| Exam Board | CAIE |
|---|---|
| Module | FP2 (Further Pure Mathematics 2) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Session | November |
| Paper | Download PDF ↗ |
| Mark scheme | Download PDF ↗ |
| Topic | Data representation |
| Type | Draw back-to-back stem-and-leaf diagram |
| Difficulty | Easy -2.0 Drawing a back-to-back stem-and-leaf diagram is a routine data representation task requiring only basic organizational skills and understanding of place value. This is a standard GCSE/AS-level statistics exercise with no problem-solving or mathematical reasoning required beyond following a mechanical procedure. |
| Spec | 2.03a Mutually exclusive and independent events2.03b Probability diagrams: tree, Venn, sample space2.03c Conditional probability: using diagrams/tables |
| \(A\) | \(B\) | \(C\) | |
| Male | 32 | 36 | 12 |
| Female | 18 | 30 | 12 |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer/Working | Marks | Guidance |
| \(H_0\): No difference in preferences [or independent] | B1 | State (at least) null hypothesis |
| \(28.57 \quad 37.71 \quad 13.71\) | Find expected values (to 1 d.p.) | |
| \(21.43 \quad 28.29 \quad 10.29\) | M1 A1 | (lose A1 if rounded to integers) |
| \(\chi^2 = 0.411 + 0.078 + 0.214 + 0.549 + 0.104 + 0.286 = 1.64\) (or \(1.61\) if 1 d.p. used) | M1 A1 | Calculate value of \(\chi^2\) |
| \(\chi^2_{2,\,0.95} = 5.99_{[1]}\) | B1 | State or use correct tabular \(\chi^2\) value |
| Accept \(H_0\) if \(\chi^2 \leq\) tabular value | M1 | Valid method for reaching conclusion |
| No difference in preferences | A1 | Conclusion consistent with correct values (AEF) |
| Part total: 8 | ||
| \(\chi^2_{new} = n \times \chi^2\) | M1 | Calculate new value \(\chi_{new}^2\) |
| \(\chi^2_{2,\,0.95} = 5.99_{[1]}\) | B1 | State or use correct tabular \(\chi^2\) value |
| \(n > 5.99/1.64\), \(n_{min} = 4\) | M1 A1 | Find \(n_{min}\) |
| Part total: 4 | [Total: 12] |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Answer/Working | Marks | Guidance |
| \(\frac{1}{2}mv^2 = \frac{1}{2}mu^2 + mga(1-\cos\theta)\) \([v^2 = u^2 + 2ga(1-\cos\theta)]\) | M1 A1 | Use conservation of energy (\(v^2 = \ldots\)) |
| \(R = mg\cos\theta - mv^2/a\) | M1 A1 | Equate radial forces (\(R\) may be taken as zero) |
| \(0 = mg(3\cos\theta - 2) - mu^2/a\) | Eliminate \(v^2\) to find \(\cos\theta\) when \(R=0\) | |
| \(\cos\theta_1 = \frac{1}{3}(2 + 2/5) = 4/5\) | M1 A1 | A.G. (denoting this \(\theta\) by \(\theta_1\)) |
| \(v_1^2 = 2ga/5 + 2ga/5 = 4ga/5\) | B1 | Find \(v^2\) at this point |
| \(v_2^2 = v_1^2\sin^2\theta_1 + 2ga(1 + \cos\theta_1)\) \(= (4/5 \times 3^2/5^2 + 2 \times 9/5)ga = 486ga/125\) or \(3.89ga\) | M1, A1 | Find vertical comp. \(v_2\) of \(v\) at plane (using \(u\) in place of \(v_1\) can earn M1 A0) |
| \(v_3 = (5/9)v_2\) \([v_3^2 = 6ga/5]\) | M1 | Find vertical comp. \(v_3\) of rebound speed |
| \(v_3^2/2g = (5/9)^2(486ga/125)/2g = 3a/5\) | M1, A1 | Find vertical height reached |
| Part total: 6+6 = 12 |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| \(H_0: \mu_X = \mu_Y\), \(H_1: \mu_X < \mu_Y\) | B1 |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| \([= 0.4974 \text{ or } 0.7053^2]\) | M1 A1 | Allow use of biased: \(\sigma_{X,60}^2 = 0.4891\) or \(0.6994^2\) |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| \([= 0.8801 \text{ or } 0.9381^2]\) | M1 A1 | Allow use of biased: \(\sigma_{Y,80}^2 = 0.8691\) or \(0.9323^2\) |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| \(= 0.01929 \text{ or } 0.1389^2\) | ||
| \((or \ 0.01901 \text{ or } 0.1379^2)\) | M1 A1 | Allow use of \(\sigma_{X,60}^2\), \(\sigma_{Y,80}^2\) |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| \((or -1.813)\) | M1, A1 |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| \(\Phi(z) = 0.9641 \text{ (or } 0.9651)\) | M1 |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| \(3.59 \text{ (or } 3.49)\) | M1 |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| \(\alpha > 3.6\) | A1 | 12 |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| \(= 0.7165 \text{ or } 0.8465^2\) |
| Answer | Marks |
|---|---|
| \(= -1.73\) |
| Answer | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| \(\Phi(z) = 0.9582\), \(\alpha > 4.2\) | [12] |
## Question 10:
| Answer/Working | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| $H_0$: No difference in preferences [or independent] | B1 | State (at least) null hypothesis |
