WJEC Further Unit 2 Specimen — Question 5 10 marks

Exam BoardWJEC
ModuleFurther Unit 2 (Further Unit 2)
SessionSpecimen
Marks10
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicHypothesis test of a Poisson distribution
TypeComment on test validity or assumptions
DifficultyStandard +0.3 This is a standard chi-squared goodness of fit test with a Poisson distribution. Students must calculate expected frequencies using the given mean, combine categories to meet the rule of 5, compute the test statistic, and compare to critical values. While it requires multiple steps and careful calculation, it follows a well-rehearsed procedure with no novel insight needed, making it slightly easier than average for Further Maths.
Spec5.06b Fit prescribed distribution: chi-squared test

The manager of a hockey team studies last season's results and puts forward the theory that the number of goals scored per match by her team can be modelled by a Poisson distribution with mean 2.0. The number of goals scored during the season are summarised below.
Goals scored01234 or more
Frequency61115108
  1. State suitable hypotheses to carry out a goodness of fit test. [1]
  2. Carry out a \(\chi^2\) goodness of fit test on this data set, using a 5% level of significance and draw a conclusion in context. [9]

AnswerMarks Guidance
(a) \(H_0\): The data can be modelled by the Poisson distribution with mean 2. \(H_1\): The data cannot be modelled by the Poisson distribution with mean 2.B1 AO3
(b) The expected frequencies are:
AnswerMarks Guidance
Goals scored0 1
Obs6 11
Exp6.767 13.534
B1, B1AO3, AO3 For at least 1 correct; For all correct
Use of \(\chi^2\) stat = \(\sum \frac{O^2}{E} - N = \frac{6^2}{6.767} + \frac{11^2}{13.534} + ... + \frac{8^2}{7.144} - 50 = 0.93\)M1, A1, A1 AO3, AO2, AO1
DF = 4; 5% crit val = 9.488; Since 0.93 < 9.488 (Accept \(H_0\)). We conclude that the data can be modelled by the Poisson distribution with mean 2.B1, B1, B1, B1 AO1, AO1, AO2, AO3
**(a)** $H_0$: The data can be modelled by the Poisson distribution with mean 2. $H_1$: The data cannot be modelled by the Poisson distribution with mean 2. | B1 | AO3

**(b)** The expected frequencies are:

| Goals scored | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 or more |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obs | 6 | 11 | 15 | 10 | 8 |
| Exp | 6.767 | 13.534 | 13.534 | 9.022 | 7.144 |

| B1, B1 | AO3, AO3 | For at least 1 correct; For all correct

Use of $\chi^2$ stat = $\sum \frac{O^2}{E} - N = \frac{6^2}{6.767} + \frac{11^2}{13.534} + ... + \frac{8^2}{7.144} - 50 = 0.93$ | M1, A1, A1 | AO3, AO2, AO1

DF = 4; 5% crit val = 9.488; Since 0.93 < 9.488 (Accept $H_0$). We conclude that the data can be modelled by the Poisson distribution with mean 2. | B1, B1, B1, B1 | AO1, AO1, AO2, AO3 | [10]

---
The manager of a hockey team studies last season's results and puts forward the theory that the number of goals scored per match by her team can be modelled by a Poisson distribution with mean 2.0. The number of goals scored during the season are summarised below.

\begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Goals scored & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 or more \\
\hline
Frequency & 6 & 11 & 15 & 10 & 8 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}

\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item State suitable hypotheses to carry out a goodness of fit test. [1]
\item Carry out a $\chi^2$ goodness of fit test on this data set, using a 5% level of significance and draw a conclusion in context. [9]
\end{enumerate}

\hfill \mbox{\textit{WJEC Further Unit 2  Q5 [10]}}