| Exam Board | OCR |
|---|---|
| Module | Further Pure Core 2 (Further Pure Core 2) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Session | June |
| Marks | 7 |
| Paper | Download PDF ↗ |
| Mark scheme | Download PDF ↗ |
| Topic | Hyperbolic functions |
| Type | Solve using double angle formulas |
| Difficulty | Standard +0.3 This is a structured multi-part question on hyperbolic functions that guides students through standard techniques. Part (a) is a routine proof from definitions, part (b) requires simple algebraic manipulation of the hyperbolic identity, and part (c) involves solving a quadratic-type equation. While it requires knowledge of Further Maths content, the question provides scaffolding and uses standard methods without requiring novel insight. |
| Spec | 4.07a Hyperbolic definitions: sinh, cosh, tanh as exponentials4.07c Hyperbolic identity: cosh^2(x) - sinh^2(x) = 1 |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | (a) | RHS=cosh2 x+sinh2 x |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| = cosh 2x = LHS | M1 |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| [2] | 2.1 |
| 1.1 | Using definitions of cosh x and |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| (b) | cosh2x + sinh2x = cosh2x & cosh2x – sinh2x = 1 |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| => cosh 2x = 2cosh2 x – 1 | B1 |
| [1] | 2.2a |
| (c) | 10cosh2 x – 5 = 16cosh x + 21 |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| x=ln5 | M1 |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| A1 | 1.1 |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| 2.2a | Using the identity from (b) to |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| both solutions. | Could be BC |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| 5 e 4 x − 1 6 e 3 x − 4 2 e 2 x − 1 6 e x + 5 = 0 | Alternative method: | M1 |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| 5 e 4 x − 1 6 e 3 x − 4 2 e 2 x − 1 6 e x + 5 = 0 | Using the exponential definition |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| M1 | equation to a quartic equation in |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | M1 | Factorising or using quartic |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| e = –1 => ex = –1 which is not possible since | A1 | Negative solution must be |
| ex > 0 for all (real) x. | rejected and a valid reason given. | |
| So ex = 5 or 1/5 => x = ln5 or ln(1/5) | So ex = 5 or 1/5 => x = ln5 or ln(1/5) | A1 |
Question 5:
5 | (a) | RHS=cosh2 x+sinh2 x
ex+e−x 2 ex−e−x 2
= +
2 2
= 1 ( e 2 x + e − 2 x + 2 + e 2 x + e − 2 x − 2 )
4
= 1 ( 2 e 2 x + 2 e − 2 x ) = 1 ( e 2 x + e − 2 x )
4 2
= cosh 2x = LHS | M1
A1
[2] | 2.1
1.1 | Using definitions of cosh x and
sinh x.
AG. Intermediate working must
be seen.
(b) | cosh2x + sinh2x = cosh2x & cosh2x – sinh2x = 1
=> 2cosh2 x = cosh 2x + 1
=> cosh 2x = 2cosh2 x – 1 | B1
[1] | 2.2a
(c) | 10cosh2 x – 5 = 16cosh x + 21
=> 10c2 – 16c – 26 = 0 => 5c2 – 8c – 13 = 0
c = –1 rejected since cosh x ≥ 1 (or ≥ 0 oe)
or c = 13/5
2
1 3 1 3 1 3
c o s h − 1 = ln + − 1 = ln 5
5 5 5
x=ln5 | M1
A1
M1
A1 | 1.1
2.3
1.1
2.2a | Using the identity from (b) to
reduce equation to 3 term
quadratic
Both solutions found…
… and –1 rejected explicitly with
valid reason. E.g “–1 is outside
the range of cosh x”
Use of formula for cosh–1 (or by
solving quadratic in ex).
x = ln5 or ln(1/5). Must have
both solutions. | Could be BC
Alternative method:
5 ( e 2 x + e − 2 x ) = 8 ( e x + e − x ) + 2 1
2
5 e 4 x − 1 6 e 3 x − 4 2 e 2 x − 1 6 e x + 5 = 0 | Alternative method: | M1
5 ( e 2 x + e − 2 x ) = 8 ( e x + e − x ) + 2 1
2
5 e 4 x − 1 6 e 3 x − 4 2 e 2 x − 1 6 e x + 5 = 0 | Using the exponential definition
of cosh to reduce the given
M1 | equation to a quartic equation in
ex.
ex =e
5e3(e−5)+9e2(e−5)+3e(e−5)−(e−5)=0
(e−5)(5e3+9e2 +3e−1)=0
(e−5)(e2(5e−1)+2e(5e−1)+(5e−1))=0
(e−5)(5e−1)(e2 +2e+1)=0
(e−5)(5e−1)(e+1)2 =0
1
e=−1, or 5
5 | M1 | Factorising or using quartic
solver.
Factorising or using quartic
solver.
e = –1 => ex = –1 which is not possible since | A1 | Negative solution must be
ex > 0 for all (real) x. | rejected and a valid reason given.
So ex = 5 or 1/5 => x = ln5 or ln(1/5) | So ex = 5 or 1/5 => x = ln5 or ln(1/5) | A1 | x = ln5. Must have both
solutions.
[4]
M1
5
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item By using the exponential definitions of $\sinh x$ and $\cosh x$, prove the identity $\cosh 2 x \equiv \cosh ^ { 2 } x + \sinh ^ { 2 } x$.
\item Hence find an expression for $\cosh 2 x$ in terms of $\cosh x$.
\item Determine the solutions of the equation $5 \cosh 2 x = 16 \cosh x + 21$, giving your answers in exact logarithmic form.
\end{enumerate}
\hfill \mbox{\textit{OCR Further Pure Core 2 2022 Q5 [7]}}