel
ModuleS4 (Statistics 4)
Year2006
SessionJune
Marks12
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicF-test and chi-squared for variance
TypeF-test two variances hypothesis
DifficultyChallenging +1.2 This is a Further Maths S4 question requiring chi-squared confidence intervals and an F-test for variance comparison. While the topic is advanced (Further Maths), the execution is straightforward: calculate sample variance from raw data, apply standard chi-squared formulas, then perform a routine F-test with clearly defined hypotheses. The calculations are mechanical with no conceptual traps or novel problem-solving required.
Spec5.05c Hypothesis test: normal distribution for population mean

2. The weights, in grams, of apples are assumed to follow a normal distribution. The weights of apples sold by a supermarket have variance \(\sigma _ { s } { } ^ { 2 }\). A random sample of 4 apples from the supermarket had weights $$\text { 114, 100, 119, } 123 .$$
  1. Find a 95\% confidence interval for \(\sigma _ { s } ^ { 2 }\). The weights of apples sold on a market stall have variance \(\sigma _ { M } ^ { 2 }\). A second random sample of 7 apples was taken from the market stall. The sample variance \(s _ { M } ^ { 2 }\) of the apples was 318.8.
  2. Stating your hypotheses clearly test, at the \(1 \%\) levcel of significnace, whether or not there is evidence that \(\sigma _ { M } ^ { 2 } > \sigma _ { s } ^ { 2 }\).

2. The weights, in grams, of apples are assumed to follow a normal distribution.

The weights of apples sold by a supermarket have variance $\sigma _ { s } { } ^ { 2 }$. A random sample of 4 apples from the supermarket had weights

$$\text { 114, 100, 119, } 123 .$$
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item Find a 95\% confidence interval for $\sigma _ { s } ^ { 2 }$.

The weights of apples sold on a market stall have variance $\sigma _ { M } ^ { 2 }$. A second random sample of 7 apples was taken from the market stall. The sample variance $s _ { M } ^ { 2 }$ of the apples was 318.8.
\item Stating your hypotheses clearly test, at the $1 \%$ levcel of significnace, whether or not there is evidence that $\sigma _ { M } ^ { 2 } > \sigma _ { s } ^ { 2 }$.
\end{enumerate}

\hfill \mbox{\textit{Edexcel S4 2006 Q2 [12]}}