OCR Further Statistics AS 2020 November — Question 1 5 marks

Exam BoardOCR
ModuleFurther Statistics AS (Further Statistics AS)
Year2020
SessionNovember
Marks5
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicBivariate data
TypeCalculate r from raw bivariate data
DifficultyModerate -0.3 This is a straightforward calculation of Pearson's correlation coefficient from a small dataset (5 points), followed by interpretation and understanding of linear transformations. Part (a) is routine computation using the standard formula, part (b) tests basic interpretation, and part (c) tests understanding that linear transformations preserve correlation. While it requires careful arithmetic and knowledge of correlation properties, it's a standard textbook exercise with no novel problem-solving required, making it slightly easier than average.
Spec5.08a Pearson correlation: calculate pmcc

1 Five observations of bivariate data \(( x , y )\) are given in the table.
\(x\)781264
\(y\)201671723
  1. Find the value of Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient.
  2. State what your answer to part (a) tells you about a scatter diagram representing the data.
  3. A new variable \(a\) is defined by \(\mathrm { a } = 3 \mathrm { x } + 4\). Dee says "The value of Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient between \(a\) and \(y\) will not be the same as the answer to part (a)." State with a reason whether you agree with Dee.

Question 1:
Part (a)
AnswerMarks Guidance
\(-0.954\)B2 [2] SC: If B0, give B1 if two of \(7.04, 29.0[4], -13.6[4]\) (or \(35.2, 145[.2], -68.2\)) seen
Part (b)
AnswerMarks Guidance
Points lie close to a straight lineB1 Must refer to line, not just "negative correlation"
Line has negative gradientB1 [2]
Part (c)
AnswerMarks Guidance
No, it will be the same as \(x \to a\) is a linear transformationB1 [1] OE. *Either* "same" with correct reason, *or* "disagree" with correct reason. Allow any clear valid technical term
# Question 1:

## Part (a)
$-0.954$ | **B2** [2] | SC: If B0, give B1 if two of $7.04, 29.0[4], -13.6[4]$ (or $35.2, 145[.2], -68.2$) seen

## Part (b)
Points lie close to a straight line | **B1** | Must refer to line, not just "negative correlation"
Line has negative gradient | **B1** [2] |

## Part (c)
No, it will be the same as $x \to a$ is a linear transformation | **B1** [1] | OE. *Either* "same" with correct reason, *or* "disagree" with correct reason. Allow any clear valid technical term

---
1 Five observations of bivariate data $( x , y )$ are given in the table.

\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{ | c | c | c | c | c | c | }
\hline
$x$ & 7 & 8 & 12 & 6 & 4 \\
\hline
$y$ & 20 & 16 & 7 & 17 & 23 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item Find the value of Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient.
\item State what your answer to part (a) tells you about a scatter diagram representing the data.
\item A new variable $a$ is defined by $\mathrm { a } = 3 \mathrm { x } + 4$. Dee says "The value of Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient between $a$ and $y$ will not be the same as the answer to part (a)."

State with a reason whether you agree with Dee.
\end{enumerate}

\hfill \mbox{\textit{OCR Further Statistics AS 2020 Q1 [5]}}