WJEC Unit 4 Specimen — Question 5 7 marks

Exam BoardWJEC
ModuleUnit 4 (Unit 4)
SessionSpecimen
Marks7
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicHypothesis test of Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient
TypeTwo-tailed test for any correlation
DifficultyModerate -0.3 This is a straightforward application of hypothesis testing for correlation with standard procedures: stating H₀ and H₁, comparing r=0.895 to critical values from tables for n=17, and interpreting a given p-value. Part (a) requires only routine recall of the test procedure with no problem-solving, while part (b) is even simpler—just interpreting a p-value. The question is slightly easier than average because it's highly structured and requires no derivation or insight, though it does involve multiple parts and contextual interpretation.
Spec2.02c Scatter diagrams and regression lines2.02d Informal interpretation of correlation2.05f Pearson correlation coefficient2.05g Hypothesis test using Pearson's r5.08a Pearson correlation: calculate pmcc5.08d Hypothesis test: Pearson correlation

5. A hotel owner in Cardiff is interested in what factors hotel guests think are important when staying at a hotel. From a hotel booking website he collects the ratings for 'Cleanliness', 'Location', 'Comfort' and 'Value for money' for a random sample of 17 Cardiff hotels.
(Each rating is the average of all scores awarded by guests who have contributed reviews using a scale from 1 to 10 , where 10 is 'Excellent'.) The scatter graph shows the relationship between 'Value for money' and 'Cleanliness' for the sample of Cardiff hotels. \includegraphics[max width=\textwidth, alt={}, center]{b35e94ab-a426-4fca-9ecb-c659e0143ed7-4_693_1033_749_516}
  1. The product moment correlation coefficient for 'Value for money' and 'Cleanliness' for the sample of 17 Cardiff hotels is 0.895 . Stating your hypotheses clearly, test, at the \(5 \%\) level of significance, whether this correlation is significant. State your conclusion in context.
  2. The hotel owner also wishes to investigate whether 'Value for money' has a significant correlation with 'Cost per night'. He used a statistical analysis package which provided the following output which includes the Pearson correlation coefficient of interest and the corresponding \(p\)-value.
    Value for moneyCost per night
    Value for money1
    Cost per night
    0.047
    \(( 0.859 )\)
    1
    Comment on the correlation between 'Value for money' and 'Cost per night'.

AnswerMarks Guidance
(a) \(H_0: \rho = 0\)B1 AO3
\(H_1: \rho \neq 0 \text{ two-sided}\)
\(TS = 0.895\)B1 AO1
\(CV = \pm 0.4821\)B1 AO1
\(\text{Since } TS > 0.4821, \text{ Reject } H_0\)B1 AO2
\(\text{Strong evidence to suggest the correlation coefficient is greater than zero}\)E1 AO3
(b) \(p\text{-value for correlation between Value for money and Cost per night is } > 0.05\)E1 AO2
\(\text{Cost per night does not seem to be correlated to Value for money.}\)E1 AO2
**(a)** $H_0: \rho = 0$ | B1 | AO3 | $H_0: \rho = 0$; $H_1: \rho > 0$ one-sided; Population stated or implied |

| $H_1: \rho \neq 0 \text{ two-sided}$ | — | — |  |

| $TS = 0.895$ | B1 | AO1 | $TS = 0.895$ |

| $CV = \pm 0.4821$ | B1 | AO1 | $CV = \pm 0.412$ |

| $\text{Since } TS > 0.4821, \text{ Reject } H_0$ | B1 | AO2 | Since $TS > 0.412$, Reject $H_0$ |

| $\text{Strong evidence to suggest the correlation coefficient is greater than zero}$ | E1 | AO3 | Strong evidence to suggest the correlation coefficient is greater than zero |

**(b)** $p\text{-value for correlation between Value for money and Cost per night is } > 0.05$ | E1 | AO2 |  |

| $\text{Cost per night does not seem to be correlated to Value for money.}$ | E1 | AO2 |  |
5. A hotel owner in Cardiff is interested in what factors hotel guests think are important when staying at a hotel. From a hotel booking website he collects the ratings for 'Cleanliness', 'Location', 'Comfort' and 'Value for money' for a random sample of 17 Cardiff hotels.\\
(Each rating is the average of all scores awarded by guests who have contributed reviews using a scale from 1 to 10 , where 10 is 'Excellent'.)

The scatter graph shows the relationship between 'Value for money' and 'Cleanliness' for the sample of Cardiff hotels.\\
\includegraphics[max width=\textwidth, alt={}, center]{b35e94ab-a426-4fca-9ecb-c659e0143ed7-4_693_1033_749_516}
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item The product moment correlation coefficient for 'Value for money' and 'Cleanliness' for the sample of 17 Cardiff hotels is 0.895 . Stating your hypotheses clearly, test, at the $5 \%$ level of significance, whether this correlation is significant. State your conclusion in context.
\item The hotel owner also wishes to investigate whether 'Value for money' has a significant correlation with 'Cost per night'. He used a statistical analysis package which provided the following output which includes the Pearson correlation coefficient of interest and the corresponding $p$-value.

\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{ | c | c | c | }
\hline
 & Value for money & Cost per night \\
\hline
Value for money & 1 &  \\
\hline
Cost per night & \begin{tabular}{ c }
0.047 \\
$( 0.859 )$ \\
\end{tabular} & 1 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}

Comment on the correlation between 'Value for money' and 'Cost per night'.
\end{enumerate}

\hfill \mbox{\textit{WJEC Unit 4  Q5 [7]}}