OCR S3 2010 January — Question 6 12 marks

Exam BoardOCR
ModuleS3 (Statistics 3)
Year2010
SessionJanuary
Marks12
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicWilcoxon tests
TypePaired t-test
DifficultyStandard +0.3 This is a straightforward paired t-test application with clear data and standard procedures. Students must calculate differences, perform a one-tailed test against a specific value (not just zero), and construct a confidence interval. While requiring careful attention to the hypothesis (decrease > 0.2 rather than simply ≠ 0), the mechanics are routine S3 material with no conceptual surprises or complex interpretation needed.
Spec5.05c Hypothesis test: normal distribution for population mean5.05d Confidence intervals: using normal distribution

6 The deterioration of a certain drug over time was investigated as follows. The drug strength was measured in each of a random sample of 8 bottles containing the drug. These were stored for two years and the strengths were then re-measured. The original and final strengths, in suitable units, are shown in the following table.
Bottle12345678
Original strength8.79.49.28.99.68.29.98.8
Final strength8.19.09.08.89.38.09.58.5
  1. Stating any required assumption, test at the \(5 \%\) significance level whether the mean strength has decreased by more than 0.2 over the two years.
  2. Calculate a 95\% confidence interval for the mean reduction in strength over the two years.

6(i)
Assumes that decreases have a normal distribution
\(H_0: \mu_D = 0.2\) (or \(\equiv 2\)), \(H_1: \mu_D > 0.2\)
O-F: 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3
\(\bar{D} = 0.3125\), \(s^2 = 0.024107\)
\(\frac{(0.3125 - 0.2)\sqrt{0.024107/8}}{= 2.049}\)
\(> 1.895\)
Reject \(H_0\) – there is sufficient evidence at the 5% significance level that the reduction is more than 0.2
AnswerMarks
B1For both hypotheses
B1, M1B1 Use paired differences t-test
B1, A1, M1, A1Must have /8
M1, A1OR: \(P(t \geq 2.049) = 0.0398 < 0.05\)
Allow M1 from \(t_{0.4} = 1.761\)
SR: 2-sample test:B1B1M0B1A0
M1 using 1.761 A1 Max 4/9
Total: 9
6(ii)
\(0.3125 \pm t \sqrt{0.024107/8}\)
\(t = 2.365\)
\((0.1827, 0.4423)\)
AnswerMarks
M1Allow with \(z\) but with /8
B1Rounding to \((0.283, 0.442)\)
A1
Total: [12]
## 6(i)

Assumes that decreases have a normal distribution

$H_0: \mu_D = 0.2$ (or $\equiv 2$), $H_1: \mu_D > 0.2$

O-F: 0.6  0.4  0.2  0.1  0.3  0.2  0.4  0.3

$\bar{D} = 0.3125$, $s^2 = 0.024107$

$\frac{(0.3125 - 0.2)\sqrt{0.024107/8}}{= 2.049}$

$> 1.895$

Reject $H_0$ – there is sufficient evidence at the 5% significance level that the reduction is more than 0.2

| B1 | For both hypotheses |
| --- | --- |
| B1, M1 | B1 Use paired differences t-test |
| B1, A1, M1, A1 | Must have /8 |
| M1, A1 | OR: $P(t \geq 2.049) = 0.0398 < 0.05$ |
| | | Allow M1 from $t_{0.4} = 1.761$ |
| | | SR: 2-sample test:B1B1M0B1A0 |
| | | M1 using 1.761 A1 Max 4/9 |

**Total: 9**

## 6(ii)

$0.3125 \pm t \sqrt{0.024107/8}$

$t = 2.365$

$(0.1827, 0.4423)$

| M1 | Allow with $z$ but with /8 |
| --- | --- |
| B1 | Rounding to $(0.283, 0.442)$ |
| A1 | |

**Total: [12]**

---
6 The deterioration of a certain drug over time was investigated as follows. The drug strength was measured in each of a random sample of 8 bottles containing the drug. These were stored for two years and the strengths were then re-measured. The original and final strengths, in suitable units, are shown in the following table.

\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{ | l | c | c | c | c | c | c | c | c | }
\hline
Bottle & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 \\
\hline
Original strength & 8.7 & 9.4 & 9.2 & 8.9 & 9.6 & 8.2 & 9.9 & 8.8 \\
\hline
Final strength & 8.1 & 9.0 & 9.0 & 8.8 & 9.3 & 8.0 & 9.5 & 8.5 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}

(i) Stating any required assumption, test at the $5 \%$ significance level whether the mean strength has decreased by more than 0.2 over the two years.\\
(ii) Calculate a 95\% confidence interval for the mean reduction in strength over the two years.

\hfill \mbox{\textit{OCR S3 2010 Q6 [12]}}