| Exam Board | OCR |
|---|---|
| Module | FP2 (Further Pure Mathematics 2) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Session | June |
| Marks | 12 |
| Paper | Download PDF ↗ |
| Mark scheme | Download PDF ↗ |
| Topic | Reduction Formulae |
| Type | Prove formula by induction |
| Difficulty | Challenging +1.8 This is a challenging Further Maths question requiring derivation of a reduction formula using integration by parts, numerical calculation through recursive application, and a non-trivial induction proof about rationality. While the techniques are standard for FP2, the induction on rationality requires careful algebraic reasoning and is more sophisticated than typical A-level proofs. |
| Spec | 1.08i Integration by parts4.01a Mathematical induction: construct proofs8.06a Reduction formulae: establish, use, and evaluate recursively |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer | Mark | Guidance |
| \(u = \sec^{n-2}x\), \(dv = \sec^2 x\,dx\); \(du = (n-2)\sec^{n-3}x\cdot\sec x\tan x\,dx\), \(v = \tan x\) | M1 | Attempt at integration by parts with correct \(u\) and \(v'\) |
| \(I_n = \left[\sec^{n-2}x\tan x\right]_0^{\pi/4} - \int_0^{\pi/4}(n-2)\sec^{n-3}x\cdot\sec x\tan x\cdot\tan x\,dx\) | A1 | "\(uv\)" term must be seen |
| \(= (\sqrt{2})^{n-2} - (n-2)\int_0^{\pi/4}\sec^{n-2}x\cdot\tan^2 x\,dx\) | A1 | Evaluating the first term |
| \(= (\sqrt{2})^{n-2} - (n-2)\int_0^{\pi/4}\sec^{n-2}x(\sec^2 x - 1)\,dx\) | M1 | Dep on 1st M. Splitting integral using \(\tan^2 x = \sec^2 x - 1\) |
| \(= (\sqrt{2})^{n-2} - (n-2)(I_n - I_{n-2}) \Rightarrow (n-1)I_n = (\sqrt{2})^{n-2} + (n-2)I_{n-2}\) | A1 | [5] |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer | Mark | Guidance |
| \(I_8 = \frac{1}{7}(2^3 + 6I_6) = \frac{1}{7}\left(2^3 + 6\cdot\frac{1}{5}(2^2+4I_4)\right)\) | B1 | Correct statement of formula seen anywhere |
| \(= \frac{1}{7}\left(2^3 + \frac{6}{5}\left(2^2 + 4\cdot\frac{1}{3}(2+2I_2)\right)\right) = \frac{1}{7}\left(8 + \frac{6}{5}\cdot\frac{28}{3}\right)\) | B1 | Substitution of \(I_2\) seen |
| \(= \frac{1}{7}\cdot\frac{96}{5} = \frac{96}{35}\) | B1 | Conclusion. [3] |
| Alternative: \(I_2=1\), \(I_4=\frac{4}{3}\), \(I_6=\frac{28}{15}\), \(I_8=\frac{96}{35}\) | B1 for \(I_2\); B1 for \(I_4\) and \(I_6\); B1 |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer | Mark | Guidance |
| \(I_2 = 1\) (which is rational); therefore \(I_{2n}\) is rational for \(n=1\) | B1 | Allow \(n=2\) |
| Let \(I_{2k}\) be rational for some value of \(k\). Then \(I_{2(k+1)} = \frac{1}{(2k+1)}\left(\sqrt{2}^{2k} + 2kI_{2k}\right) = \frac{1}{(2k+1)}\left(2^k + 2kI_{2k}\right)\) | M1 | For statement plus reduction formula and begin to look at \(\sqrt{2}\) term; assume true for \(n=k\) |
| Statement that this is rational; \(\sqrt{2}^{2k} = 2^k\) is rational | A1 | Reduction formula must be correct |
| So if \(I_{2k}\) is rational then \(I_{2(k+1)}\) is rational. But \(I_2\) is rational so \(I_{2k}\) is rational for all \(n=k\) | A1 | [4] |
## Question 8:
### Part (i):
| Answer | Mark | Guidance |
|--------|------|----------|
