Edexcel AS Paper 2 2022 June — Question 1 5 marks

Exam BoardEdexcel
ModuleAS Paper 2 (AS Paper 2)
Year2022
SessionJune
Marks5
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicLinear regression
TypeInterpret regression line parameters
DifficultyEasy -1.2 This is a straightforward interpretation question requiring only basic understanding of regression line parameters: recognizing negative correlation from a negative gradient, stating units (cm/day), simple arithmetic (3 × -1.1), and commenting on extrapolation. All parts are direct recall or one-step calculations with no problem-solving required.
Spec2.02c Scatter diagrams and regression lines5.09a Dependent/independent variables

  1. The relationship between two variables \(p\) and \(t\) is modelled by the regression line with equation
$$p = 22 - 1.1 t$$ The model is based on observations of the independent variable, \(t\), between 1 and 10
  1. Describe the correlation between \(p\) and \(t\) implied by this model. Given that \(p\) is measured in centimetres and \(t\) is measured in days,
  2. state the units of the gradient of the regression line. Using the model,
  3. calculate the change in \(p\) over a 3-day period. Tisam uses this model to estimate the value of \(p\) when \(t = 19\)
  4. Comment, giving a reason, on the reliability of this estimate.

AnswerMarks Guidance
1(a) Negative (since gradient of regression line is negative)B1 AO 1.2
1(b) cm/day (o.e. e.g. cm day\(^{-1}\))B1 AO 2.2a
1(c) \(3x[\pm]1.1 = \text{decrease of } 3.3 \text{ [cm]}\)M1, A1 AO 3.4, 1.1b
1(d) 19 is (well) outside the range [1, 10] or involves extrapolation (o.e.) so (possibly) unreliable/inaccurate (o.e.)B1 AO 2.4
Total: 5 marks
**1(a)** Negative (since gradient of regression line is negative) | B1 | AO 1.2

**1(b)** cm/day (o.e. e.g. cm day$^{-1}$) | B1 | AO 2.2a

**1(c)** $3x[\pm]1.1 = \text{decrease of } 3.3 \text{ [cm]}$ | M1, A1 | AO 3.4, 1.1b | Answers may be written within the question. B1 for stating "negative". Allow a correct interpretation e.g. as $t$ increases then $p$ decreases (o.e.) [ignore any values]. B0 for contradictory statements e.g. "negative correlation since as $t$ increases $p$ increases". M1 for attempt at a calculation (allow use of $t = x$ and $t = x + 3$ followed by subtraction that should lead to 3.3). A1 for correct description must include word "decrease" (o.e.) and value "3.3". Just seeing: $22 - 1.1 \times 3 = 18.7$ is M0A0 BUT going on to subtract 18.7 from 22 scores M1. Reaching 3.3 and stating "decrease" or "reduced" (o.e.) will score A1 too. An answer of $-3.3$ without a word describing decrease (o.e.), will just score M1A0.

**1(d)** 19 is (well) outside the range [1, 10] or involves extrapolation (o.e.) so (possibly) unreliable/inaccurate (o.e.) | B1 | AO 2.4 | B1 for stating "unreliable" (o.e.) **and** giving a suitable reason based on idea of extrapolation. Must have both statement about reliability and suitable reason e.g. $t = 19$ is too big or (Model is based on) $t$ between 1 and 10 (only) [since this is $t = 19$ is too big]. Allow e.g. (model) "may not work" because of "extrapolation". Just saying "no" since "extrapolation" is B0 but "unreliable"(o.e.) since "extrapolation" is B1.

**Total: 5 marks**

---
\begin{enumerate}
  \item The relationship between two variables $p$ and $t$ is modelled by the regression line with equation
\end{enumerate}

$$p = 22 - 1.1 t$$

The model is based on observations of the independent variable, $t$, between 1 and 10\\
(a) Describe the correlation between $p$ and $t$ implied by this model.

Given that $p$ is measured in centimetres and $t$ is measured in days,\\
(b) state the units of the gradient of the regression line.

Using the model,\\
(c) calculate the change in $p$ over a 3-day period.

Tisam uses this model to estimate the value of $p$ when $t = 19$\\
(d) Comment, giving a reason, on the reliability of this estimate.

\hfill \mbox{\textit{Edexcel AS Paper 2 2022 Q1 [5]}}