| $28.57 \quad 37.71 \quad 13.71$ | | Find expected values (to 1 d.p.) |
| $21.43 \quad 28.29 \quad 10.29$ | M1 A1 | (lose A1 if rounded to integers) |
| $\chi^2 = 0.411 + 0.078 + 0.214 + 0.549 + 0.104 + 0.286 = 1.64$ (or $1.61$ if 1 d.p. used) | M1 A1 | Calculate value of $\chi^2$ |
| $\chi^2_{2,\,0.95} = 5.99_{[1]}$ | B1 | State or use correct tabular $\chi^2$ value |
| Accept $H_0$ if $\chi^2 \leq$ tabular value | M1 | Valid method for reaching conclusion |
| No difference in preferences | A1 | Conclusion consistent with correct values (AEF) |
| **Part total: 8** | | |
| $\chi^2_{new} = n \times \chi^2$ | M1 | Calculate new value $\chi_{new}^2$ |
| $\chi^2_{2,\,0.95} = 5.99_{[1]}$ | B1 | State or use correct tabular $\chi^2$ value |
| $n > 5.99/1.64$, $n_{min} = 4$ | M1 A1 | Find $n_{min}$ |
| **Part total: 4** | **[Total: 12]** | |
---
## Question 11a:
| Answer/Working | Marks | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| $\frac{1}{2}mv^2 = \frac{1}{2}mu^2 + mga(1-\cos\theta)$ $[v^2 = u^2 + 2ga(1-\cos\theta)]$ | M1 A1 | Use conservation of energy ($v^2 = \ldots$) |
| $R = mg\cos\theta - mv^2/a$ | M1 A1 | Equate radial forces ($R$ may be taken as zero) |
| $0 = mg(3\cos\theta - 2) - mu^2/a$ | | Eliminate $v^2$ to find $\cos\theta$ when $R=0$ |
| $\cos\theta_1 = \frac{1}{3}(2 + 2/5) = 4/5$ | M1 A1 | **A.G.** (denoting this $\theta$ by $\theta_1$) |
| $v_1^2 = 2ga/5 + 2ga/5 = 4ga/5$ | B1 | Find $v^2$ at this point |
| $v_2^2 = v_1^2\sin^2\theta_1 + 2ga(1 + \cos\theta_1)$ $= (4/5 \times 3^2/5^2 + 2 \times 9/5)ga = 486ga/125$ or $3.89ga$ | M1, A1 | Find vertical comp. $v_2$ of $v$ at plane (using $u$ in place of $v_1$ can earn M1 A0) |
| $v_3 = (5/9)v_2$ $[v_3^2 = 6ga/5]$ | M1 | Find vertical comp. $v_3$ of rebound speed |
| $v_3^2/2g = (5/9)^2(486ga/125)/2g = 3a/5$ | M1, A1 | Find vertical height reached |
| **Part total: 6+6 = 12** | | |
## Question 11b:
**Hypotheses:**
$H_0: \mu_X = \mu_Y$, $H_1: \mu_X < \mu_Y$ | B1 |
---
**Estimate population variance using X's sample:**
$s_X^2 = (85.8 - 58.2^2/60) / 59$
$[= 0.4974 \text{ or } 0.7053^2]$ | M1 A1 | Allow use of biased: $\sigma_{X,60}^2 = 0.4891$ or $0.6994^2$
---
**Estimate population variance using Y's sample:**
$s_Y^2 = (188.6 - 97.6^2/80) / 79$
$[= 0.8801 \text{ or } 0.9381^2]$ | M1 A1 | Allow use of biased: $\sigma_{Y,80}^2 = 0.8691$ or $0.9323^2$
---
**Estimate population variance for combined sample:**
$s^2 = s_X^2/60 + s_Y^2/80$
$= 0.01929 \text{ or } 0.1389^2$ | |
$(or \ 0.01901 \text{ or } 0.1379^2)$ | M1 A1 | Allow use of $\sigma_{X,60}^2$, $\sigma_{Y,80}^2$
---
**Calculate value of z (to 2 d.p., either sign):**
$z = (0.97 - 1.22) / s$
$= -0.25/0.1389 = -1.80$
$(or -1.813)$ | M1, A1 |
---
**Find $\Phi(z)$:**
$\Phi(z) = 0.9641 \text{ (or } 0.9651)$ | M1 |
---
**Find corresponding significance level:**
$3.59 \text{ (or } 3.49)$ | M1 |
---
**Find set of possible values of $\alpha$ (to 1 d.p.):**
$\alpha > 3.6$ | A1 | **12**
---
**S.R.** Allow (implicit) assumption of equal variances as follows, but deduct A1 if not explicit:
**Find pooled estimate of common variance $s^2$:**
$(60\sigma_{X,60}^2 + 80\sigma_{Y,80}^2)/138$
$= 0.7165 \text{ or } 0.8465^2$ | |
---
**Calculate value of z (to 2 d.p.):**
$z = (0.97 - 1.22)/s\sqrt{(1/60 + 1/80)}$
$= -1.73$ | |
---
**Find set of possible values of $\alpha$ (to 1 d.p.):**
$\Phi(z) = 0.9582$, $\alpha > 4.2$ | | **[12]**
10 Customers were asked which of three brands of coffee, $A , B$ and $C$, they prefer. For a random sample of 80 male customers and 60 female customers, the numbers preferring each brand are shown in the following table.
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{ | l | c | c | c | }
\hline
& $A$ & $B$ & $C$ \\
\hline
Male & 32 & 36 & 12 \\
\hline
Female & 18 & 30 & 12 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
Test, at the $5 \%$ significance level, whether there is a difference between coffee preferences of male and female customers.
A larger random sample is now taken. It consists of $80 n$ male customers and $60 n$ female customers, where $n$ is a positive integer. It is found that the proportions choosing each brand are identical to those in the smaller sample. Find the least value of $n$ that would lead to a different conclusion for the 5\% significance level hypothesis test.
\hfill \mbox{\textit{CAIE FP2 2013 Q10}}