| $u = \sec^{n-2}x$, $dv = \sec^2 x\,dx$; $du = (n-2)\sec^{n-3}x\cdot\sec x\tan x\,dx$, $v = \tan x$ | M1 | Attempt at integration by parts with correct $u$ and $v'$ |
| $I_n = \left[\sec^{n-2}x\tan x\right]_0^{\pi/4} - \int_0^{\pi/4}(n-2)\sec^{n-3}x\cdot\sec x\tan x\cdot\tan x\,dx$ | A1 | "$uv$" term must be seen |
| $= (\sqrt{2})^{n-2} - (n-2)\int_0^{\pi/4}\sec^{n-2}x\cdot\tan^2 x\,dx$ | A1 | Evaluating the first term |
| $= (\sqrt{2})^{n-2} - (n-2)\int_0^{\pi/4}\sec^{n-2}x(\sec^2 x - 1)\,dx$ | M1 | Dep on 1st M. Splitting integral using $\tan^2 x = \sec^2 x - 1$ |
| $= (\sqrt{2})^{n-2} - (n-2)(I_n - I_{n-2}) \Rightarrow (n-1)I_n = (\sqrt{2})^{n-2} + (n-2)I_{n-2}$ | A1 | [5] |
### Part (ii):
| Answer | Mark | Guidance |
|--------|------|----------|
| $I_8 = \frac{1}{7}(2^3 + 6I_6) = \frac{1}{7}\left(2^3 + 6\cdot\frac{1}{5}(2^2+4I_4)\right)$ | B1 | Correct statement of formula seen anywhere |
| $= \frac{1}{7}\left(2^3 + \frac{6}{5}\left(2^2 + 4\cdot\frac{1}{3}(2+2I_2)\right)\right) = \frac{1}{7}\left(8 + \frac{6}{5}\cdot\frac{28}{3}\right)$ | B1 | Substitution of $I_2$ seen |
| $= \frac{1}{7}\cdot\frac{96}{5} = \frac{96}{35}$ | B1 | Conclusion. [3] |
| Alternative: $I_2=1$, $I_4=\frac{4}{3}$, $I_6=\frac{28}{15}$, $I_8=\frac{96}{35}$ | | B1 for $I_2$; B1 for $I_4$ and $I_6$; B1 |
### Part (iii):
| Answer | Mark | Guidance |
|--------|------|----------|
| $I_2 = 1$ (which is rational); therefore $I_{2n}$ is rational for $n=1$ | B1 | Allow $n=2$ |
| Let $I_{2k}$ be rational for some value of $k$. Then $I_{2(k+1)} = \frac{1}{(2k+1)}\left(\sqrt{2}^{2k} + 2kI_{2k}\right) = \frac{1}{(2k+1)}\left(2^k + 2kI_{2k}\right)$ | M1 | For statement plus reduction formula and begin to look at $\sqrt{2}$ term; assume true for $n=k$ |
| Statement that this is rational; $\sqrt{2}^{2k} = 2^k$ is rational | A1 | Reduction formula must be correct |
| So if $I_{2k}$ is rational then $I_{2(k+1)}$ is rational. But $I_2$ is rational so $I_{2k}$ is rational for all $n=k$ | A1 | [4] |
The image you've shared appears to be only the **back/contact page** of an OCR mark scheme document — it contains only OCR's contact information, registration details, and quality assurance logos.
**There is no mark scheme content visible in this image.**
To get the actual mark scheme content, you would need to share the pages containing the question-by-question marking guidance (typically the interior pages of the document).
Could you share the correct pages? I'd be happy to extract and format the mark scheme content once those pages are provided.
8 It is given that $I _ { n } = \int _ { 0 } ^ { \frac { 1 } { 4 } \pi } \sec ^ { n } x \mathrm {~d} x$ where $n$ is a positive integer.\\
(i) By writing $\sec ^ { n } x = \sec ^ { n - 2 } x \sec ^ { 2 } x$, or otherwise, show that
$$( n - 1 ) I _ { n } = ( \sqrt { 2 } ) ^ { n - 2 } + ( n - 2 ) I _ { n - 2 } \text { for } n > 1 .$$
(ii) Show that $I _ { 8 } = \frac { 96 } { 35 }$.\\
(iii) Prove by induction that $I _ { 2 n }$ is rational for all values of $n > 1$.
\section*{END OF QUESTION PAPER}
\hfill \mbox{\textit{OCR FP2 2016 Q8 [12]}}