Critique single model appropriateness

A question is this type if and only if it requires evaluating whether a single given exponential model is appropriate, realistic, or consistent with data, real-world constraints, or theoretical expectations, without comparing to alternative models.

5 questions · Moderate -0.2

Sort by: Default | Easiest first | Hardest first
Edexcel Paper 1 2019 June Q7
7 marks Moderate -0.3
  1. In a simple model, the value, \(\pounds V\), of a car depends on its age, \(t\), in years.
The following information is available for \(\operatorname { car } A\)
  • its value when new is \(\pounds 20000\)
  • its value after one year is \(\pounds 16000\)
    1. Use an exponential model to form, for car \(A\), a possible equation linking \(V\) with \(t\).
The value of car \(A\) is monitored over a 10-year period.
Its value after 10 years is \(\pounds 2000\)
  • Evaluate the reliability of your model in light of this information. The following information is available for car \(B\)
    • it has the same value, when new, as car \(A\)
    • its value depreciates more slowly than that of \(\operatorname { car } A\)
    • Explain how you would adapt the equation found in (a) so that it could be used to model the value of car \(B\).
  • OCR MEI AS Paper 2 Specimen Q8
    7 marks Moderate -0.8
    8 In an experiment, the temperature of a hot liquid is measured every minute.
    The difference between the temperature of the hot liquid and room temperature is \(D ^ { \circ } \mathrm { C }\) at time \(t\) minutes. Fig. 8 shows the experimental data. \begin{figure}[h]
    \includegraphics[alt={},max width=\textwidth]{05376a51-e768-4b45-9c18-c98255a4bd70-07_1144_1541_497_276} \captionsetup{labelformat=empty} \caption{Fig. 8}
    \end{figure} It is thought that the model \(D = 70 \mathrm { e } ^ { - 0.03 t }\) might fit the data.
    1. Write down the derivative of \(\mathrm { e } ^ { - 0.03 t }\).
    2. Explain how you know that \(70 \mathrm { e } ^ { - 0.03 t }\) is a decreasing function of \(t\).
    3. Calculate the value of \(70 \mathrm { e } ^ { - 0.03 t }\) when
      1. \(\quad t = 0\),
      2. \(t = 20\).
    4. Using your answers to parts (b) and (c), discuss how well the model \(D = 70 \mathrm { e } ^ { - 0.03 t }\) fits the data.
    OCR MEI Paper 2 2018 June Q16
    11 marks Standard +0.3
    16 In the first year of a course, an A-level student, Aaishah, has a mathematics test each week. The night before each test she revises for \(t\) hours. Over the course of the year she realises that her percentage mark for a test, \(p\), may be modelled by the following formula, where \(A , B\) and \(C\) are constants. $$p = A - B ( t - C ) ^ { 2 }$$
    • Aaishah finds that, however much she revises, her maximum mark is achieved when she does 2 hours revision. This maximum mark is 62 .
    • Aaishah had a mark of 22 when she didn't spend any time revising.
      1. Find the values of \(A , B\) and \(C\).
      2. According to the model, if Aaishah revises for 45 minutes on the night before the test, what mark will she achieve?
      3. What is the maximum amount of time that Aaishah could have spent revising for the model to work?
    In an attempt to improve her marks Aaishah now works through problems for a total of \(t\) hours over the three nights before the test. After taking a number of tests, she proposes the following new formula for \(p\). $$p = 22 + 68 \left( 1 - \mathrm { e } ^ { - 0.8 t } \right)$$ For the next three tests she recorded the data in Fig. 16. \begin{table}[h]
    \(t\)135
    \(p\)598489
    \captionsetup{labelformat=empty} \caption{Fig. 16}
    \end{table}
  • Verify that the data is consistent with the new formula.
  • Aaishah's tutor advises her to spend a minimum of twelve hours working through problems in future. Determine whether or not this is good advice.
  • OCR MEI Paper 3 2023 June Q9
    8 marks Moderate -0.3
    9 A small country started using solar panels to produce electrical energy in the year 2000. Electricity production is measured in megawatt hours (MWh). For the period from 2000 to 2009, the annual electrical energy produced using solar panels can be modelled by the equation \(\mathrm { P } = 0.3 \mathrm { e } ^ { 0.5 \mathrm { t } }\), where \(P\) is the annual amount of electricity produced in MWh and \(t\) is the time in years after the year 2000.
    1. According to this model, find the amount of electricity produced using solar panels in each of the following years.
      1. 2000
      2. 2009
    2. Give a reason why the model is unlikely to be suitable for predicting the annual amount of electricity produced using solar panels in the year 2025. An alternative model is suggested; the curve representing this model is shown in Fig. 9. \begin{figure}[h]
      \captionsetup{labelformat=empty} \caption{Fig. 9} \includegraphics[alt={},max width=\textwidth]{20639e13-01cc-4d96-b694-fb3cf1828f4d-08_702_1587_1265_230}
      \end{figure}
    3. Explain how the graph shows that the alternative model gives a value for the amount of electricity produced in 2009 that is consistent with the original model.
      1. On the axes given in the Printed Answer Booklet, sketch the gradient function of the model shown in Fig. 9.
      2. State approximately the value of \(t\) at the point of inflection in Fig. 9.
      3. Interpret the significance of the point of inflection in the context of the model.
    4. State approximately the long term value of the annual amount of electricity produced using solar panels according to the model represented in Fig. 9.
    OCR H240/01 2018 September Q9
    8 marks Standard +0.3
    9 An analyst believes that the sales of a particular electronic device are growing exponentially. In 2015 the sales were 3.1 million devices and the rate of increase in the annual sales is 0.8 million devices per year.
    1. Find a model to represent the annual sales, defining any variables used.
    2. In 2017 the sales were 5.2 million devices. Determine whether this is consistent with the model in part (i).
    3. The analyst uses the model in part (i) to predict the sales for 2025. Comment on the reliability of this prediction.