Edexcel Paper 3 2023 June — Question 2 9 marks

Exam BoardEdexcel
ModulePaper 3 (Paper 3)
Year2023
SessionJune
Marks9
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicHypothesis test of binomial distributions
TypeState test assumptions or distributions
DifficultyModerate -0.8 This is a straightforward hypothesis testing question with standard binomial distribution calculations. Part (a) requires stating a basic condition (independence), parts (b) and (c) are routine binomial probability calculations, and part (d) is a standard one-tailed hypothesis test with clearly stated parameters. All steps follow textbook procedures with no novel insight required, making it easier than average.
Spec2.04b Binomial distribution: as model B(n,p)2.04c Calculate binomial probabilities5.05b Unbiased estimates: of population mean and variance

  1. A machine fills packets with sweets and \(\frac { 1 } { 7 }\) of the packets also contain a prize.
The packets of sweets are placed in boxes before being delivered to shops. There are 40 packets of sweets in each box. The random variable \(T\) represents the number of packets of sweets that contain a prize in each box.
  1. State a condition needed for \(T\) to be modelled by \(\mathrm { B } \left( 40 , \frac { 1 } { 7 } \right)\) A box is selected at random.
  2. Using \(T \sim \mathrm {~B} \left( 40 , \frac { 1 } { 7 } \right)\) find
    1. the probability that the box has exactly 6 packets containing a prize,
    2. the probability that the box has fewer than 3 packets containing a prize. Kamil's sweet shop buys 5 boxes of these sweets.
  3. Find the probability that exactly 2 of these 5 boxes have fewer than 3 packets containing a prize. Kamil claims that the proportion of packets containing a prize is less than \(\frac { 1 } { 7 }\) A random sample of 110 packets is taken and 9 packets contain a prize.
  4. Use a suitable test to assess Kamil's claim. You should
    • state your hypotheses clearly
    • use a \(5 \%\) level of significance

Question 2:
Part (a)
AnswerMarks Guidance
Comment about independence or random packing e.g. "prizes must be placed in packets at random/independently of each other" or about constant probability e.g. "the probability of a packet containing a prize is constant/the same/fixed"B1 (1) May use idea of independent events: suitable reason in context covering random packing or packets filled independently. Must see key words. B0 for idea of only 2 cases or idea of a fixed number of trials.
Part (b)(i)
AnswerMarks Guidance
\([P(T=6) =]\ 0.17273\ldots\) awrt \(\mathbf{0.173}\)B1 For awrt 0.173.
Part (b)(ii)
AnswerMarks Guidance
\([P(T < 3) = P(T,\ 2) =]\ 0.061587\ldots\) awrt \(\mathbf{0.0616}\)B1 (2) For awrt 0.0616.
Part (c)
\([K = \text{no. of boxes with fewer than 3 packets containing a prize}]\)
AnswerMarks Guidance
\(K \sim B(5,\ \text{"0.0616"})\)M1 For sight of \(B(5, \text{"0.0616"})\) or \({}^5C_2(\text{"0.0616"})^2(1-\text{"0.0616"})^3\) ft their answer to (b)(ii).
\(P(K=2) = 0.031344\ldots\) in range \([\mathbf{0.0313}\text{--}\mathbf{0.0314}]\)A1 (2) For answer in range [0.0313 to 0.0314]. Use of 0.0616 gives 0.031356, ans only 2/2.
Part (d)
AnswerMarks Guidance
\(H_0: p = \tfrac{1}{7} \quad H_1: p < \tfrac{1}{7}\)B1 For both hypotheses correct in terms of \(p\) or \(\pi\).
\([X = \text{no. of packets containing a prize}]\ X \sim B\!\left(110,\ \tfrac{1}{7}\right)\)M1 For selecting an appropriate model, may be implied by 1st A1 or \(P(X=9) = 0.0199(2\ldots)\). Also allow Normal: sight of \(N\!\left(\frac{110}{7}, \frac{660}{49}\right)\) or awrt 13.5, or probability 0.045(20..) or 0.033(66..).
\([P(X \leqslant 9)] = 0.038292\ldots\)A1 1st A1 for 0.038 or better, or allow 0.04 with sight of \(P(X,\ 9)\). ALT Critical Region: Allow CR of \(X \leqslant 9\) (or \(X < 10\)) provided supporting probability seen.
[Significant result or reject \(H_0\)] e.g. there is evidence to support Kamil's claimA1 (4) 2nd A1 (dep on 1st A1 and indep of hyp's) for suitable conclusion in context that suggests support for Kamil's claim or states evidence that proportion/probability/chance of packets containing a prize is less than \(\frac{1}{7}\). Do not award 2nd A1 for contradictory statements.
# Question 2:

