Edexcel D1 2014 June — Question 1 9 marks

Exam BoardEdexcel
ModuleD1 (Decision Mathematics 1)
Year2014
SessionJune
Marks9
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicSorting Algorithms
TypeQuick Sort Execution
DifficultyEasy -1.3 This is a straightforward algorithmic execution question requiring mechanical application of quick sort and binary search procedures with no problem-solving or insight needed. Part (a) is routine pivot selection and partitioning, part (b) is direct algorithm application, and part (c) uses the standard formula log₂(n). Well below average difficulty for A-level maths.
Spec7.03k Sorting: quick sort

1. \begin{displayquote} McCANN
SMITH
QUAGLIA
CONGDON
EVES
PATEL
BUSH
FOX
OSBORNE
  1. Use a quick sort to produce a list of these names in alphabetical order. You must make your pivots clear.
  2. Use the binary search algorithm on your list to locate the name PATEL. State the number of iterations you use. \end{displayquote} The binary search algorithm is to be used to search for a name in an alphabetical list of 641 names.
  3. Find the maximum number of iterations needed, justifying your answer.

Question 1:
Part (a)
AnswerMarks Guidance
Answer/WorkingMarks Guidance
Quick sort demonstrated with pivots selected and first pass giving \(p\)M1 Quick sort – pivots selected and first pass gives \(p\). If only choosing one pivot per iteration M1 only.
First pass correct, next two pivots chosen correctly for second passA1 First pass correct, next two pivots chosen correctly for second pass
Second and third passes correct (follow through from first pass and choice of pivots) and next pivot(s) chosen consistently for fourth passA1ft Follow through from their first pass and choice of pivots
CSO and 'sort complete'A1 Could be shown either by a 'stop' statement or final list rewritten or using each item as a pivot
Part (b)
AnswerMarks Guidance
Answer/WorkingMarks Guidance
Pivot \(1 = \left[\frac{1+9}{2}\right] = 5\), McCANN, reject 1–5M1 Choosing middle right pivot (choosing middle left is M0) + discarding/retaining half the list. M1 only for an 'incorrect' list – allow 1 error or 1 omission or 1 extra
Pivot \(2 = \left[\frac{6+9}{2}\right] = 8\), QUAGLIA, reject 8–9A1 First and second passes correct i.e. \(5^{th}\) and \(8^{th}\) items for a correct list and second half rejected (no sticky pivots)
Pivot \(3 = \left[\frac{6+7}{2}\right] = 7\), PATEL. \(P =\) PATEL, name found (so 3 iterations)A1 CSO. Third pass correct i.e. \(7^{th}\) item for a correct list + "found". Accept 'found', 'located', 'stop' etc. but not just the letter. Number of iterations does not need to be stated explicitly
Part (c)
AnswerMarks Guidance
Answer/WorkingMarks Guidance
\(\log_2 641 = 9.324\), so 10, or maximum number of items in each pass: \(641, 320, 160, 80, 40, 20, 10, 5, 2, 1\)M1 For at least \(641, 320, 160, 80, \ldots\) or embedded in calculation e.g. \(\left[\frac{641+1}{2}\right] = 321\), \(\left[\frac{320+1}{2}\right] = 161\), etc.
So 10 iterationsA1 If considering maximum values at end of each iteration: \(320, 160, 80, \ldots, 1\) so 9 iterations is A0
Question 1 (Numerical Arguments - Binary Search/Iterations):
AnswerMarks Guidance
Answer/WorkingMark Guidance
\(2^n > 641\), taking logs: \(n > \log_2 641\)M1 Either take logs of both sides and solve for \(n\), or state \(n = 9.32...\) (accept \(2^n = 641\))
\(n = 9.32...\) (1 dp) hence \(n = 10\)A1 Above with \(n=10\), no errors if calculation seen (allow recovery from equals)
\(\log_2 641 = \cdots = 9.32...\) giving \(n=10\)M1 Alternative: \(\log_2 641\) stated
\(\frac{641}{2^{10}} = \frac{641}{1024} = 0.625...\) shown explicitlyM1, A1 Must show \(n=10\) is first value giving result less than 1; stating \(\frac{641}{1024}\) less than 1 insufficient alone
Answer of 10 with no workingM0
Quick Sort Table (middle left pivot):
AnswerMarks
PassPivots
M S Q C E P B F O EE
C B E M S Q P F OC, Q
B C E M P F O Q S(B), P, (S)
B C E M F O P Q SF
B C E F M O P Q SM
B C E F M O P Q S(O)
Sort complete.
# Question 1:

