Edexcel S3 2024 June — Question 2 10 marks

Exam BoardEdexcel
ModuleS3 (Statistics 3)
Year2024
SessionJune
Marks10
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicHypothesis test of Spearman’s rank correlation coefficien
TypeHypothesis test for positive correlation
DifficultyStandard +0.3 This is a straightforward application of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient with clear data and standard hypothesis testing. Part (a) requires ranking and calculating rs using the standard formula (routine but multi-step), part (b) is a standard one-tailed test with critical value lookup, part (c) tests conceptual understanding (ranks vs raw data), and part (d) requires simple reasoning about how one data change affects rankings. All parts follow textbook procedures with no novel insight required, making it slightly easier than average.
Spec5.08e Spearman rank correlation5.08f Hypothesis test: Spearman rank

  1. Aarush is asked to estimate the price of 7 kettles and rank them in order of decreasing price.
Aarush's order of decreasing price is \(D A F C B G E\) The actual prices of the 7 kettles are shown in the table below.
Kettle\(A\)\(B\)\(C\)\(D\)\(E\)\(F\)\(G\)
Price (£)99.9914.9934.9749.9919.9729.998.99
  1. Calculate Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between Aarush's order and the actual order. Use a rank of 1 for the highest priced kettle.
    Show your working clearly.
  2. Using a \(5 \%\) level of significance, test whether or not there is evidence to suggest that Aarush is able to rank kettles in order of decreasing price. You should state your hypotheses and critical value.
  3. Explain why Aarush did not use the product moment correlation coefficient in this situation. Aarush discovered that kettle A's price was recorded incorrectly and should have been \(\pounds 49.99\) rather than \(\pounds 99.99\)
  4. Explain what effect this has on the rankings for the price.

Question 2:
Part (a):
AnswerMarks Guidance
Answer/WorkingMark Guidance
Attempt to rank Aarush's order and actual order (ranks as shown in table)M1 At least 4 correct in either row
\(\sum d^2 = 1+1+1+1+4+1+1 = 10\)M1 Finding differences between each pair of ranks and evaluating \(\sum d^2\)
\(r_s = 1 - \dfrac{6 \times 10}{7 \times 48}\)dM1 Dependent on previous 2 M marks; using \(r_s = 1 - \dfrac{6\sum d^2}{7\times 48}\)
\(= 0.8214...\) awrt \(0.821\)A1cso Allow \(\dfrac{23}{28}\)
Part (b):
AnswerMarks Guidance
Answer/WorkingMark Guidance
\(H_0: \rho = 0\), \(H_1: \rho > 0\)B1 Both hypotheses in terms of \(\rho\) or \(\rho_s\); condone \(p\); cannot use \(r\)
Critical value \(r_s = 0.7143\)M1 Allow \(
Reject \(H_0\) / result is significant / \(r_s\) lies in critical regionM1 Correct non-contradictory statement consistent with \(r_s < 1\) and CV
Evidence to support Aarush can rank the kettles in order of priceA1 Dependent on all previous method marks; must reject \(H_0\); needs rank, kettles, price
Part (c):
AnswerMarks Guidance
Answer/WorkingMark Guidance
Aarush has already ranked them, or the order/price is not normally distributedB1 Correct reason; data already ranked; condone "it is ordinal data"
Part (d):
AnswerMarks Guidance
Answer/WorkingMark Guidance
Kettles \(A\) and \(D\) would have a tied rank \((1.5)\)B1 Must mention both \(A\) and \(D\); allow "equal rank", "average rank"; condone "order" for rank
# Question 2:

## Part (a):

| Answer/Working | Mark | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Attempt to rank Aarush's order and actual order (ranks as shown in table) | M1 | At least 4 correct in either row |
| $\sum d^2 = 1+1+1+1+4+1+1 = 10$ | M1 | Finding differences between each pair of ranks and evaluating $\sum d^2$ |
| $r_s = 1 - \dfrac{6 \times 10}{7 \times 48}$ | dM1 | Dependent on previous 2 M marks; using $r_s = 1 - \dfrac{6\sum d^2}{7\times 48}$ |
| $= 0.8214...$ awrt $0.821$ | A1cso | Allow $\dfrac{23}{28}$ |

## Part (b):

| Answer/Working | Mark | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| $H_0: \rho = 0$, $H_1: \rho > 0$ | B1 | Both hypotheses in terms of $\rho$ or $\rho_s$; condone $p$; cannot use $r$ |
| Critical value $r_s = 0.7143$ | M1 | Allow $|$CV$| = 0.7143$ or better |
| Reject $H_0$ / result is significant / $r_s$ lies in critical region | M1 | Correct non-contradictory statement consistent with $r_s < 1$ and CV |
| Evidence to support Aarush can **rank** the **kettles** in order of **price** | A1 | Dependent on all previous method marks; must reject $H_0$; needs **rank**, **kettles**, **price** |

## Part (c):

| Answer/Working | Mark | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Aarush has already ranked them, or the order/price is not normally distributed | B1 | Correct reason; data already ranked; condone "it is ordinal data" |

## Part (d):

| Answer/Working | Mark | Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Kettles $A$ and $D$ would have a tied rank $(1.5)$ | B1 | Must mention both $A$ and $D$; allow "equal rank", "average rank"; condone "order" for rank |

---
\begin{enumerate}
  \item Aarush is asked to estimate the price of 7 kettles and rank them in order of decreasing price.
\end{enumerate}

Aarush's order of decreasing price is $D A F C B G E$\\
The actual prices of the 7 kettles are shown in the table below.

\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{ | c | c | c | c | c | c | c | c | }
\hline
Kettle & $A$ & $B$ & $C$ & $D$ & $E$ & $F$ & $G$ \\
\hline
Price (£) & 99.99 & 14.99 & 34.97 & 49.99 & 19.97 & 29.99 & 8.99 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}

(a) Calculate Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between Aarush's order and the actual order.

Use a rank of 1 for the highest priced kettle.\\
Show your working clearly.\\
(b) Using a $5 \%$ level of significance, test whether or not there is evidence to suggest that Aarush is able to rank kettles in order of decreasing price.

You should state your hypotheses and critical value.\\
(c) Explain why Aarush did not use the product moment correlation coefficient in this situation.

Aarush discovered that kettle A's price was recorded incorrectly and should have been $\pounds 49.99$ rather than $\pounds 99.99$\\
(d) Explain what effect this has on the rankings for the price.

\hfill \mbox{\textit{Edexcel S3 2024 Q2 [10]}}