## Part (a)
Comment about **independence** or **random** packing e.g. "prizes must be placed in packets at random/independently of each other" **or** about **constant probability** e.g. "the probability of a packet containing a prize is constant/the same/fixed" | B1 **(1)** | May use idea of independent events: suitable reason in context covering random packing or packets filled independently. Must see key words. B0 for idea of only 2 cases or idea of a fixed number of trials.

## Part (b)(i)
$[P(T=6) =]\ 0.17273\ldots$ awrt $\mathbf{0.173}$ | B1 | For awrt 0.173.

## Part (b)(ii)
$[P(T < 3) = P(T,\ 2) =]\ 0.061587\ldots$ awrt $\mathbf{0.0616}$ | B1 **(2)** | For awrt 0.0616.

## Part (c)
$[K = \text{no. of boxes with fewer than 3 packets containing a prize}]$
$K \sim B(5,\ \text{"0.0616"})$ | M1 | For sight of $B(5, \text{"0.0616"})$ or ${}^5C_2(\text{"0.0616"})^2(1-\text{"0.0616"})^3$ ft their answer to (b)(ii).

$P(K=2) = 0.031344\ldots$ in range $[\mathbf{0.0313}\text{--}\mathbf{0.0314}]$ | A1 **(2)** | For answer in range [0.0313 to 0.0314]. Use of 0.0616 gives 0.031356, ans only 2/2.

## Part (d)
$H_0: p = \tfrac{1}{7} \quad H_1: p < \tfrac{1}{7}$ | B1 | For both hypotheses correct in terms of $p$ or $\pi$.

$[X = \text{no. of packets containing a prize}]\ X \sim B\!\left(110,\ \tfrac{1}{7}\right)$ | M1 | For selecting an appropriate model, may be implied by 1st A1 or $P(X=9) = 0.0199(2\ldots)$. Also allow Normal: sight of $N\!\left(\frac{110}{7}, \frac{660}{49}\right)$ or awrt 13.5, or probability 0.045(20..) or 0.033(66..).

$[P(X \leqslant 9)] = 0.038292\ldots$ | A1 | 1st A1 for 0.038 or better, or allow 0.04 with sight of $P(X,\ 9)$. **ALT Critical Region:** Allow CR of $X \leqslant 9$ (or $X < 10$) provided supporting probability seen.

[Significant result or reject $H_0$] e.g. there is evidence to support Kamil's claim | A1 **(4)** | 2nd A1 (dep on 1st A1 and indep of hyp's) for suitable conclusion in context that suggests support for Kamil's claim **or** states evidence that proportion/probability/chance of packets containing a prize is less than $\frac{1}{7}$. Do not award 2nd A1 for contradictory statements.

---
\begin{enumerate}
  \item A machine fills packets with sweets and $\frac { 1 } { 7 }$ of the packets also contain a prize.
\end{enumerate}

The packets of sweets are placed in boxes before being delivered to shops. There are 40 packets of sweets in each box.

The random variable $T$ represents the number of packets of sweets that contain a prize in each box.\\
(a) State a condition needed for $T$ to be modelled by $\mathrm { B } \left( 40 , \frac { 1 } { 7 } \right)$

A box is selected at random.\\
(b) Using $T \sim \mathrm {~B} \left( 40 , \frac { 1 } { 7 } \right)$ find\\
(i) the probability that the box has exactly 6 packets containing a prize,\\
(ii) the probability that the box has fewer than 3 packets containing a prize.

Kamil's sweet shop buys 5 boxes of these sweets.\\
(c) Find the probability that exactly 2 of these 5 boxes have fewer than 3 packets containing a prize.

Kamil claims that the proportion of packets containing a prize is less than $\frac { 1 } { 7 }$\\
A random sample of 110 packets is taken and 9 packets contain a prize.\\
(d) Use a suitable test to assess Kamil's claim.

You should

\begin{itemize}
  \item state your hypotheses clearly
  \item use a $5 \%$ level of significance
\end{itemize}

\hfill \mbox{\textit{Edexcel Paper 3 2023 Q2 [9]}}