OCR Further Statistics AS 2021 November — Question 2 7 marks

Exam BoardOCR
ModuleFurther Statistics AS (Further Statistics AS)
Year2021
SessionNovember
Marks7
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicHypothesis test of Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient
TypeOne-tailed test for positive correlation
DifficultyStandard +0.3 This is a straightforward application of the Pearson's correlation coefficient hypothesis test with all summary statistics provided. Students must calculate r using the standard formula, state hypotheses for a one-tailed test, and compare with critical values from tables. While it's a Further Maths topic (making it slightly above average), the question requires only direct substitution into a formula and table lookup with no conceptual complications or multi-step reasoning.
Spec5.08a Pearson correlation: calculate pmcc5.08d Hypothesis test: Pearson correlation

2 A shopper estimates the cost, \(\pounds X\) per item, of each of 12 items in a supermarket. The shopper's estimates are compared with the actual cost, \(\pounds Y\) per item, of each item. The results are summarised as follows. \(n = 12\) \(\sum x = 399\) \(\sum y = 623.88\) \(\sum x ^ { 2 } = 28127\) \(\sum y ^ { 2 } = 116509.0212\) \(\sum x y = 45006.01\) Test at the 1\% significance level whether the shopper's estimates are positively correlated with the actual cost of the items.

Question 2:
AnswerMarks Guidance
\(r = 0.686(41)\)M1 Evidence for correct method (e.g. correct value)
A1Correct value
\(H_0: \rho = 0,\ H_1: \rho > 0\)B1 B1 if one error or if \(\rho\) not defined as population parameter
where \(\rho\) is the population correlation coefficientB1
\(r_\text{crit} = 0.6581\)B1 Seen. Allow 0.658
Reject \(H_0\). There is significant evidence of positive correlation between the taster's estimates and the actual price.M1ft Correct first conclusion
A1ftContextualised, not too definite. FT on their \(r\) but not their CV
[7]
## Question 2:

$r = 0.686(41)$ | **M1** | Evidence for correct method (e.g. correct value)
| **A1** | Correct value

$H_0: \rho = 0,\ H_1: \rho > 0$ | **B1** | B1 if one error or if $\rho$ not defined as population parameter
where $\rho$ is the population correlation coefficient | **B1** |

$r_\text{crit} = 0.6581$ | **B1** | Seen. Allow 0.658

Reject $H_0$. There is significant evidence of positive correlation between the taster's estimates and the actual price. | **M1ft** | Correct first conclusion
| **A1ft** | Contextualised, not too definite. FT on their $r$ but not their CV
[7]

---
2 A shopper estimates the cost, $\pounds X$ per item, of each of 12 items in a supermarket. The shopper's estimates are compared with the actual cost, $\pounds Y$ per item, of each item. The results are summarised as follows.\\
$n = 12$\\
$\sum x = 399$\\
$\sum y = 623.88$\\
$\sum x ^ { 2 } = 28127$\\
$\sum y ^ { 2 } = 116509.0212$\\
$\sum x y = 45006.01$\\
Test at the 1\% significance level whether the shopper's estimates are positively correlated with the actual cost of the items.

\hfill \mbox{\textit{OCR Further Statistics AS 2021 Q2 [7]}}