Edexcel D1 — Question 4 11 marks

Exam BoardEdexcel
ModuleD1 (Decision Mathematics 1)
Marks11
PaperDownload PDF ↗
Mark schemeDownload PDF ↗
TopicMatchings and Allocation
TypeMaximum matching algorithm application
DifficultyModerate -0.8 This is a standard textbook application of the maximum matching algorithm with a straightforward bipartite graph setup. The question guides students through each step (draw graph, show initial matching, apply algorithm, explain impossibility), requiring only routine execution of a memorized algorithm rather than problem-solving insight. The alternating path is easy to identify, and part (d) requires only basic observation about Hall's marriage condition.
Spec7.02e Bipartite graphs: K_{m,n} notation7.02f Bipartite test: colouring argument

4. This question should be answered on the sheet provided. The Prime Minister is planning a reshuffle and the table indicates which posts each of the six ministers involved would be willing to accept.
MinisterGovernment Position
\(P\)Chancellor ( \(C\) )
\(Q\)Foreign Secretary ( \(F\) ), Minister for Education ( \(E\) )
\(R\)Minister for Defence ( \(D\) ), Minister for Industry ( \(I\) )
SMinister for Defence ( \(D\) ), Home Secretary ( \(H\) )
\(T\)Home Secretary (H)
\(U\)Chancellor ( \(C\) ), Foreign Secretary ( \(F\) )
  1. Draw a bipartite graph to model this situation. Initially the Prime Minister matches Minister \(P\) to the post of Chancellor, \(Q\) to Foreign Secretary, \(R\) to Defence and \(T\) to Home Secretary.
  2. Draw this initial matching.
  3. Starting from this initial matching use the maximum matching algorithm to find a complete matching. Indicate clearly how the algorithm has been applied, listing any alternating paths used. Minister \(U\), on reflection, now expresses no interest in becoming Foreign Secretary.
  4. Explain why no complete matching is now possible.
    (2 marks)

AnswerMarks Guidance
(a) [Bipartite graph diagram showing matching between two sets]A1
(b) initial matching shown by \(\equiv\)B1
(c) Search for alternating path giving e.g. \(S - D - R - I\) (breakthrough). Change status giving \(S = D = R = I\). Search for alternating path giving e.g. \(U - F - Q - E\) (breakthrough). Change status giving \(U = F = Q = E\). Complete matching e.g. \(P - C, Q - E, R - I, S - D, T - H, U - F\)M1 A1; M1; M1 A1; M1; A1
(d) \(P\) and \(U\) both now only interested in \(C\) which only one can haveB2 (11)
**(a)** [Bipartite graph diagram showing matching between two sets] | A1 |

**(b)** initial matching shown by $\equiv$ | B1 |

**(c)** Search for alternating path giving e.g. $S - D - R - I$ (breakthrough). Change status giving $S = D = R = I$. Search for alternating path giving e.g. $U - F - Q - E$ (breakthrough). Change status giving $U = F = Q = E$. Complete matching e.g. $P - C, Q - E, R - I, S - D, T - H, U - F$ | M1 A1; M1; M1 A1; M1; A1 |

**(d)** $P$ and $U$ both now only interested in $C$ which only one can have | B2 | (11) |

---
4. This question should be answered on the sheet provided.

The Prime Minister is planning a reshuffle and the table indicates which posts each of the six ministers involved would be willing to accept.

\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|l|l|}
\hline
Minister & Government Position \\
\hline
$P$ & Chancellor ( $C$ ) \\
\hline
$Q$ & Foreign Secretary ( $F$ ), Minister for Education ( $E$ ) \\
\hline
$R$ & Minister for Defence ( $D$ ), Minister for Industry ( $I$ ) \\
\hline
S & Minister for Defence ( $D$ ), Home Secretary ( $H$ ) \\
\hline
$T$ & Home Secretary (H) \\
\hline
$U$ & Chancellor ( $C$ ), Foreign Secretary ( $F$ ) \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item Draw a bipartite graph to model this situation.

Initially the Prime Minister matches Minister $P$ to the post of Chancellor, $Q$ to Foreign Secretary, $R$ to Defence and $T$ to Home Secretary.
\item Draw this initial matching.
\item Starting from this initial matching use the maximum matching algorithm to find a complete matching. Indicate clearly how the algorithm has been applied, listing any alternating paths used.

Minister $U$, on reflection, now expresses no interest in becoming Foreign Secretary.
\item Explain why no complete matching is now possible.\\
(2 marks)
\end{enumerate}

\hfill \mbox{\textit{Edexcel D1  Q4 [11]}}