## Part (a)

| Answer/Working | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Quick sort demonstrated with pivots selected and first pass giving $<p$, $p$, $>p$ | M1 | Quick sort – pivots selected and first pass gives $<p$, $p$, $>p$. **If only choosing one pivot per iteration M1 only.** |
| First pass correct, next two pivots chosen correctly for second pass | A1 | First pass correct, next two pivots chosen correctly for second pass |
| Second and third passes correct (follow through from first pass and choice of pivots) and next pivot(s) chosen consistently for fourth pass | A1ft | Follow through from their first pass and choice of pivots |
| CSO and 'sort complete' | A1 | Could be shown **either** by a 'stop' statement **or** final list rewritten **or** using each item as a pivot |

## Part (b)

| Answer/Working | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Pivot $1 = \left[\frac{1+9}{2}\right] = 5$, McCANN, reject 1–5 | M1 | Choosing middle right pivot (choosing middle left is M0) + discarding/retaining half the list. M1 **only** for an 'incorrect' list – allow 1 error or 1 omission or 1 extra |
| Pivot $2 = \left[\frac{6+9}{2}\right] = 8$, QUAGLIA, reject 8–9 | A1 | First and second passes correct i.e. $5^{th}$ and $8^{th}$ items for a correct list **and** second half rejected (no sticky pivots) |
| Pivot $3 = \left[\frac{6+7}{2}\right] = 7$, PATEL. $P =$ PATEL, name found (so 3 iterations) | A1 | CSO. Third pass correct i.e. $7^{th}$ item for a correct list + "found". Accept 'found', 'located', 'stop' etc. but not just the letter. Number of iterations does **not** need to be stated explicitly |

## Part (c)

| Answer/Working | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| $\log_2 641 = 9.324$, so 10, or maximum number of items in each pass: $641, 320, 160, 80, 40, 20, 10, 5, 2, 1$ | M1 | For at least $641, 320, 160, 80, \ldots$ or embedded in calculation e.g. $\left[\frac{641+1}{2}\right] = 321$, $\left[\frac{320+1}{2}\right] = 161$, etc. |
| So 10 iterations | A1 | If considering maximum values at end of each iteration: $320, 160, 80, \ldots, 1$ so 9 iterations is A0 |

# Question 1 (Numerical Arguments - Binary Search/Iterations):

| Answer/Working | Mark | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| $2^n > 641$, taking logs: $n > \log_2 641$ | M1 | Either take logs of both sides and solve for $n$, or state $n = 9.32...$ (accept $2^n = 641$) |
| $n = 9.32...$ (1 dp) hence $n = 10$ | A1 | Above with $n=10$, no errors if calculation seen (allow recovery from equals) |
| $\log_2 641 = \cdots = 9.32...$ giving $n=10$ | M1 | Alternative: $\log_2 641$ stated |
| $\frac{641}{2^{10}} = \frac{641}{1024} = 0.625...$ shown explicitly | M1, A1 | Must show $n=10$ is first value giving result less than 1; stating $\frac{641}{1024}$ less than 1 insufficient alone |
| Answer of 10 with no working | M0 | — |

**Quick Sort Table (middle left pivot):**

| Pass | Pivots |
|---|---|
| M S Q C **E** P B F O E | E |
| **C** B E M S **Q** P F O | C, Q |
| **B** C E M **P** F O **Q** S | (B), P, (S) |
| B C E M **F** O P Q S | F |
| B C E F **M** O P Q S | M |
| B C E F **M** O P Q S | (O) |

Sort complete.

---
1.

\begin{displayquote}
McCANN\\
SMITH\\
QUAGLIA\\
CONGDON\\
EVES\\
PATEL\\
BUSH\\
FOX\\
OSBORNE
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item Use a quick sort to produce a list of these names in alphabetical order. You must make your pivots clear.
\item Use the binary search algorithm on your list to locate the name PATEL. State the number of iterations you use.
\end{displayquote}

The binary search algorithm is to be used to search for a name in an alphabetical list of 641 names.
\item Find the maximum number of iterations needed, justifying your answer.
\end{enumerate}

\hfill \mbox{\textit{Edexcel D1 2014 Q1 [9]}}