Identify faulty reasoning

A question is this type if and only if it presents an incorrect first principles argument and asks students to identify the error and provide a correct version.

2 questions · Moderate -0.7

Sort by: Default | Easiest first | Hardest first
OCR MEI AS Paper 1 2022 June Q12
6 marks Moderate -0.5
12 Below is a faulty argument that appears to show that the gradient of the curve \(y = x ^ { 2 }\) at the point \(( 3,9 )\) is 1 . Consider the chord joining \(( 3,9 )\) to the point \(\left( 3 + h , ( 3 + h ) ^ { 2 } \right)\) The gradient is \(\frac { ( 3 + h ) ^ { 2 } - 9 } { h } = \frac { 6 h + h ^ { 2 } } { h }\) When \(h = 0\) the gradient is \(\frac { 0 } { 0 }\) so the gradient of the curve is 1
  1. Identify a fault in the argument.
  2. Write a valid first principles argument leading to the correct value for the gradient at (3, 9).
  3. Find the equation of the normal to the curve at the point ( 3,9 ).
AQA Paper 1 2019 June Q11
4 marks Moderate -0.8
Jodie is attempting to use differentiation from first principles to prove that the gradient of \(y = \sin x\) is zero when \(x = \frac{\pi}{2}\) Jodie's teacher tells her that she has made mistakes starting in Step 4 of her working. Her working is shown below. \includegraphics{figure_11} Complete Steps 4 and 5 of Jodie's working below, to correct her proof. [4 marks] Step 4 \quad For gradient of curve at A, Step 5 \quad Hence the gradient of the curve at A is given by